AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Integration of Intestinal Flora and Small Molecule Metabolite to Analyze the Role of Factors Regulating Feed Conversion in Broiler Chickens

XiaoJun JU1Ming ZHANG1YiFan LIU1GaiGe JI1YanJu SHAN1YunJie TU1JianMin ZOU1HaiTao ZHANG2LiangYong BIAN2JingTing SHU1( )
Jiangsu Institute of Poultry Science/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Poultry Genetic Breeding, Yangzhou 225125, Jiangsu
Changzhou Lihua livestock Ltd, Changzhou 213168, Jiangsu
Show Author Information

Abstract

【Objective】

Feed Conversion Rate (FCR) is an important economic trait index in livestock and poultry production. Through the analysis of intestinal flora and small molecular metabolites, the factors affecting the regulation of FCR in broilers were explored.

【Method】

Good health condition, the same batch of 0-day-old Jatropha curcas chicks were selected, free to feed and drink. At 57 days of age, 500 males with normal development and similar body weight ((2 374.96 ± 214.39) g) were selected and transferred to the assay house, with an acclimatization period of 3 days. The official assay was performed at 60 days of age, with an experimental period of 18 days, and 20 birds with high feed conversion rate (HF) and low feed conversion rate (LF) were selected for slaughtering at the marketable age (78 days of age), respectively, based on the results of the automated feeding system. Twenty birds with HF and LF were selected for slaughter at the market age (78 days old) according to the results of the automatic feeding system. Chicken intestines were isolated for determination of intestinal morphology, while cecal chow was harvested for joint analysis of microbial and small molecule metabolite differences between the HF and LF cecums of broiler chickens and correlation analyses using 16S rRNA sequencing and globally precise non-targeted metabolomics.

【Result】

(1) Compared with the LF group, the daily weight gain in HF group was significantly decreased (P<0.05), while the FCR was significantly increased (P<0.05), the jejunal length was significantly decreased (P<0.05), rectal length was significantly increased (P<0.05), and jejunal villus height/crypt depth ratio was significantly decreased (P<0.05). (2) Compared with the LF group, Chao1, Shannon, Observed_species, and Faith_pd indices were significantly decreased in the HF group (P<0.05). The difference in compositional structure between HF and LF was large (P<0.05). Genera with LDA values greater than 3 in the LF group were Blautia_A, Barnesiella, Massilistercora, Papillibacter, Mitsuokella, Paramuribaculum, and UBA738. The genera with LDA values greater than 3 in the HF group were Desulfovibrio_R, Alloprevotella, and Intestinimonas. (3) Thirty-two differential metabolites were screened, among which Docosahexaenoic acid, beta-carotene, and D-Mannose 6-phosphate were more multiplicative. Among these differential metabolites fatty acyl, benzene and substituted derivatives were more frequent. (4) The microorganisms that showed significant negative correlation with FCR values were Papillibacter, Blautia_A, and Paramuribaculum. The metabolites that showed a significant negative correlation with FCR values were Phenylethylamine, beta-Carotene, Antibiotic JI-20A, trans-Cinnamate, Xanthosine, 3-Methoxyanthranilate, Phthalic acid, Niacinamide, gamma-L-Glutamyl-D-alanine, 5-Nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino) benzoic acid, Desaminotyrosine, and 1-palmitoylglycerophosphocholine. The metabolites that showed significant positive correlation with FCR values were Phosphorylcholine. Gamma-L-Glutamyl-D-alanine was significantly positively correlated with Blautia_A, while Phosphorylcholine was significantly positively correlated with Intestinimonas.

【Conclusion】

The broiler feed conversion was associated with intestinal flora and metabolites, while Papillibacter, Blautia_A, Barnesella, and Mitsuokella might be marker microorganisms affecting feed efficiency. Desmethyltyrosine, β-carotene, Xanthosine, gamma-L-Glutamyl-D-alanine, and Phosphorylcholine might be marker metabolites affecting feed efficiency. Intestinal flora could influence FCR directly or through microbial metabolites, and microbe-metabolite associations suggested specific pathways of action that may influence feed conversion.

References

[1]
BLANDER J M, LONGMAN R S, ILIEV I D, SONNENBERG G F, ARTIS D. Regulation of inflammation by microbiota interactions with the host. Nature Immunology, 2017, 18: 851-860.
[2]
DITTOE D K, OLSON E G, RICKE S C. Impact of the gastrointestinal microbiome and fermentation metabolites on broiler performance. Poultry Science, 2022, 101(5): 101786.
[3]
GRICE E A, SEGRE J A. The human microbiome: Our second genome. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2012, 13: 151-170.
[4]
CHEN L, BAO Y, WANG D D, TIAN Y, ZENG T, GU T T, XU W W, LU L Z. Integrated omics analysis reveals the differentiation of intestinal microbiota and metabolites between Pekin ducks and Shaoxing ducks. Poultry Science, 2024, 103(9): 103976.
[5]
HUANG Y, LV H J, SONG Y C, SUN C J, ZHANG Z F, CHEN S R. Community composition of cecal microbiota in commercial yellow broilers with high and low feed efficiencies. Poultry Science, 2021, 100(4): 100996.
[6]
DU W Y, DENG J X, YANG Z L, ZENG L H, YANG X R. Metagenomic analysis reveals linkages between cecal microbiota and feed efficiency in Xiayan chickens. Poultry Science, 2020, 99(12): 7066-7075.
[7]
MCCORMACK U M, CURIÃO T, METZLER-ZEBELI B U, MAGOWAN E, BERRY D P, REYER H, PRIETO M L, BUZOIANU S G, HARRISON M, REBEIZ N, CRISPIE F, COTTER P D, O’SULLIVAN O, GARDINER G E, LAWLOR P G. Porcine feed efficiency-associated intestinal microbiota and physiological traits: finding consistent cross-locational biomarkers for residual feed intake. mSystems, 2019, 4(4): e00324-18.
[8]
SIEGERSTETTER S C, SCHMITZ-ESSER S, MAGOWAN E, WETZELS S U, ZEBELI Q, LAWLOR P G, O’CONNELL N E, METZLER-ZEBELI B U. Intestinal microbiota profiles associated with low and high residual feed intake in chickens across two geographical locations. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(11): e0187766.
[9]
BAE Y, KOO B, LEE S, MO J, OH K, MO I P. Bacterial diversity and its relationship to growth performance of broilers. Korean Journal of Veterinary Research, 2017, 57(3): 159-167.
[10]
STANLEY D, GEIER M S, DENMAN S E, HARING V R, CROWLEY T M, HUGHES R J, MOORE R J. Identification of chicken intestinal microbiota correlated with the efficiency of energy extraction from feed. Veterinary Microbiology, 2013, 164(1/2): 85-92.
[11]
YAN W, SUN C J, YUAN J W, YANG N. Gut metagenomic analysis reveals prominent roles of Lactobacillus and cecal microbiota in chicken feed efficiency. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 45308.
[12]
TOROK V A, HUGHES R J, MIKKELSEN L L, PEREZ-MALDONADO R, BALDING K, MACALPINE R, PERCY N J, OPHEL-KELLER K. Identification and characterization of potential performance-related gut microbiotas in broiler chickens across various feeding trials. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77(17): 5868-5878.
[13]
STANLEY D, DENMAN S E, HUGHES R J, GEIER M S, CROWLEY T M, CHEN H L, HARING V R, MOORE R J. Intestinal microbiota associated with differential feed conversion efficiency in chickens. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2012, 96(5): 1361-1369.
[14]
SINGH K M, SHAH T, DESHPANDE S, JAKHESARA S J, KORINGA P G, RANK D N, JOSHI C G. High through put 16S rRNA gene-based pyrosequencing analysis of the fecal microbiota of high FCR and low FCR broiler growers. Molecular Biology Reports, 2012, 39(12): 10595-10602.
[15]
LEESON S, SUMMERS J J, LEESON S, SUMMERS J D. Scott's nutrition of the chicken. India: CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt Ltd. 2001.
[16]
CHAMORRO S, ROMERO C, BRENES A, SÁNCHEZ-PATÁN F, BARTOLOMÉ B, VIVEROS A, ARIJA I. Impact of a sustained consumption of grape extract on digestion, gut microbial metabolism and intestinal barrier in broiler chickens. Food & Function, 2019, 10(3): 1444-1454.
[17]
QUAN Y D, SHANG X G, CHEN W, ZHENG C T. Physiological functions of glutamine and its effects on intestinal health of weaned piglets. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2024: 1-10. (2024-07-13). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5461.S.20240709.2238.017.html. (in Chinese)
[18]
VIGORS S, SWEENEY T, O’SHEA C J, KELLY A K, O’DOHERTY J V. Pigs that are divergent in feed efficiency, differ in intestinal enzyme and nutrient transporter gene expression, nutrient digestibility and microbial activity. Animal, 2016, 10(11): 1848-1855.
[19]
HAO Y S, JI Z Q, SHEN Z J, XUE Y J, ZHANG B, YU D X, LIU T, LUO D W, XING G N, TANG J, et al. Increase dietary fiber intake ameliorates cecal morphology and drives cecal species-specific of short-chain fatty acids in white Pekin ducks. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13: 853797.
[20]
YAN X X, ZHANG H, LIN A L, SU Y. Antagonization of ghrelin suppresses muscle protein deposition by altering gut microbiota and serum amino acid composition in a pig model. Biology, 2022, 11(6): 840.
[21]
YASOOB T B, YU D F, KHALID A R, ZHANG Z, ZHU X F, SAAD H M, HANG S Q. Oral administration of Moringa oleifera leaf powder relieves oxidative stress, modulates mucosal immune response and cecal microbiota after exposure to heat stress in New Zealand White rabbits. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2021, 12(1): 66.
[22]
LI Q Y. Effects of methadone maintenance treatment and compulsory isolation detoxification on gut microbial diversity[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[23]
OTTOSSON F, BRUNKWALL L, ERICSON U, NILSSON P M, ALMGREN P, FERNANDEZ C, MELANDER O, ORHO-MELANDER M. Connection between BMI-related plasma metabolite profile and gut microbiota. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2018, 103(4): 1491-1501.
[24]
YUAN W W. Effect of multi-stage ketogenic diet on the structural characteristics of gut microbiota[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[25]
FLUITMAN K S, DAVIDS M, OLOFSSON L E, WIJDEVELD M, TREMAROLI V, KEIJSER B J F, VISSER M, BÄCKHED F, NIEUWDORP M, IJZERMAN R G. Gut microbial characteristics in poor appetite and undernutrition: A cohort of older adults and microbiota transfer in germ-free mice. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 2022, 13(4): 2188-2201.
[26]
LUO S H, MAO R, LI Y. Mendelian randomization highlights gut microbiota of short-chain FattyAcids’ producer as protective factor of cerebrovascular disease. Current Neurovascular Research, 2024, 21(1): 32-40.
[27]
EVERARD A, LAZAREVIC V, DERRIEN M, GIRARD M, MUCCIOLI G G, NEYRINCK A M, POSSEMIERS S, VAN HOLLE A, FRANÇOIS P, DE VOS W M, et al. Responses of gut microbiota and glucose and lipid metabolism to prebiotics in genetic obese and diet-induced leptin-resistant mice. Diabetes, 2011, 60(11): 2775-2786.
[28]
FIELDING R A, REEVES A R, JASUJA R, LIU C, BARRETT B B, LUSTGARTEN M S. Muscle strength is increased in mice that are colonized with microbiota from high-functioning older adults. Experimental Gerontology, 2019, 127: 110722.
[29]
MAHMUD M R, SALONEN A, PELTONIEMI O, VENHORANTA H, OLIVIERO C. Impact of intestinal microbiota on growth performance of suckling and weaned piglets. Microbiology Spectrum, 2023, 11(3): e03744-22.
[30]
TAN Z, WANG Y, YANG T, AO H, CHEN S K, XING K, ZHANG F X, ZHAO X T, LIU J F, WANG C D. Differences in gut microbiota composition in finishing Landrace pigs with low and high feed conversion ratios. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2018, 111(9): 1673-1685.
[31]
BJERRUM L, ENGBERG R M, LESER T D, JENSEN B B, FINSTER K, PEDERSEN K. Microbial community composition of the ileum and cecum of broiler chickens as revealed by molecular and culture-based techniques. Poultry Science, 2006, 85(7): 1151-1164.
[32]
STANLEY D, HUGHES R J, MOORE R J. Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 98(10): 4301-4310.
[33]
SUN L L, XIE C, WANG G, WU Y, WU Q, WANG X M, LIU J, DENG Y Y, XIA J L, CHEN B, et al. Gut microbiota and intestinal FXR mediate the clinical benefits of metformin. Nature Medicine, 2018, 24: 1919-1929.
[34]
MICHAEL O S, DIBIA C L, SOETAN O A, ADEYANJU O A, OYEWOLE A L, BADMUS O O, ADETUNJI C O, SOLADOYE A O. Sodium acetate prevents nicotine-induced cardiorenal dysmetabolism through uric acid/creatine kinase-dependent pathway. Life Sciences, 2020, 257: 118127.
[35]
WEI Y X, GAO J, KOU Y B, LIU M N, MENG L Y, ZHENG X P, XU S H, LIANG M, SUN H X, LIU Z Z, WANG Y G. The intestinal microbial metabolite desaminotyrosine is an anti-inflammatory molecule that modulates local and systemic immune homeostasis. The FASEB Journal, 2020, 34(12): 16117-16128.
[36]
SHETE V, QUADRO L. Mammalian metabolism of β-carotene: Gaps in knowledge. Nutrients, 2013, 5(12): 4849-4868.
[37]
REBOUL E. Absorption of vitamin A and carotenoids by the enterocyte: Focus on transport proteins. Nutrients, 2013, 5(9): 3563-3581.
[38]
AHMED S A, SARMA P, BARGE S R, SWARGIARY D, DEVI G S, BORAH J C. Xanthosine, a purine glycoside mediates hepatic glucose homeostasis through inhibition of gluconeogenesis and activation of glycogenesis via regulating the AMPK/FoxO1/AKT/GSK3β signaling cascade. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 2023, 371: 110347.
[39]
ZHOU J, LIU J, LIN Q Q, SHI L H, ZENG Z G, GUAN L C, MA Y Z, ZENG Y T, ZHONG S L, XU L S. Characteristics of the gut microbiome and metabolic profile in elderly patients with sarcopenia. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2023, 14: 1279448.
[40]
REN Y L, SHI X Y, MU J, LIU S Y, QIAN X, PEI W L, NI S H, ZHANG Z D, LI L, ZHANG Z. Chronic exposure to parabens promotes non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in association with the changes of the gut microbiota and lipid metabolism. Food & Function, 2024, 15(3): 1562-1574.
[41]
ZHU J X, LIU W B, BIAN Z, MA Y M, KANG Z X, JIN J H, LI X Y, GE S Y, HAO Y L, ZHANG H X, XIE Y H. Lactobacillus plantarum Zhang-LL inhibits colitis-related tumorigenesis by regulating arachidonic acid metabolism and CD22-mediated B-cell receptor regulation. Nutrients, 2023, 15(21): 4512.
[42]
KRAUTKRAMER K A, FAN J, BÄCKHED F. Gut microbial metabolites as multi-Kingdom intermediates. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2021, 19: 77-94.
[43]
PESSOA J, BELEW G D, BARROSO C, EGAS C, JONES J G. The gut microbiome responds progressively to fat and/or sugar-rich diets and is differentially modified by dietary fat and sugar. Nutrients, 2023, 15(9): 2097.
Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Pages 1223-1238

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
JU X, ZHANG M, LIU Y, et al. Integration of Intestinal Flora and Small Molecule Metabolite to Analyze the Role of Factors Regulating Feed Conversion in Broiler Chickens. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1223-1238. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.06.013

136

Views

3

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 28 December 2024
Accepted: 24 January 2025
Published: 16 March 2025
© 2025 The Journal of Scientia Agricultura Sinica