AI Chat Paper
Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
{{expandStatus?'Exit ':''}}Advanced Search
Agroforestry systems are complex due to the diverse interactions between their elements, and they develop over several decades. Existing numerical models focus either on the structure or on the functions of agroforestry systems. However, both of these aspects are necessary, as function influences structure and vice versa. Here, we present a representation of agroforestry systems based on combinatorial maps (which are a type of multidimensional graphs), that allows conceptualizing the structure–function relationship at the agroecosystem scale. We show that such a model can represent the structure of agroforestry systems at multiple scales and its evolution through time. We propose an implementation of this framework, coded in Python, which is available on GitHub. In the future, this framework could be coupled with knowledge based or with biophysical simulation models to predict the production of ecosystem services. The code can also be integrated into visualization tools. Combinatorial maps seem promising to provide a unifying and generic description of agroforestry systems, including their structure, functions, and dynamics, with the possibility to translate to and from other representations.
Udawatta RP, Gantzer CJ. Soil and water ecosystem services of agroforestry. J Soil Water Conserv. 2022;77(1):5A–11A.
Tzuk O, Uecker H, Meron E. The role of spatial self-organization in the design of agroforestry systems. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):Article e0236325.
Oury B. Allowing for weather in crop production model building. J Farm Econ. 1965;47(2):270–283.
Sinclair TR, Seligman NG. Crop modeling: From infancy to maturity. Agron J. 1996;88(5):698–704.
Meyer N, Bergez J-E, Justes E, Constantin J. Influence of cover crop on water and nitrogen balances and cash crop yield in a temperate climate: A modelling approach using the STICS soil-crop model. Eur J Agron. 2022;132:Article 126416.
Boote KJ, Jones JW, Pickering NB. Potential uses and limitations of crop models. Agron J. 1996;88(5):704–716.
Gaudio N, Escobar-Gutiérrez AJ, Casadebaig P, Evers JB, Gérard F, Louarn G, Colbach N, Munz S, Launay M, Marrou H, et al. Current knowledge and future research opportunities for modeling annual crop mixtures. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2019;39(2):20.
Perttunen J, Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E. LIGNUM: A model combining the structure and the functioning of trees. Ecol Model. 1998;108(1–3):189–198.
Fourcaud T, Zhang X, Stokes A, Lambers H, Korner C. Plant growth modelling and applications: The increasing importance of plant architecture in growth models. Ann Bot. 2007;101(8):1053–1063.
Crimaldi M, Cartenì F, Giannino F. VISmaF: Synthetic tree for immersive virtual visualization in smart farming part Ⅰ: Scientific background review and model proposal. Agronomy. 2021;11(12):2458.
Surový P, Yoshimoto A. Application of a functional-structural plant model (FSPM) to optimize a management regime. FORMATH. 2013;12:173–189.
de Reffye P, Hu B, Kang M, Letort V, Jaeger M. Two decades of research with the GreenLab model in agronomy. Ann Bot. 2021;127(3):281–295.
Soualiou S, Wang Z, Sun W, de Reffye P, Collins B, Louarn G, Song Y. Functional–structural plant models Mission in advancing crop science: Opportunities and prospects. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:747142.
Evers JB, van der Werf W, Stomph TJ, Bastiaans L, Anten NPR. Understanding and optimizing species mixtures using functional–structural plant modelling. J Exp Bot. 2019;70(9):2381–2388.
Lamanda N, Dauzat J, Jourdan C, Martin P, Malézieux E. Using 3D architectural models to assess light availability and root bulkiness in coconut agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst. 2008;72(1):63–74.
Rova S, Meire P, Müller F, Simeoni M, Pranovi F. A petri net modeling approach to explore the temporal dynamics of the provision of multiple ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ. 2019;655:1047–1061.
Rafflegeau S, Gosme M, Barkaoui K, Garcia L, Allinne C, Deheuvels O, Grimaldi J, Jagoret P, Lauri P-E, Merot A, Metay A, Reyes F, Saj S, Curry GN, Justes E. The ESSU concept for designing, modeling and auditing ecosystem service provision, in intercropping and agroforestry systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2023;43:43.
Van Noordwijk M, Lusiana B. WaNuLCAS, a model of water, nutrient and light capture in agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst. 1998;43(1):217–242.
Dupraz C. Hi-sAFe: A 3D agroforestry model for integrating dynamic tree–crop interactions. Sustainability. 2019;11(8):2293.
Kastuari A, Suwardhi D, Hanan H, Wikantika K, Harto AB, Virtriana R, Trisyanti SW. Implementation of SExI–FS (spatially explicit individual-based forest simulator) model using UAV aerial photo data case study: Jatinangor ITB campus. HAYATI J Biosci. 2020;27(4):314.
Degenne P, Lo Seen D, Parigot D, Forax R, Tran A, Ait Lahcen A, Curé O, Jeansoulin R. Design of a domain specific language for modelling processes in landscapes. Ecol Model. 2009;220(24):3527–3535.
Degenne P, Lo Seen D. Ocelet: Simulating processes of landscape changes using interaction graphs. SoftwareX. 2016;5(C):89–95.
Damiand G, Lienhardt P. Combinatorial maps: Efficient data structures for computer graphics and image processing. CRC Press; 2014.
Vince A. Combinatorial maps. J Comb Theory Ser B. 1983;34(1):1–21.
Essam JW, Fisher ME. Some basic definitions in graph theory. Rev Mod Phys. 1970;42(2):271–288.
Gaudio N, Louarn G, Barillot R, Meunier C, Vezy R, Launay M. Exploring complementarities between modelling approaches that enable upscaling from plant community functioning to ecosystem services as a way to support agroecological transition. Silico Plants. 2022;4(1):diab037.
Médiène S, Valantin-Morison M, Sarthou JP, de Tourdonnet S, Gosme M, Bertrand M, Roger-Estrade J, Aubertot JN, Rusch A, Motisi N, et al. Agroecosystem management and biotic interactions: A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2011;31(3):491–514.
Rigal C, Wagner S, Nguyen MP, Jassogne L, Vaast P. ShadeTreeAdvice methodology: Guiding tree-species selection using local knowledge. People Nat. 2022;4(5):1233–1248.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).
京公网安备11010802044758号