AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Establishing a Gross Primary Productivity Model by SIF and PRI on the Rice Canopy

Zhanhao Zhang1Jianmao Guo1,2( )Shihui Han1Shuyuan Jin1Lei Zhang3
School of Ecology and Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology, Nanjing 210044, China
National Meteorological Centre, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has shown remarkable results in estimating vegetation carbon cycles, and combining it with the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) has great potential for estimating gross primary productivity (GPP). However, few studies have used SIF combined with PRI to estimate crop canopy GPP. Large temporal and spatial variability between SIF, PRI, and GPP has also been found in remote sensing observations, and the observed PRI and SIF are influenced by the ratio of different observed information (e.g., background, direct sunlit, and shaded leaves) and the physiological state of the vegetation. In this study, the PRI and SIF from a multi-angle spectrometer and the GPP from an eddy covariance system were used to assess the ability of the PRI to enhance the SIF-GPP estimation model. A semi-empirical kernel-driven Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) model was used to describe the hotspot PRI/SIF (PRIhs/SIFhs), and a modified two-leaf model was used to calculate the total canopy PRI/SIF (PRItot/SIFtot). We compared the accuracies of PRIhs/SIFhs and PRItot/SIFtot in estimating GPP. The results indicated that the PRItot+SIFtot-GPP model performed the best, with a correlation coefficient (R2) of the validation dataset of 0.88, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 3.74, and relative prediction deviation (RPD) of 2.71. The leaf area index (LAI) had a linear effect on the PRI/SIF estimation of GPP, but the temperature and vapor pressure differences had nonlinear effects. Compared with hotspot PRIhs/SIFhs, PRItot/SIFtot exhibited better consistency with GPP across different time series. Our research demonstrates that PRI is effective in enhancing SIF and PRI for estimating GPP on the rice canopy and also suggests that the two-leaf model would contribute to the vegetation index tracking the real-time crop productivity.

References

1

Zhou Y, Wu X, Ju W, Chen J, Wang S, Wang H, Yuan W, Black TA, Jassal RS, Ibrom A, et al. Global parameterization and validation of a two-leaf light use efficiency model for predicting gross primary production across FLUXNET sites. J Geophys Res Biogeo. 2016;121(4):1045–1072.

2

He L, Chen J, Liu J, Bélair S, Luo X. Assessment of SMAP soil moisture for global simulation of gross primary production. J Geophys Res Biogeo. 2017;122(7):1549–1563.

3

Li X, Xiao J, He B, Altaf Arain M, Beringer J, Desai AR, Emmel C, Hollinger D, Krasnova A, Mammarella I, et al. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence is strongly correlated with terrestrial photosynthesis for a wide variety of biomes: First global analysis based on OCO-2 and flux tower observations. Glob Chang Biol. 2018;24:3990–4008.

4

Sakamoto T, Gitelson AA, Wardlow BD, Verma SB, Suyker AE. Estimating daily gross primary production of maize based only on MODIS WDRVI and shortwave radiation data. Remote Sens Environ. 2011;115(12):3091–3101.

5

Verma M, Schimel DS, Evans B, Frankenberg C, Beringer J, Drewry DT, Magney TS, Marang IJ, Hutley LB, Moore CE, et al. Effect of environmental conditions on the relationship between solar-induced fluorescence and gross primary productivity at an OzFlux grassland site. J Geophys Res Biogeo. 2017;122(3):716–733.

6

Frankenberg C, Fisher JB, Worden JR, Badgley G, Saatchi SS, Lee J, Toon GC, Butz A, Jung M, Kuze A, et al. New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: Patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity. Geophys Res Lett. 2011;38(17):Article 2011GL048738.

7

Frankenberg C, O’Dell CW, Berry JA, Guanter L, Joiner J, Köhler P, Pollock R, Taylor TE. Prospects for chlorophyll fluorescence remote sensing from the orbiting carbon observatory-2. Remote Sens Environ. 2014;147:1–12.

8

Porcar-Castell A, García-Plazaola JI, Nichol CJ, Kolari P, Olascoaga B, Kuusinen N, Fernández-Marín B, Pulkkinen M, Juurola E, Nikinmaa E. Physiology of the seasonal relationship between the photochemical reflectance index and photosynthetic light use efficiency. Oecologia. 2012;170:313–323.

9

Butler WL. Energy distribution in the photochemical apparatus of photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 1978;29:345–378.

10

Nilkens M, Kress E, Lambrev PH, Miloslavina Y, Müller MG, Holzwarth AR, Jahns P. Identification of a slowly inducible zeaxanthin-dependent component of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence generated under steady-state conditions in Arabidopsis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1797(4):466–475.

11

Evain S, Flexas J, Moya I. A new instrument for passive remote sensing: 2. Measurement of leaf and canopy reflectance changes at 531 nm and their relationship with photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence. Remote Sens Environ. 2004;91(2):175–185.

12

Shrestha S, Brueck H, Asch F. Chlorophyll index, photochemical reflectance index and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements of rice leaves supplied with different N levels. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2012;113:7–13.

13

Chou S, Chen JM, Yu H, Chen B, Zhang X, Croft H, Khalid S, Li M, Shi Q. Canopy-level photochemical reflectance index from hyperspectral remote sensing and leaf-level non-photochemical quenching as early indicators of water stress in maize. Remote Sens. 2017;9(8):794.

14

Wang X, Chen JM, Ju W. Photochemical reflectance index (PRI) can be used to improve the relationship between gross primary productivity (GPP) and sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF). Remote Sens Environ. 2020;246:Article 111888.

15

Guanter L, Frankenberg C, Dudhia A, Lewis P, Gómez-Dans JL, Kuze A, Suto H, Grainger RG. Retrieval and global assessment of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT space measurements. Remote Sens Environ. 2012;121:236–251.

16

Duveiller G, Cescatti A. Spatially downscaling sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence leads to an improved temporal correlation with gross primary productivity. Remote Sens Environ. 2016;182:72–89.

17

Chen JM, Menges C, Leblanc SG. Global mapping of foliage clumping index using multi-angular satellite data. Remote Sens Environ. 2005;97(4):447–457.

18

Strahler AH, Jupp DL. Modeling bidirectional reflectance of forests and woodlands using boolean models and geometric optics. Remote Sens Environ. 1990;34(3):153–166.

19

Wanner W, Li X, Strahler AH. On the derivation of kernels for kernel-driven models of bidirectional reflectance. J Geophys Res. 1995;100(D10):21077–21089.

20

Hilker T, Coops NC, Hall FG, Black TA, Wulder MA, Nesic Z, Krishnan P. Separating physiologically and directionally induced changes in PRI using BRDF models. Remote Sens Environ. 2008;112(6):2777–2788.

21

Jia W, Coops NC, Tortini R, Pang Y, Black TA. Remote sensing of variation of light use efficiency in two age classes of Douglas-fir. Remote Sens Environ. 2018;219:284–297.

22

Ma L, Wang S, Chen J, Chen B, Zhang L, Ma L, Amir M, Sun L, Zhou G, Meng Z. Relationship between light use efficiency and photochemical reflectance index corrected using a BRDF model at a subtropical mixed Forest. Remote Sens. 2020;12(9):550.

23

Pisek J, Lang M, Kuusk J. A note on suitable viewing configuration for retrieval of forest understory reflectance from multi-angle remote sensing data. Remote Sens Environ. 2015;156:242–246.

24

Hall FG, Hilker T, Coops NC, Lyapustin A, Huemmrich KF, Middleton E, Margolis H, Drolet G, Black TA. Multi-angle remote sensing of forest light use efficiency by observing PRI variation with canopy shadow fraction. Remote Sens Environ. 2008;112(7):3201–3211.

25

Hall FG, Hilker T, Coops NC. PHOTOSYNSAT, photosynthesis from space: Theoretical foundations of a satellite concept and validation from tower and spaceborne data. Remote Sens Environ. 2011;115(8):1918–1925.

26

Zhang Q, Chen JM, Chen JM, Ju W, Wang H, Qiu F, Yang F, Fan W, Huang Q, Wang Y, et al. Improving the ability of the photochemical reflectance index to track canopy light use efficiency through differentiating sunlit and shaded leaves. Remote Sens Environ. 2017;194:1–15.

27

Guo J, Zhang Z, Guo C, Jin S. Research of light use efficiency for Paddy Rice using multi-angle hyperspectral observations. Front Earth Sci. 2022;10:Article 829315.

28

Jacquemoud S. Inversion of the PROSPECT + SAIL canopy reflectance model from AVIRIS equivalent spectra: Theoretical study. Remote Sens Environ. 1993;44(2–3):281–292.

29

Verhoef W. Earth observation modeling based on layer scattering matrices. Remote Sens Environ. 1985;17(2):165–178.

30

Gamon JA, Penuelas J, Field CB. A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency. Remote Sens Environ. 1992;41(1):35–44.

31

Panigada C, Rossini M, Meroni M, Cilia C, Busetto L, Amaducci S, Boschetti M, Cogliati S, Picchi V, Pinto F, et al. Fluorescence, PRI and canopy temperature for water stress detection in cereal crops. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2014;30:167–178.

32
Maier SW, Günther KP, Stellmes M. Sun-induced fluorescence: A new tool for precision farming. In: Digital imaging and spectral techniques: Applications to precision agriculture and crop physiology. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy; 2004. p. 207–222.
33

Webb EK, Pearman GI, Leuning R. Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Q J R Meteorol Soc. 1980;106(447):85–100.

34

Lloyd J, Taylor J. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Funct Ecol. 1994;8(3):315–323.

35

Ohtani Y, Mizoguchi Y, Watanabe T, Yasuda Y. Parameterization of NEP for gap filling in a cool-temperate coniferous forest in Fujiyoshida, Japan. J Agric Meteorol. 2005;60(5):769–772.

36

Baldocchi DD, Hincks BB, Meyers TP. Measuring biosphere-atmosphere exchanges of biologically related gases with micrometeorological methods. Ecology. 1988;69(5):1331–1340.

37

Verma SB, Dobermann A, Cassman KG, Walters DT, Knops JM, Arkebauer TJ, Suyker AE, Burba G, Amos B, Yang H, et al. Annual carbon dioxide exchange in irrigated and rainfed maize-based agroecosystems. Agric For Meteorol. 2005;131(1–2):77–96.

38

Wanner W, Strahler AH, Hu B, Lewis P, Muller J-P, Li X, Barker SC, L., Barnsley M. J. Global retrieval of bidirectional reflectance and albedo over land from EOS MODIS and MISR data: Theory and algorithm. J Geophys Res Atmos. 1997;102(D14):17143–17161.

39

Li X, Strahler AH. Geometric-optical modeling of a conifer forest canopy. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 1985;GE-23(5):705–721.

40
Ross J. The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands. In: Tasks for vegetation sciences. Hague (Netherlands): Dr W. Junk Publishers; 1981. p. 363–381
41

Los SO, North PRJ, Grey WMF, Barnsley MJ. A method to convert AVHRR normalized difference vegetation index time series to a standard viewing and illumination geometry. Remote Sens Environ. 2005;99(4):400–411.

42

Lucht W, Schaaf CB, Strahler AH. An algorithm for the retrieval of albedo from space using semiempirical BRDF models. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2000;38(2):977–998.

43

Chen JM, Leblanc SG. A four-scale bidirectional reflectance model based on canopy architecture. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 1997;35(5):1316–1337.

44

Tang S, Chen JM, Zhu Q, Li X, Chen M, Sun R, Zhou Y, Deng F, Xie D. LAI inversion algorithm based on directional reflectance kernels. J Environ Manage. 2007;85(3):638–648.

45

Jacquemoud S, Baret F. PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra. Remote Sens Environ. 1990;34(2):75–91.

46

Hilker T, Hall FG, Coops NC, Lyapustin A, Wang Y, Nesic Z, Grant NJ, Black TA, Wulder MA, Kljun N, et al. Remote sensing of photosynthetic light-use efficiency across two forested biomes: Spatial scaling. Remote Sens Environ. 2010;114(12):2863–2874.

47

Chen JM, Liu J, Cihlar J, Goulden ML. Daily canopy photosynthesis model through temporal and spatial scaling for remote sensing applications. Ecol Modell. 1999;124(2–3):99–119.

48

Gao Y, Cui L, Lei B, Zhai Y, Shi T, Wang J, Chen Y, He H, Wu G. Estimating soil organic carbon content with visible–near-infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc. 2014;68(7):712–722.

49

Atherton J, Nichol CJ, Porcar-Castell A. Using spectral chlorophyll fluorescence and the photochemical reflectance index to predict physiological dynamics. Remote Sens Environ. 2016;176:17–30.

50

Magney TS, Frankenberg C, Fisher JB, Sun Y, North GB, Davis TS, Kornfeld A, Siebke K. Connecting active to passive fluorescence with photosynthesis: A method for evaluating remote sensing measurements of Chl fluorescence. New Phytol. 2017;215(4):1594–1608.

51

Liu L, Zhang Y, Jiao Q, Peng D. Assessing photosynthetic light-use efficiency using a solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and photochemical reflectance index. Int J Remote Sens. 2013;34(12):4264–4280.

52

Zinnert JC, Nelson JD, Hoffman AM. Effects of salinity on physiological responses and the photochemical reflectance index in two co-occurring coastal shrubs. Plant Soil. 2012;354:45–55.

53

Rahimzadeh-Bajgiran P, Munehiro M, Omasa K. Relationships between the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and plant pigment indices at different leaf growth stages. Photosynth Res. 2012;113(1–3):261–271.

54

Busch FA, Hüner NP, Ensminger I. Biochemical constrains limit the potential of the photochemical reflectance index as a predictor of effective quantum efficiency of photosynthesis during the winter spring transition in Jack pine seedlings. Funct Plant Biol. 2009;36(11):1016–1026.

55

Weng J-H, Chen Y-N, Liao T-S. Relationships between chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photochemical reflectance index of tree species adapted to different temperature regimes. Funct Plant Biol. 2006;33(3):241–246.

56

Xu H, Zhang Z, Wu X, Wan J. Light use efficiency models incorporating diffuse radiation impacts for simulating terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity: A global comparison. Agric For Meteorol. 2023;332:Article 109376.

57

Zhang Z, Guo J, Jin S, Han S. Improving the ability of PRI in light use efficiency estimation by distinguishing sunlit and shaded leaves in rice canopy. Int J Remote Sens. 2023;44(18):5755–5767.

58

Lu X, Liu Z, Zhao F, Tang J. Comparison of total emitted solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and top-of-canopy (TOC) SIF in estimating photosynthesis. Remote Sens Environ. 2020;251:Article 112083.

59

Badgley G, Field CB, Berry JA. Canopy near-infrared reflectance and terrestrial photosynthesis. Sci Adv. 2017;3(3):Article e1602244.

60

Zeng Y, Badgley G, Dechant B, Ryu Y, Chen M, Berry J. A practical approach for estimating the escape ratio of near-infrared solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. Remote Sens Environ. 2019;232:Article 111209.

61

Lu X, Chen M, Liu Y, Miralles DG, Wang F. Enhanced water use efficiency in global terrestrial ecosystems under increasing aerosol loadings. Agric For Meteorol. 2017;237–238:39–49.

62

Lu X, Liu Z, An S, Miralles DG, Maes WH, Liu Y, Tang J. Potential of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to estimate transpiration in a temperate forest. Agric For Meteorol. 2018;252:75–87.

Plant Phenomics
Article number: 0144
Cite this article:
Zhang Z, Guo J, Han S, et al. Establishing a Gross Primary Productivity Model by SIF and PRI on the Rice Canopy. Plant Phenomics, 2024, 6: 0144. https://doi.org/10.34133/plantphenomics.0144

211

Views

2

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 01 August 2023
Accepted: 06 January 2024
Published: 01 February 2024
© 2024 Zhanhao Zhang et al. Exclusive licensee Nanjing Agricultural University. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).

Return