AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon in Hulunbuir and Its Influencing Factors

XinJia WU1Wei XUE2YiDan YAN1YingYing NIE1LiMing YE3LiJun XU1( )
State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Observation and Research Station of Hulunbuir Grassland Ecosystem, Beijing 100081, China
Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture Meteorological Office of Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna 666100, Yunnan, China
Department of Geology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium
Show Author Information

Abstract

【Objective】

This study aimed to analyze the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and driving factors of soil organic carbon (SOC) content in Hulunbuir, China, in order to provide the scientific basis for soil carbon storage management and ecosystem services.

【Method】

The point-to-point sampling survey method was used to collect measured SOC data from 1980 (historical data) and 2022, involving four land use types: farmland, grassland, forest, and wetland. Using regression kriging method, combined with environmental variables such as temperature, precipitation, slope, altitude, and NDVI, the spatial prediction of SOC content and its changes was carried out.

【Result】

(1) The SOC content in 1980 was significantly affected by these five factors (P<0.05), while the SOC data in 2022 was mainly affected by altitude, slope, precipitation, and NDVI, with no significant effect from temperature (P=0.07). The fitting accuracies of the models for the two periods of 1980 and 2022 were R2=0.60 and R2=0.63, respectively, indicating that the predictive model had a certain level of reliability. (2) According to spatial prediction data, the average SOC content in Hulunbuir was 40.29 g·kg-1 in 1980, and decreased to 31.75 g·kg-1 in 2022. The spatial variation trend of soil SOC content in the two periods was similar, with higher content in the central region and lower content in the western and eastern regions. (3) There were differences in the changes of SOC content under different land use patterns. Over the past 40 years, the SOC content of farmland, grassland, forest, and wetland soils has decreased by 4.59 g·kg-1 (13.3%), 6.08 g·kg-1(18.7%), 11.16 g·kg-1(23.0%), and 7.20 g·kg-1(24.4%), respectively.

【Conclusion】

The spatial distribution trend of SOC content in Hulunbuir area remained consistent between 1980 and 2022, and SOC content showed a decreasing trend under different land use patterns. The transformation of land use patterns was a key factor affecting the spatial distribution changes of SOC. In addition, there was uncertainty in the prediction of SOC changes by environmental variables, and future research needs to consider their dynamic characteristics. In the Hulunbuir region, the forest grassland transition zone and the forest farmland transition zone had carbon sink potential, while grasslands, central high-altitude forest areas, and farmland areas might be carbon source areas.

References

[1]
STOCKMANN U, PADARIAN J, MCBRATNEY A, MINASNY B, DE BROGNIEZ D, MONTANARELLA L, HONG S Y, RAWLINS B G, FIELD D J. Global soil organic carbon assessment. Global Food Security, 2015, 6: 9-16.
[2]
XU L, YU G R, HE N P. Increased soil organic carbon storage in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems from the 1980s to the 2010s. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(1): 49-66.
[3]
LI Q Q, LI A W, DAI T F, FAN Z M, LUO Y L, LI S, YUAN D G, ZHAO B, TAO Q, WANG C Q, LI B, GAO X S, LI Y D, LI H X, WILSON J P. Depth-dependent soil organic carbon dynamics of croplands across the Chengdu Plain of China from the 1980s to the 2010s. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(7): 4134-4146.
[4]
WANG L P, WANG X, WANG D Y, QI B S, ZHENG S F, LIU H J, LUO C, LI H X, MENG L H, MENG X T, WANG Y H. Spatiotemporal changes and driving factors of cultivated soil organic carbon in northern China’s typical agro-pastoral ecotone in the last 30 years. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(18): 3607.
[5]
MÖLLER P, ROSENTHAL E, DULSKI P, GEYER S, GUTTMAN Y. Rare earths and yttrium hydrostratigraphy along the Lake Kinneret-Dead Sea-Arava transform fault, Israel and adjoining territories. Applied Geochemistry, 2003, 18(10): 1613-1628.
[6]
WANG S, XU L, ZHUANG Q L, HE N P. Investigating the spatiotemporal variability of soil organic carbon stocks in different ecosystems of China. The Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 758: 143644.
[7]
HOUNKPATIN K O L, STENDAHL J, LUNDBLAD M, KARLTUN E. Predicting the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stock in Swedish forests using a group of covariates and site-specific data. Soil, 2021, 7(2): 377-398.
[8]
ZHANG C Z, LI W, ZHAO Z H, ZHOU Y F, ZHANG J B, WU Q C. Spatiotemporal variability and related factors of soil organic carbon in Henan Province. Vadose Zone Journal, 2018, 17(1): 1-10.
[9]
QIU J C, SONG M H, WANG C M, DOU X M, LIU F F, WANG J X, ZHU C Y, WANG S Q. Five-year warming does not change soil organic carbon stock but alters its chemical composition in an alpine peatland. Pedosphere, 2023, 33(5): 776-787.
[10]
LIN Y M, HU Z R, LI W H, CHEN H N, WANG F, NAN X X, YANG X L, ZHANG W J. Response of ecosystem carbon storage to land use change from 1985 to 2050 in the Ningxia Section of Yellow River Basin, China. Journal of Arid Land, 2024, 16(1): 110-130.
[11]
HUANG Y, SUN W J. Changes in topsoil organic carbon of croplands in mainland China over the last two decades. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006, 51(15): 1785-1803.
[12]
LI C. Loss of soil carbon threatens Chinese agriculture: A comparison on agroecosystem carbon pool in China and the US. Quaternary Sciences, 2000, 4(20): 345-350.
[13]
XIE E Z, ZHANG Y X, HUANG B, ZHAO Y C, SHI X Z, HU W Y, QU M K. Spatiotemporal variations in soil organic carbon and their drivers in southeastern China during 1981-2011. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 205: 104763.
[14]
CREAMER R E, BAREL J M, BONGIORNO G, ZWETSLOOT M J. The life of soils: integrating the who and how of multifunctionality. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 166: 108561.
[15]
MINASNY B, MCBRATNEY A B. Digital soil mapping: a brief history and some lessons. Geoderma, 2016, 264: 301-311.
[16]
CHARTIN C, STEVENS A, GOIDTS E, KRÜGER I, CARNOL M, VAN WESEMAEL B. Mapping soil organic carbon stocks and estimating uncertainties at the regional scale following a legacy sampling strategy (Southern Belgium, Wallonia). Geoderma Regional, 2017, 9: 73-86.
[17]
YANG X T, BAI X, YAO W Q, LI P F, HU J F, KANG L. Spatioemporal dynamics and driving forces of soil organic carbon changes in an arid coal mining area of China investigated based on remote sensing techniques. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 158: 111453.
[18]
BOU KHEIR R, GREVE M H, BØCHER P K, GREVE M B, LARSEN R, MCCLOY K. Predictive mapping of soil organic carbon in wet cultivated lands using classification-tree based models: The case study of Denmark. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, 91(5): 1150-1160.
[19]
MINASNY B, MCBRATNEY A B, MALONE B P, WHEELER I. Digital mapping of soil carbon. Advances in Agronomy, 2013, 118: 1-47.
[20]
KESKIN H, GRUNWALD S. Regression Kriging as a workhorse in the digital soil mapper’s toolbox. Geoderma, 2018, 326: 22-41.
[21]
AALTO J, PIRINEN P, HEIKKINEN J, VENÄLÄINEN A. Spatial interpolation of monthly climate data for Finland: comparing the performance of Kriging and generalized additive models. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2013, 112(1): 99-111.
[22]
SINDAYIHEBURA A, OTTOY S, DONDEYNE S, VAN MEIRVENNE M, VAN ORSHOVEN J. Comparing digital soil mapping techniques for organic carbon and clay content: Case study in Burundi’s central plateaus. Catena, 2017, 156: 161-175.
[23]
ZHAO Z, WANG P, CHEN J, ZHANG F. Economic spillover effect of grass-based livestock husbandry on agricultural production-A case study in Hulunbuir, China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 168: 120752.
[24]
CUI F Q, TANG H P, ZHANG Q, WANG B J, DAI L W. Integrating ecosystem services supply and demand into optimized management at different scales: a case study in Hulunbuir, China. Ecosystem Services, 2019, 39: 100984.
[25]
XIN X P, DING L, CHENG W, ZHU X Y, CHEN B R, LIU Z L, HE G L, QINGG L, YANG G X, TANG H J. Carbon storage and influencing factors of grassland vegetation in northern grassland and agro-pastoral area. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(13): 2757-2768. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.13.022. (in Chinese)
[26]
ODGERS N P, LIBOHOVA Z, THOMPSON J A. Equal-area spline functions applied to a legacy soil database to create weighted-means maps of soil organic carbon at a continental scale. Geoderma, 2012, 189/190: 153-163.
[27]
OTTOY S, ELSEN A, VAN DE VREKEN P, GOBIN A, MERCKX R, HERMY M, VAN ORSHOVEN J. An exponential change decline function to estimate soil organic carbon stocks and their changes from topsoil measurements. European Journal of Soil Science, 2016, 67(6): 816-826.
[28]
HENGL T, HEUVELINK G B M, ROSSITER D G. About regression-kriging: From equations to case studies. Computers & Geosciences, 2007, 33(10): 1301-1315.
[29]
SRIVASTAVA R M. Geostatistics: a toolkit for data analysis, spatial prediction and risk management in the coal industry. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2013, 112: 2-13.
[30]
OLIVER M A, WEBSTER R. A tutorial guide to geostatistics: computing and modelling variograms and Kriging. Catena, 2014, 113: 56-69.
[31]
ULRIKE G. Relative importance for linear regression in R: The package relaimpo. Journal of Statistical Software, 2006, 17(1): 1-27.
[32]
SHEN C C, XIAO W F, CHEN J Z, HUA L, HUANG Z L. Climate-sensitive spatial variability of soil organic carbon in multiple forests, Central China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2023, 46: e02555.
[33]
ZHANG L M, ZHENG Q F, LIU Y L, LIU S G, YU D S, SHI X Z, XING S H, CHEN H Y, FAN X Y. Combined effects of temperature and precipitation on soil organic carbon changes in the uplands of Eastern China. Geoderma, 2019, 337: 1105-1115.
[34]
LI L, YUE Y J, QIN F C, DONG X Y, SUN C, LIU Y Q, ZHANG P. Multi-scale characterization of spatial variability of soil organic carbon in a semiarid zone in northern China. Sustainability, 2022, 14(15): 9390.
[35]
MEERSMANS J, VAN WESEMAEL B, GOIDTS E, VAN MOLLE M, DE BAETS S, DE RIDDER F. Spatial analysis of soil organic carbon evolution in Belgian croplands and grasslands, 1960-2006. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17(1): 466-479.
[36]
XIE E Z, ZHANG X, LU F Y, PENG Y X, CHEN J, ZHAO Y C. Integration of a process-based model into the digital soil mapping improves the space-time soil organic carbon modelling in intensively human-impacted area. Geoderma, 2022, 409: 115599.
[37]
WANG L P, WANG X, KOOCH Y, SONG K S, ZHENG S F, WU D H. Remote estimation of soil organic carbon under different land use types in agroecosystems of Eastern China. Catena, 2023, 231: 107369.
[38]
ZHAO M S, QIU S Q, WANG S H, LI D C, ZHANG G L. Spatial-temporal change of soil organic carbon in Anhui Province of East China. Geoderma Regional, 2021, 26: e00415.
[39]
WANG X Y, LI Y Q, GONG X W, NIU Y Y, CHEN Y P, SHI X P, LI W, LIU J. Changes of soil organic carbon stocks from the 1980s to 2018 in Northern China’s agro-pastoral ecotone. Catena, 2020, 194: 104722.
[40]
ZHANG Z P, DING J L, ZHU C M, SHI H B, CHEN X Y, HAN L J, WANG J Z. Changes in soil organic carbon stocks from 1980-1990 and 2010-2020 in the northwest arid zone of China. Land Degradation & Development, 2022, 33(15): 2713-2727.
[41]
ZHANG Z P, DING J L, ZHU C M, WANG J J, GE X Y, LI X, HAN L J, CHEN X Y, WANG J Z. Historical and future variation of soil organic carbon in China. Geoderma, 2023, 436: 116557.
[42]
WANG S C, ZHAO Y W, WANG J Z, GAO J J, ZHU P, CUI X A, XU M G, ZHOU B K, LU C G. Estimation of soil organic carbon losses and counter approaches from organic materials in black soils of northeastern China. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2020, 20(3): 1241-1252.
[43]
XUE W, XU L J, NIE Y Y, WU X J, YAN Y D, YE L M, LIU X W. Study on dominant factors affecting spatial variation of soil organic carbon in Hulunbuir grassland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(12): 2378-2389. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.12.009. (in Chinese)
[44]
ZHOU Y, HARTEMINK A E, SHI Z, LIANG Z Z, LU Y L. Land use and climate change effects on soil organic carbon in North and Northeast China. The Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 647: 1230-1238.
[45]
XIE Z B, ZHU J G, LIU G, CADISCH G, HASEGAWA T, CHEN C M, SUN H F, TANG H Y, ZENG Q. Soil organic carbon stocks in China and changes from 1980s to 2000s. Global Change Biology, 2007, 13(9): 1989-2007.
[46]
YU Y Q, HUANG Y, ZHANG W. Modeling soil organic carbon change in croplands of China, 1980-2009. Global and Planetary Change, 2012, 82/83: 115-128.
[47]
CHEN J, TANG H P. Effect of grazing exclusion on vegetation characteristics and soil organic carbon of Leymus chinensis grassland in northern China. Sustainability, 2016, 8(1): 56.
[48]
VELDKAMP E, SCHMIDT M, POWERS J S, CORRE M D. Deforestation and reforestation impacts on soils in the tropics. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2020, 1: 590-605.
[49]
SHAHEB M R, VENKATESH R, SHEARER S A. A review on the effect of soil compaction and its management for sustainable crop production. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 2021, 46(4): 417-439.
[50]
DINCĂ L C, GRENNI P, ONET C, ONET A. Fertilization and soil microbial community: A review. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(3): 1198.
[51]
VÉDÈRE C, LEBRUN M, HONVAULT N, AUBERTIN M L, GIRARDIN C, GARNIER P, DIGNAC M F, HOUBEN D, RUMPEL C. How does soil water status influence the fate of soil organic matter? A review of processes across scales. Earth-Science Reviews, 2022, 234: 104214.
[52]
MAO D H, LUO L, WANG Z M, WILSON M C, ZENG Y, WU B F, WU J G. Conversions between natural wetlands and farmland in China: A multiscale geospatial analysis. The Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 634: 550-560.
[53]
ZHANG X S, LARK T J, CLARK C, YUAN Y P, LEDUC S D. Grassland-to-cropland conversion increased soil, nutrient, and carbon losses in the US Midwest between 2008 and 2016. Environmental Research Letters, 2021, 16: 1-13.
[54]
WANG A N, ZHA T G, ZHANG Z Q. Variations in soil organic carbon storage and stability with vegetation restoration stages on the Loess Plateau of China. Catena, 2023, 228: 107142.
[55]
HUANG J S, LIU W X, YANG S, YANG L, PENG Z Y, DENG M F, XU S, ZHANG B B, AHIRWAL J, LIU L L. Plant carbon inputs through shoot, root, and mycorrhizal pathways affect soil organic carbon turnover differently. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 160: 108322.
[56]
TANG X Y, LIU S G, ZHOU G Y. Erosion and vegetation restoration impacts on ecosystem carbon dynamics in South China. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2010, 74(1): 272-281.
[57]
ZHANG Y, TANG Z, YOU Y, GUO X, WU C, LIU S, SUN O. Differential effects of forest-floor litter and roots on soil organic carbon formation in a temperate oak forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2023, 180: 109017.
[58]
WANG X D, HE C, LIU B Y, ZHAO X, LIU Y, WANG Q, ZHANG H L. Effects of residue returning on soil organic carbon storage and sequestration rate in China’s croplands: A meta-analysis. Agronomy, 2020, 10(5): 691.
[59]
DAUNORAS J, KAČERGIUS A, GUDIUKAITĖ R. Role of soil microbiota enzymes in soil health and activity changes depending on climate change and the type of soil ecosystem. Biology, 2024, 13(2): 85.
Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Pages 1145-1158

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WU X, XUE W, YAN Y, et al. Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon in Hulunbuir and Its Influencing Factors. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1145-1158. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.06.008

120

Views

4

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 14 May 2024
Accepted: 11 November 2024
Published: 16 March 2025
© 2025 The Journal of Scientia Agricultura Sinica