Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
Deep learning and computer vision, using remote sensing and drones, are 2 promising nondestructive methods for plant monitoring and phenotyping. However, their applications are infeasible for many crop systems under tree canopies, such as coffee crops, making it challenging to perform plant monitoring and phenotyping at a large spatial scale at a low cost. This study aims to develop a geographic-scale monitoring method for coffee cherry counting, supported by an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered citizen science approach. The approach uses basic smartphones to take a few pictures of coffee trees; 2,968 trees were investigated with 8,904 pictures in Junín and Piura (Peru), Cauca, and Quindío (Colombia) in 2022, with the help of nearly 1,000 smallholder coffee farmers. Then, we trained and validated YOLO (You Only Look Once) v8 for detecting cherries in the dataset in Peru. An average number of cherries per picture was multiplied by the number of branches to estimate the total number of cherries per tree. The model's performance in Peru showed an R2 of 0.59. When the model was tested in Colombia, where different varieties are grown in different biogeoclimatic conditions, the model showed an R2 of 0.71. The overall performance in both countries reached an R2 of 0.72. The results suggest that the method can be applied to much broader scales and is transferable to other varieties, countries, and regions. To our knowledge, this is the first AI-powered method for counting coffee cherries and has the potential for a geographic-scale, multiyear, photo-based phenotypic monitoring for coffee crops in low-income countries worldwide.
Gay C, Estrada F, Conde C, Eakin H, Villers L. Potential impacts of climate change on agriculture: A case of study of coffee production in Veracruz, Mexico. Clim Chang. 2006;79(3):259–288.
Schroth G, Laderach P, Dempewolf J, Philpott S, Haggar J, Eakin H, Castillejos T, Moreno JG, Pinto LS, Hernandez R, et al. Towards a climate change adaptation strategy for coffee communities and ecosystems in the Sierra Madre de Chiapas, Mexico. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2009;14(7):605–625.
Zullo J, Pinto HS, Assad ED, de Ávila AMH. Potential for growing Arabica coffee in the extreme south of Brazil in a warmer world. Clim Chang. 2011;109(3):535–548.
Cerda R, Avelino J, Gary C, Tixier P, Lechevallier E, Allinne C. Primary and secondary yield losses caused by pests and diseases: Assessment and modeling in coffee. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):1–17.
Bunn C, Läderach P, Ovalle Rivera O, Kirschke D. A bitter cup: Climate change profile of global production of Arabica and Robusta coffee. Clim Chang. 2015;129(1–2):89–101.
Maskell G, Chemura A, Nguyen H, Gornott C, Mondal P. Integration of sentinel optical and radar data for mapping smallholder coffee production systems in Vietnam. Remote Sens Environ. 2021;266:Article 112709.
Castro-Tanzi S, Dietsch T, Urena N, Vindas L, Chandler M. Analysis of management and site factors to improve the sustainability of smallholder coffee production in Tarrazú, Costa Rica. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2012;155:172–181.
Castro-Tanzi S, Flores M, Wanner N, Dietsch TV, Banks J, Ureña-Retana N, Chandler M. Evaluation of a non-destructive sampling method and a statistical model for predicting fruit load on individual coffee (Coffea arabica) trees. Sci Hortic. 2014;167:117–126.
Peeters LYK, Soto-Pinto L, Perales H, Montoya G, Ishiki M. Coffee production, timber, and firewood in traditional and Inga-shaded plantations in southern Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2003;95(2–3):481–493.
Soto-Pinto L, Perfecto I, Castillo-Hernandez J, Caballero-Nieto J. Shade effect on coffee production at the northern Tzeltal zone of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2000;80(1):61–69.
Fanelli Carvalho H. The effect of bienniality on genomic prediction of yield in arabica coffee. Euphytica. 2020;216(6):101.
de Oliveira Aparecido LE, de Souza Rolim G, Camargo Lamparelli RA, de Souza PS, dos Santos ER. Agrometeorological models for forecasting coffee yield. Agron J. 2017;109(1):249–258.
Kouadio L, Deo RC, Byrareddy V, Adamowski JF, Mushtaq S, Phuong Nguyen V. Artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of Robusta coffee yield using soil fertility properties. Comput Electron Agric. 2018;155:324–338.
Barbosa BDS, Ferraz GAES, Costa L, Ampatzidis Y, Vijayakumar V, dos Santos LM. UAV-based coffee yield prediction utilizing feature selection and deep learning. Smart Agric Technol. 2021;1:Article 100010.
Rodríguez JP, Corrales DC, Aubertot JN, Corrales JC. A computer vision system for automatic cherry beans detection on coffee trees. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2020;136:142–153.
Ryo M, Schiller J, Stiller S, Rivera Palacio JC, Mengsuwan K, Safonova A, Wei Y. Deep learning for sustainable agriculture needs ecology and human involvement. J Sustain Agric Environ. 2023;2(1):40–44.
Maheswari P, Raja P, Apolo-Apolo OE, Pérez-Ruiz M. Intelligent fruit yield estimation for orchards using deep learning based semantic segmentation techniques—A review. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:10.
Tian Y, Yang G, Wang Z, Wang H, Li E, Liang Z. Apple detection during different growth stages in orchards using the improved YOLO-V3 model. Comput Electron Agric. 2019;157:417–426.
Ying Y, Zhou D-X. Unregularized online learning algorithms with general loss functions. Appl Comput Harmon Anal. 2017;42(2):224–244.
Thakur A, Thapar D, Rajan P, Nigam A. Deep metric learning for bioacoustic classification: Overcoming training data scarcity using dynamic triplet loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019;146(1):534–547.
Wu F, Yang Z, Mo X, Wu Z, Tang W, Duan J, Zou X. Detection and counting of banana bunches by integrating deep learning and classic image-processing algorithms. Comput Electron Agric. 2023;209:107827.
Ramos PJ, Prieto FA, Montoya EC, Oliveros CE. Automatic fruit count on coffee branches using computer vision. Comput Electron Agric. 2017;137:9–22.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).