AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Food Science Article
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Evolution and Logic of China’s Food Safety Governance System: An Analysis Based on Historical Institutionalism

School of Criminology, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Food safety is not only important for the nation, but also for its people. Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, the governance of food safety in our country has undergone comprehensive and profound transformations. This article conducts an in-depth analysis of the evolution of China’s food safety governance system from the perspective of historical institutionalism. Within the structural framework of historical institutionalism, the process of institutional change is influenced by factors such as the macro-social background, meso-level ideas, and micro-level actors. The evolution of China’s food safety governance system can be divided into five stages: the administrative control system led by the food sector (1949-1978), the mixed governance system led by the health department (1979-2002), the multi-departmental parallel segment-wise governance system (2003-2012), the professional governance system led by the food and drug administration (2013-2017), and the comprehensive governance system led by market regulatory authorities (2018 to present). From a historical institutionalist perspective, the evolution of the system reveals a profounder internal logic. Under the constraints of path dependence as well as the joint influence of external key nodes and internal adaptations, China’s food safety governance system exhibits a continuous interaction between institutional balance and institutional transformation, demonstrating strong institutional resilience.

CLC number: F203 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6630(2025)05-0328-12

References

[1]

LINDEE S, ABRAHAM J. Science, politics, and the pharmaceutical industry: controversy and bias in drug regulation[J]. Technology and Culture, 1998, 39(2): 336. DOI:10.2307/3107068.

[7]

HACKER J S. Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: the hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States[J]. American Political Science Review, 2004, 98(2): 243-260. DOI:10.1017/s0003055404001121.

[37]

PIERSON P. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics[J]. American Political Science Review, 2000, 94(2): 251-267. DOI:10.2307/2586011.

Food Science
Pages 328-339
Cite this article:
WEI L, LI C. Evolution and Logic of China’s Food Safety Governance System: An Analysis Based on Historical Institutionalism. Food Science, 2025, 46(5): 328-339. https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20240801-013

91

Views

3

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 01 August 2024
Published: 15 March 2025
© Beijing Academy of Food Sciences 2025.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return