Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
Detection of spikes is the first important step toward image-based quantitative assessment of crop yield. However, spikes of grain plants occupy only a tiny fraction of the image area and often emerge in the middle of the mass of plant leaves that exhibit similar colors to spike regions. Consequently, accurate detection of grain spikes renders, in general, a non-trivial task even for advanced, state-of-the-art deep neural networks (DNNs). To improve pattern detection in spikes, we propose architectural changes to Faster-RCNN (FRCNN) by reducing feature extraction layers and introducing a global attention module. The performance of our extended FRCNN-A vs. conventional FRCNN was compared on images of different European wheat cultivars, including “difficult” bushy phenotypes from 2 different phenotyping facilities and optical setups. Our experimental results show that introduced architectural adaptations in FRCNN-A helped to improve spike detection accuracy in inner regions. The mean average precision (mAP) of FRCNN and FRCNN-A on inner spikes is 76.0% and 81.0%, respectively, while on the state-of-the-art detection DNNs, Swin Transformer mAP is 83.0%. As a lightweight network, FRCNN-A is faster than FRCNN and Swin Transformer on both baseline and augmented training datasets. On the FastGAN augmented dataset, FRCNN achieved a mAP of 84.24%, FRCNN-A attained a mAP of 85.0%, and the Swin Transformer achieved a mAP of 89.45%. The increase in mAP of DNNs on the augmented datasets is proportional to the amount of the IPK original and augmented images. Overall, this study indicates a superior performance of attention mechanisms-based deep learning models in detecting small and subtle features of grain spikes.
Ullah S, Henke M, Narisetti N, Panzarová K, Trtílek M, Hejatko J, Gladilin E. Towards automated analysis of grain spikes in greenhouse images using neural network approaches: A comparative investigation of six methods. Sensors. 2021;21(22):7441.
Bi K, Jiang P, Li L, Shi B, Wang C. Non-destructive measurement of wheat spike characteristics based on morphological image processing. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2010;26:212–216.
Misra T, Arora A, Marwaha S, Chinnusamy V, Rao AR, Jain R, Sahoo RN, Ray M, Kumar S, Raju D, et al. Spikesegnet—A deep learning approach utilizing encoder decoder network with hourglass for spike segmentation and counting in wheat plant from visual imaging. Plant Methods. 2020;16:40.
Qiongyan L, Cai J, Berger B, Okamoto M, Miklavcic SJ. Detecting spikes of wheat plants using neural networks with Laws texture energy. Plant Methods. 2017;13:83.
Narisetti N, Neumann K, Röder MS, Gladilin E. Automated spike detection in diverse European wheat plants using textural features and the Frangi filter in 2D greenhouse images. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:666.
Hasan MM, Chopin JP, Laga H, Miklavcic SJ. Detection and analysis of wheat spikes using convolutional neural networks. Plant Methods. 2018;14:100.
Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015;39:1137–1149.
He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2015;37:1904–1916.
Rahim UF, Mineno H. Tomato flower detection and counting in greenhouses using faster region-based convolutional neural network. J. Image Graph. 2020;8(4):107–113.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).