@article{Mo2023, 
author = {Xuming Mo and Wei Cai and Jirong Qi and Zhuoming Xu and Ying Wang and Weihui Yan and Shoujun Li and Nianguo Dong and Xinxin Chen and Jinfen Liu and Qiang Shu and Jimei Chen and Haibo Zhang and Hao Zhang and Quansheng Xing and Qi An and Xiaofeng Li and Xu Wang and Yan He and Junwu Su and Taibing Fan and Teng Ming and Weibing Tang and Li Hong and Jinghao Zheng and Ming Ye and Guocheng Sun and Yiqun Ding and Liang Tao and Yifeng Yang and Zhongshi Wu and Hua Cao and Qiang Wang and Keming Yang and Libing Zhang and Ping Wen and Yanqin Cui and Bo Zhai and Yong Zou and Qingya Tang and Rui Chen and Chun Wu and Zhiyu Feng and Caixia Liu and Yaping Mi and Rufang Zhang and Ke Lin and Xin Li and Mingan Pi and Xiangming Fan and Shanshan Shi and Peng Huang and Zhengxia Pan and Jiafeng Qi and Renwei Chen and Shuguang Tao and Yaqin Shu and Huifeng Zhang and Lan Jiang and Min Da and Nishant Patel and Liang Hu and  Cardiac Surgery Group of Pediatric Surgery Society of Chinese Medical Association and  Parenteral Enteral Nutrition Society of Chinese Medical Association},
title = {Expert Consensus on Nutritional Support for Children with Congenital Heart Disease (2023 Edition)},
year = {2023},
journal = {Structural and Congenital Heart Disease},
volume = {18},
number = {6},
pages = {571-593},
keywords = {Congenital heart disease, nutrition, enteral, parenteral, expert consensus},
url = {https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.32604/chd.2024.048939},
doi = {10.32604/chd.2024.048939},
abstract = {The second edition of the expert consensus on pediatric nutrition was formed based on a global update of pediatric nutrition guidelines or consensus worldwide, the management of congenital heart disease, and the results of multi-center clinical nutrition research for congenital heart disease following the first Chinese consensus edition of 2016. The consensus was also shaped by the results of three discussion sessions and two questionnaires conducted by the 13-member collaboration group. This process was informed by both clinical guidelines and expert consensus. The quality of literature, both in English and Chinese, and the level of recommendations were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system.}
}