AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

The Dissection of Nitrogen Response Traits Using Drone Phenotyping and Dynamic Phenotypic Analysis to Explore N Responsiveness and Associated Genetic Loci in Wheat

Guohui Ding1,Liyan Shen1,Jie Dai1,Robert Jackson2Shuchen Liu1Mujahid Ali1Li Sun3Mingxing Wen4Jin Xiao3Greg Deakin2Dong Jiang5Xiu-e Wang3( )Ji Zhou1,2( )
College of Agriculture, Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
Cambridge Crop Research, National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB), Cambridge CB3 0LE, UK
State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Cytogenetics Institute, Nanjing Agricultural University/JCIC-MCP, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China
Zhenjiang Institute of Agricultural Science, Jurong, Jiangsu 212400, China
Regional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China

†These authors contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Inefficient nitrogen (N) utilization in agricultural production has led to many negative impacts such as excessive use of N fertilizers, redundant plant growth, greenhouse gases, long-lasting toxicity in ecosystem, and even effect on human health, indicating the importance to optimize N applications in cropping systems. Here, we present a multiseasonal study that focused on measuring phenotypic changes in wheat plants when they were responding to different N treatments under field conditions. Powered by drone-based aerial phenotyping and the AirMeasurer platform, we first quantified 6 N response-related traits as targets using plot-based morphological, spectral, and textural signals collected from 54 winter wheat varieties. Then, we developed dynamic phenotypic analysis using curve fitting to establish profile curves of the traits during the season, which enabled us to compute static phenotypes at key growth stages and dynamic phenotypes (i.e., phenotypic changes) during N response. After that, we combine 12 yield production and N-utilization indices manually measured to produce N efficiency comprehensive scores (NECS), based on which we classified the varieties into 4 N responsiveness (i.e., N-dependent yield increase) groups. The NECS ranking facilitated us to establish a tailored machine learning model for N responsiveness-related varietal classification just using N-response phenotypes with high accuracies. Finally, we employed the Wheat55K SNP Array to map single-nucleotide polymorphisms using N response-related static and dynamic phenotypes, helping us explore genetic components underlying N responsiveness in wheat. In summary, we believe that our work demonstrates valuable advances in N response-related plant research, which could have major implications for improving N sustainability in wheat breeding and production.

References

1

Seppelt R, Klotz S, Peiter E, Volk M. Agriculture and food security under a changing climate: An underestimated challenge. iScience. 2022;25(12):105551.

2

Li S, Tian Y, Wu K, Ye Y, Yu J, Zhang J, Liu Q, Hu M, Li H, Tong Y, et al. Modulating plant growth–metabolism coordination for sustainable agriculture. Nature. 2018;560(7720):595–600.

3

Ma G, Liu W, Li S, Zhang P, Wang C, Lu H, Wang L, Xie Y, Ma D, Kang G. Determining the optimal N input to improve grain yield and quality in winter wheat with reduced apparent N loss in the North China plain. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:181.

4

Bentley AR, Donovan J, Sonder K, Baudron F, Lewis JM, Voss R, Rutsaert P, Poole N, Kamoun S, Saunders DGO, et al. Near- to long-term measures to stabilize global wheat supplies and food security. Nat Food. 2022;3(7):483–486.

5

He F, Wang W, Rutter WB, Jordan KW, Ren J, Taagen E, De Witt N, Sehgal D, Sukumaran S, Dreisigacker S, et al. Genomic variants affecting homoeologous gene expression dosage contribute to agronomic trait variation in allopolyploid wheat. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):826.

6

Bahadoran Z, Ghasemi A, Mirmiran P, Azizi F, Hadaegh F. Nitrate-nitrite-nitrosamines exposure and the risk of type 1 diabetes: A review of current data. World J Diabetes. 2016;7(18):433–440.

7

Ahmed M, Rauf M, Mukhtar Z, Saeed NA. Excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers: An unawareness causing serious threats to environment and human health. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24(35):26983–26987.

8

Majumdar D, Gupta N. Nitrate pollution of groundwater and associated human health disorders. Indian J Environ Health. 2000;42(1):28–39.

9

Machado PVF, Farrell RE, Deen W, Voroney RP, Congreves KA, Wagner-Riddle C. Contribution of crop residue, soil, and fertilizer nitrogen to nitrous oxide emissions varies with long-term crop rotation and tillage. Sci Total Environ. 2021;767:Article 145107.

10

van der Putten WH, Bradford MA, Pernilla Brinkman E, van de Voorde TFJ, Veen GF. Where, when and how plant–soil feedback matters in a changing world. Funct Ecol. 2016;30(7):1109–1121.

11

Han M, Okamoto M, Beatty PH, Rothstein SJ, Good AG. The genetics of nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Annu Rev Genet. 2015;49:269–289.

12

Voss-Fels KP, Stahl A, Wittkop B, Lichthardt C, Nagler S, Rose T, Chen TW, Zetzsche H, Seddig S, Baig MM, et al. Breeding improves wheat productivity under contrasting agrochemical input levels. Nat Plants. 2019;5(7):706–714.

13

Swarbreck SM, Wang M, Wang Y, Kindred D, Sylvester-Bradley R, Shi W, Varinderpal-Singh BAR, Griffiths H. A roadmap for lowering crop nitrogen requirement. Trends Plant Sci. 2019;24(10):892–904.

14

Bevan MW, Uauy C, Wulff BBH, Zhou J, Krasileva K, Clark MD. Genomic innovation for crop improvement. Nature. 2017;543(7645):346–354.

15

Ranjan R, Yadav R. Targeting nitrogen use efficiency for sustained production of cereal crops. J Plant Nutr. 2019;42(9):1086–1113.

16

Bandyopadhyay T, Swarbreck SM, Jaiswal V, Maurya J, Gupta R, Bentley AR, Griffiths H, Prasad M. GWAS identifies genetic loci underlying nitrogen responsiveness in the climate resilient C4 model Setaria italica (L.). J Adv Res. 2022;42:249–261.

17

Monostori I, Szira F, Tondelli A, ÁrendÁs T, Gierczik K, Cattivelli L, Galiba G, Vágújfalvi A. Genome-wide association study and genetic diversity analysis on nitrogen use efficiency in a Central European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) collection. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):Article e0189265.

18

Barraclough PB, Howarth JR, Jones J, Lopez-Bellido R, Parmar S, Shepherd CE, Hawkesford MJ. Nitrogen efficiency of wheat: Genotypic and environmental variation and prospects for improvement. Eur J Agron. 2010;33(1):1–11.

19

Quan Z, Zhang X, Fang Y, Davidson EA. Different quantification approaches for nitrogen use efficiency lead to divergent estimates with varying advantages. Nat Food. 2021;2(4):241–245.

20

Yang G, Liu J, Zhao C, Li Z, Huang Y, Yu H, Xu B, Yang X, Zhu D, Zhang X, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing for field-based crop phenotyping: Current status and perspectives. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1111.

21

Jiang Z, Tu H, Bai B, Yang C, Zhao B, Guo Z, Liu Q, Zhao H, Yang W, Xiong L. Combining UAV-RGB high-throughput field phenotyping and genome-wide association study to reveal genetic variation of rice germplasms in dynamic response to drought stress. New Phytol. 2021;232(1):440–455.

22

Nguyen GN, Panozzo J, Spangenberg G, Kant S. Phenotyping approaches to evaluate nitrogen-use efficiency related traits of diverse wheat varieties under field conditions. Crop Pasture Sci. 2016;67(11):1139–1148.

23

Harkel J, Bartholomeus H, Kooistra L. Biomass and crop height estimation of different crops using UAV-based LiDAR. Remote Sens. 2020;12(1):17.

24

Guo W, Carroll ME, Singh A, Swetnam TL, Merchant N, Sarkar S, Singh AK, Ganapathysubramanian B. UAS-based plant phenotyping for research and breeding applications. Plant Phenomics. 2021;2021:9840192.

25

Bauer A, Bostrom AG, Ball J, Applegate C, Cheng T, Laycock S, Rojas SM, Kirwan J, Zhou J. Combining computer vision and deep learning to enable ultra-scale aerial phenotyping and precision agriculture: A case study of lettuce production. Hortic Res. 2019;6:70.

26

Zheng H, Zhou X, He J, Yao X, Cheng T, Zhu Y, Cao W, Tian Y. Early season detection of rice plants using RGB, NIR-G-B and multispectral images from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Comput Electron Agric. 2020;169:Article 105223.

27

Maimaitijiang M, Sagan V, Sidike P, Hartling S, Esposito F, Fritschi FB. Soybean yield prediction from UAV using multimodal data fusion and deep learning. Remote Sens Environ. 2020;237:Article 111599.

28

Sun G, Lu H, Zhao Y, Zhou J, Jackson R, Wang Y, Xu LX, Wang A, Colmer J, Ober E, et al. AirMeasurer: Open-source software to quantify static and dynamic traits derived from multiseason aerial phenotyping to empower genetic mapping studies in rice. New Phytol. 2022;236(4):1584–1604.

29

Raeva PL, Šedina J, Dlesk A. Monitoring of crop fields using multispectral and thermal imagery from UAV. Eur J Remote Sens. 2019;52(sup1):192–201.

30

Han L, Yang G, Dai H, Xu B, Yang H, Feng H, Li Z, Yang X. Modeling maize above-ground biomass based on machine learning approaches using UAV remote-sensing data. Plant Methods. 2019;15:10.

31

Argento F, Anken T, Abt F, Vogelsanger E, Walter A, Liebisch F. Site-specific nitrogen management in winter wheat supported by low-altitude remote sensing and soil data. Precis Agric. 2021;22:364–386.

32

Zhu Y, Sun G, Ding G, Zhou J, Wen M, Jin S, Zhao Q, Colmer J, Ding Y, Ober ES, et al. Large-scale field phenotyping using backpack LiDAR and CropQuant-3D to measure structural variation in wheat. Plant Physiol. 2021;187(2):716–738.

33

Fradgley NS, Bentley AR, Swarbreck SM. Defining the physiological determinants of low nitrogen requirement in wheat. Biochem Soc Trans. 2021;49(2):609–616.

34

Banerjee BP, Joshi S, Thoday-Kennedy E, Pasam RK, Tibbits J, Hayden M, Spangenberg G, Kant S. High-throughput phenotyping using digital and hyperspectral imaging-derived biomarkers for genotypic nitrogen response. J Exp Bot. 2020;71(15):4604–4615.

35

Zhang X, Du S, Xu Y, Cao C, Chen H. Reducing N application by increasing plant density based on evaluation of root, photosynthesis, N accumulation and yield of wheat. Agronomy. 2021;11(6):1080.

36

Moreau D, Allard V, Gaju O, le Gouis J, John Foulkes M, Martre P. Acclimation of leaf nitrogen to vertical light gradient at anthesis in wheat is a whole-plant process that scales with the size of the canopy. Plant Physiol. 2012;160(3):1479–1490.

37

Guilbaud CSE, Dalchau N, Purves DW, Turnbull LA. Is ‘peak N’ key to understanding the timing of flowering in annual plants? New Phytol. 2015;205(2):918–927.

38

Chen J, Zhou J, Li Q, Li H, Xia Y, Jackson R, Sun G, Zhou G, Deakin G, Jiang D, et al. CropQuant-air: An AI-powered system to enable phenotypic analysis of yield- and performance-related traits using wheat canopy imagery collected by low-cost drones. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1219983.

39

Hyles J, Bloomfield MT, Hunt JR, Trethowan RM, Trevaskis B. Phenology and related traits for wheat adaptation. Heredity. 2020;125(6):417–430.

40

van Grinsven HJM, Ebanyat P, Glendining M, Gu B, Hijbeek R, Lam SK, Lassaletta L, Mueller ND, Pacheco FS, Quemada M, et al. Establishing long-term nitrogen response of global cereals to assess sustainable fertilizer rates. Nat Food. 2022;3(2):122–132.

41

Campbell MT, Du Q, Liu K, Brien CJ, Berger B, Zhang C, Walia H. A comprehensive image-based Phenomic analysis reveals the complex genetic architecture of shoot growth dynamics in Rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Genome. 2017;10(2):10.3835/plantgenome2016.07.0064.

42

Lin J, Song N, Liu D, Liu X, Chu W, Li J, Chang S, Liu Z, Chen Y, Yang Q, et al. Histone acetyltransferase TaHAG1 interacts with TaNACL to promote heat stress tolerance in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20(9):1645–1647.

43

Good AG, Shrawat AK, Muench DG. Can less yield more? Is reducing nutrient input into the environment compatible with maintaining crop production? Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9(12):597–605.

44

Le Gouis J, Béghin D, Heumez E, Pluchard P. Genetic differences for nitrogen uptake and nitrogen utilisation efficiencies in winter wheat. Eur J Agron. 2000;12(3-4):163–173.

45

Watanabe K, Guo W, Arai K, Takanashi H, Kajiya-Kanegae H, Kobayashi M, Yano K, Tokunaga T, Fujiwara T, Tsutsumi N, et al. High-throughput phenotyping of sorghum plant height using an unmanned aerial vehicle and its application to genomic prediction modeling. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:421.

46

Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–682.

47

Islam S, Zhang J, Zhao Y, She M, Ma W. Genetic regulation of the traits contributing to wheat nitrogen use efficiency. Plant Sci. 2021;303:Article 110759.

48

Ringnér M. What is principal component analysis? Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(3):303–304.

49

Mu Q, Guo T, Li X, Yu J. Phenotypic plasticity in plant height shaped by interaction between genetic loci and diurnal temperature range. New Phytol. 2022;233(4):1768–1779.

50

Jiang T, Liu J, Gao Y, Sun Z, Chen S, Yao N, Ma H, Feng H, Yu Q, He J. Simulation of plant height of winter wheat under soil water stress using modified growth functions. Agric Water Manag. 2020;232:Article 106066.

51

Cousineau D. Fitting the three-parameter weibull distribution: Review and evaluation of existing and new methods. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul. 2009;16(1):281–288.

52

Zhou M, Zhu B, Brüggemann N, Dannenmann M, Wang Y, Butterbach-Bahl K. Sustaining crop productivity while reducing environmental nitrogen losses in the subtropical wheat-maize cropping systems: A comprehensive case study of nitrogen cycling and balance. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016;231:1–14.

53

Wang Y, Lu J, Ren T, Hussain S, Guo C, Wang S, Cong R, Li X. Effects of nitrogen and tiller type on grain yield and physiological responses in rice. AoB Plants. 2017;9(2):plx012.

54

Cobb JS, Seale MA. Examining the effect of social distancing on the compound growth rate of COVID-19 at the county level (United States) using statistical analyses and a random forest machine learning model. Public Health. 2020;185:27–29.

55

Géron A. Hands-on machine learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow: Concepts, tools, and techniques to build intelligent systems. Sebastopol (CA): O’Reilly Media Inc; 2019.

56

Liu J, Luo W, Qin N, Ding P, Zhang H, Yang C, Mu Y, Tang H, Liu Y, Li W, et al. A 55 K SNP array-based genetic map and its utilization in QTL mapping for productive tiller number in common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131(11):2439–2450.

57

Xiong H, Li Y, Guo H, Xie Y, Zhao L, Gu J, Zhao S, Ding Y, Liu L. Genetic mapping by integration of 55K SNP Array and KASP markers reveals candidate genes for important agronomic traits in Hexaploid wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:Article 628478.

58

Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, Bakker PIWD, Daly MJ, et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–575.

59

Raj A, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. FastSTRUCTURE: Variational inference of population structure in large SNP data sets. Genetics. 2014;197(2):573–589.

60

Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. TASSEL: Software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(19):2633–2635.

61

The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC), Appels R, Eversole K, Stein N, Feuillet C, Killer B, Rogers J, Pozniak CJ, Choulet F, Distelfeld A, et al. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science. 2018;361(6403):eaar7191.

62

Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: A flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(6):841–842.

63

Yin L, Zhang H, Tang Z, Xu J, Yin D, Zhang Z, Yuan X, Zhu M, Zhao S, Li X, et al. rMVP: A memory-efficient, visualization-enhanced, and parallel-accelerated tool for genome-wide association study. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2021;19(4):619–628.

64

Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: Analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(2):263–265.

65

Tmušić G, Manfreda S, Aasen H, James MR, Gonçalves G, Ben-Dor E, Brook A, Polinova M, Arranz JJ, Mészáros J, et al. Current practices in UAS-based environmental monitoring. Remote Sens. 2020;12(6):1001.

66

Liu X, Wang S, Deng X, Zhang Z, Yin L. Comprehensive evaluation of physiological traits under nitrogen stress and participation of linolenic acid in nitrogen-deficiency response in wheat seedlings. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20(1):501.

67

Yin X, Struik PC. Modelling the crop: From system dynamics to systems biology. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(8):2171–2183.

68

Hawkesford MJ, Riche AB. Impacts of G x E x M on nitrogen use efficiency in wheat and future prospects. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1157.

69

Tang J, Alelyani S, Liu H. Feature selection for classification: A review. Data Classif Algorithms Appl. 2014;37–64.

70

Wen M, Su J, Jiao C, Zhang X, Xu T, Wang T, Liu X, Wang Z, Sun L, Yuan C, et al. Pleiotropic effect of the compactum gene and its combined effects with other loci for spike and grain-related traits in wheat. Plan Theory. 2022;11(14):1837.

71

Zörb C, Ludewig U, Hawkesford MJ. Perspective on wheat yield and quality with reduced nitrogen supply. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23(11):1029–1037.

72

Yang W, Doonan JH, Hawkesford MJ, Pridmore T, Zhou J. Editorial: State-of-the-art technology and applications in crop phenomics. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:Article 767324.

73

Wu W, Wang Y, Wang L, Xu H, Zörb C, Geilfus CM, Xue C, Sun Z, Ma W. Booting stage is the key timing for split nitrogen application in improving grain yield and quality of wheat – A global meta-analysis. F Crop Res. 2022;287:Article 108665.

74

Flint J, Timpson N, Munafò M. Assessing the utility of intermediate phenotypes for genetic mapping of psychiatric disease. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37(12):733–741.

75

Roitsch T, Cabrera-Bosquet L, Fournier A, Ghamkhar K, Jiménez-Berni J, Pinto F, Ober ES. Review: New sensors and data-driven approaches–A path to next generation phenomics. Plant Sci. 2019;282:2–10.

76

Schaid DJ, Chen W, Larson NB. From genome-wide associations to candidate causal variants by statistical fine-mapping. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(8):491–504.

77

Uffelmann E, Huang QQ, Munung NS, de Vries J, Okada Y, Martin AR, Martin HC, Lappalainen T, Posthuma D. Genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Methods Prim. 2021;1(1):59.

78

Li K, Debernardi JM, Li C, Lin H, Zhang C, Jernstedt J, von Korff M, Zhong J, Dubcovsky J. Interactions between SQUAMOSA and SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE MADS-box proteins regulate meristem transitions during wheat spike development. Plant Cell. 2021;33(12):3621–3644.

79

Mekonnen T, Sneller CH, Haileselassie T, Ziyomo C, Abeyo BG, Goodwin SB, Lule D, Tesfaye K. Genome-wide association study reveals novel genetic loci for quantitative resistance to Septoria Tritici blotch in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:671323.

80

Debernardi JM, Woods DP, Li K, Li C, Dubcovsky J. MiR172-APETALA2-like genes integrate vernalization and plant age to control flowering time in wheat. PLoS Genet. 2022;18(4):Article e1010157.

81

Buchner P, Hawkesford MJ. Complex phylogeny and gene expression patterns of members of the NITRATE TRANSPORTER 1/PEPTIDE TRANSPORTER family (NPF) in wheat. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(19):5697–5710.

82

Wang W, Yu Z, He F, Bai G, Trick HN, Akhunova A, Akhunov E. Multiplexed promoter and gene editing in wheat using a virus-based guide RNA delivery system. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20(12):2332–2341.

83

Peng Z, Wang Y, Geng G, Yang R, Yang Z, Yang C, Xu R, Zhang Q, Kakar KU, Li Z, et al. Comparative analysis of physiological, enzymatic, and transcriptomic responses revealed mechanisms of salt tolerance and recovery in Tritipyrum. Front Plant Sci. 2022;12:Article 800081.

84

Caruana L, Orr DJ, Carmo-Silva E. Rubiscosome gene expression is balanced across the hexaploid wheat genome. Photosynth Res. 2022;152(1):1–11.

85

Lemaire G, Ciampitti I. Crop mass and N status as prerequisite covariables for unraveling nitrogen use efficiency across genotype-by-environment-by-management scenarios: A review. Plants. 2020;9(10):1309.

86

Hou G, Du C, Gao H, Liu S, Sun W, Lu H, Kang J, Xie Y, Ma D, Wang C. Identification of microRNAs in developing wheat grain that are potentially involved in regulating grain characteristics and the response to nitrogen levels. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20(1):87.

Plant Phenomics
Article number: 0128
Cite this article:
Ding G, Shen L, Dai J, et al. The Dissection of Nitrogen Response Traits Using Drone Phenotyping and Dynamic Phenotypic Analysis to Explore N Responsiveness and Associated Genetic Loci in Wheat. Plant Phenomics, 2023, 5: 0128. https://doi.org/10.34133/plantphenomics.0128

177

Views

9

Crossref

9

Web of Science

9

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 03 October 2023
Accepted: 23 November 2023
Published: 22 December 2023
© 2023 Guohui Ding et al. Exclusive licensee Nanjing Agricultural University. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).

Return