AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Simulation of CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in shale oil reservoirs: Unveiling the impacts of nano-confinement and oil composition

School of Petroleum, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, P. R. China
National Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, P. R. China
Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, P. R. China
Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo 315200, P. R. China
Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N1N4, Canada
Show Author Information

Abstract

CO2 injection into oil reservoirs is expected to achieve enhanced oil recovery along with the benefit of carbon storage, while the application potential of this strategy for shale reservoirs is unclear. In this work, a numerical model for multiphase flow in shale oil reservoirs is developed to investigate the impacts of nano-confinement and oil composition on shale oil recovery and CO2 storage efficiency. Two shale oils with different maturity levels are selected, with the higher-maturity shale oil containing lighter components. The results indicate that the saturation pressure of the lower-maturity shale oil continues to increase with increasing CO2 injection, while that of the higher-maturity shale oil continues to decrease. The recovery factor and CO2 storage rate for higher-maturity shale oil after CO2 huff-n-puff are 12.02% and 44.76%, respectively, while for lower-maturity shale oil, these are 4.41% and 69.33%, respectively. These data confirm the potential of enhanced oil recovery in conjunction with carbon storage in shale oil reservoirs. Under the nano-confinement impact, a decrease in the oil saturation in the matrix during production is reduced, which leads to a significant increase in oil production and a significant decrease in gas production. The oil production of the two kinds of shale oil is comparable, but the gas production of higher-maturity shale oil is significantly higher. Nano-confinement shows a greater impact on the bubble point pressure of higher-maturity shale oil and a more pronounced impact on the production of lower-maturity shale oil.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Advances in Geo-Energy Research
Pages 106-118

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Song Y, Song Z, Chen Z, et al. Simulation of CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in shale oil reservoirs: Unveiling the impacts of nano-confinement and oil composition. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2024, 13(2): 106-118. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2024.08.05

2653

Views

252

Downloads

31

Crossref

34

Web of Science

37

Scopus

Received: 07 May 2024
Revised: 01 June 2024
Accepted: 25 June 2024
Published: 30 June 2024
© The Author(s) 2024.

This article is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.