AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Drone-Based Harvest Data Prediction Can Reduce On-Farm Food Loss and Improve Farmer Income

Haozhou Wang1Tang Li1Erika Nishida1Yoichiro Kato1Yuya Fukano2( )Wei Guo1( )
Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
Show Author Information

Abstract

On-farm food loss (i.e., grade-out vegetables) is a difficult challenge in sustainable agricultural systems. The simplest method to reduce the number of grade-out vegetables is to monitor and predict the size of all individuals in the vegetable field and determine the optimal harvest date with the smallest grade-out number and highest profit, which is not cost-effective by conventional methods. Here, we developed a full pipeline to accurately estimate and predict every broccoli head size (n > 3,000) automatically and nondestructively using drone remote sensing and image analysis. The individual sizes were fed to the temperature-based growth model and predicted the optimal harvesting date. Two years of field experiments revealed that our pipeline successfully estimated and predicted the head size of all broccolis with high accuracy. We also found that a deviation of only 1 to 2 days from the optimal date can considerably increase grade-out and reduce farmer's profits. This is an unequivocal demonstration of the utility of these approaches to economic crop optimization and minimization of food losses.

References

1

Parfitt J, Barthel M, Macnaughton S. Food waste within food supply chains: Quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010;365:3065–3081.

2
Teuber R, Jensen JD. Food losses and food waste-extent, underlying drivers and impact assessment of prevention approaches. Frederiksberg (Denmark): Statens Jordbrugs-og Fiskeriøkonomiske Institut; 2016. p. 106.
3

Garrone P, Melacini M, Perego A. Opening the black box of food waste reduction. Food Policy. 2014;46:129–139.

4

Porter SD, Reay DS, Bomberg E, Higgins P. Avoidable food losses and associated production-phase greenhouse gas emissions arising from application of cosmetic standards to fresh fruit and vegetables in Europe and the UK. J Clean Prod. 2018;201:869–879.

5
Fink M, Feller C, Scharpf HC, Weier U, Maync A, Ziegler J, Paschold PJ, Strohmeyer K. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and magnesium contents of field vegetables–recent data for fertiliser recommendations and nutrient balances. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 1999;162:71–73.
6

Blok PM, Evert FK, Tielen APM, Henten EJ, Kootstra G. The effect of data augmentation and network simplification on the image-based detection of broccoli heads with mask R-CNN. J Field Robot. 2021;38(1):85–104.

7

Marshall B, Thompson R. A model of the influence of air temperature and solar radiation on the time to maturity of Calabrese Brassica oleracea var italica. Ann Bot. 1987;60(5):513–519.

8

Marshall B, Thompson R. Applications of a model to predict the time to maturity of Calabrese Brassica oleracea. Ann Bot. 1987;60(5):521–529.

9

Tan D, Birch C, Wearing A, Rickert K. Predicting broccoli development: Ⅰ. development is predominantly determined by temperature rather than photoperiod. Sci Hortic. 2000;84(3–4):227–243.

10

Tan D, Birch C, Wearing A, Rickert K. Predicting broccoli development: Ⅱ. Comparison and validation of thermal time models. Sci Hortic. 2000;86(3–4):89–101.

11
Grevsen K. Modelling plant development of broccoli. Acta Hortic. 2000;553:567–574.
12

Lindemann-Zutz K, Fricke A, Stützel H. Prediction of time to harvest and its variability in broccoli ( Brassica oleracea var. italica ) part Ⅰ. plant developmental variation and forecast of time to head induction. Sci Hortic. 2016;198:424–433.

13

Lindemann-Zutz K, Fricke A, Stützel H. Prediction of time to harvest and its variability of broccoli ( Brassica oleracea var. italica ) part Ⅱ. Growth model description, parameterisation and field evaluation. Sci Hortic. 2016;200:151–160.

14

Booij R. Cauliflower curd initiation and maturity: Variability within a crop. J Hortic Sci. 1990;65(2):167–175.

15
Shu M. The application of UAV-based hyperspectral imaging to estimate crop traits in maize inbred lines. Plant Phenomics. 2021;2021:9890745.
16

Wang Z, Shen M, Zou J. Detection and analysis of degree of maize lodging using UAV-RGB image multi-feature factors and various classification methods. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf. 2021;10(5):309.

17

Herrero-Huerta M, Bucksch A, Puttonen E, Rainey KM. Canopy roughness: A new phenotypic trait to estimate aboveground biomass from unmanned aerial system. Plant Phenomics. 2020;2020:6735967.

18
Bauer A, Bostrom AG, Ball J. Combining computer vision and deep learning to enable ultra-scale aerial phenotyping and precision agriculture: A case study of lettuce production. Hortic Res. 2019;6:70.
19
Lüling N,. Reiser D, Stana A,. Griepentrog HW. Using depth information and colour space variations for improving outdoor robustness for instance segmentation of cabbage. arXiv (2021). ArXiv:2103.16923.
20

García-Manso A, Gallardo-Caballero R, García-Orellana CJ, González-Velasco HM, Macías-Macías M. Towards selective and automatic harvesting of broccoli for Agri-food industry. Comput Electron Agric. 2021;188:106263.

21

Lin Y-C, Zhou T, Wang T, Crawford M, Habib A. New orthophoto generation strategies from UAV and ground remote sensing platforms for high-throughput phenotyping. Remote Sens. 2021;13(5):860.

22

Hu P, Guo W, Chapman SC, Guo Y, Zheng B. Pixel size of aerial imagery constrains the applications of unmanned aerial vehicle in crop breeding. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2019;154(1):1–9.

23

Hu P, Chapman SC, Zheng B. Coupling of machine learning methods to improve estimation of ground coverage from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery for high-throughput phenotyping of crops. Funct Plant Biol. 2021;48(8):766–779.

24

Velumani K, Lopez-Lozano R, Madec S, Guo W, Gillet J, Comar A, Baret F. Estimates of maize plant density from UAV RGB images using faster-RCNN detection model: Impact of the spatial resolution. Plant Phenomics. 2021;2021:9824843.

25

Guo A. Wheat yellow rust detection using UAV-based hyperspectral technology. Remote Sens. 2021;13(1):123.

26

Lu N, Wu Y, Zheng H, Yao X, Zhu Y, Cao W, Cheng T. An assessment of multi-view spectral information from UAV-based color-infrared images for improved estimation of nitrogen nutrition status in winter wheat. Precis Agric. 2022;23:1653–1674.

27

Duan T, Zheng B, Guo W, Ninomiya S, Guo Y, Chapman SC. Comparison of ground cover estimates from experiment plots in cotton, sorghum and sugarcane based on images and ortho-mosaics captured by UAV. Funct Plant Biol. 2017;44(1):169–183.

28

Guo W, Zheng B, Potgieter AB, Diot J, Watanabe K, Noshita K, Jordan DR, Wang X, Watson J, Ninomiya S, et al. Aerial imagery analysis—Quantifying appearance and number of sorghum heads for applications in breeding and agronomy. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1544.

29

Zhang Q, Liu Y, Gong C, Chen Y, Yu H. Applications of deep learning for dense scenes analysis in agriculture: A review. Sensors. 2020;20(5):1520.

30

Sarker IH. Deep learning: A comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions. SN Comput Sci. 2021;2(6):420.

31

Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc IEEE. 1998;86(11):2278–2324.

32

Sherstinsky A. Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Phys D Nonlin Phenom. 2020;404:132306.

33
Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y. Generative adversarial nets. In: Advances in neural information processing systems. Curran Associates Inc.; 2014 December 8-13; Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
34
Bank D, Koenigstein N, Giryes R, Autoencoders. arXiv (2020). ArXiv:2003.05991.
35

Lu Y, Chen D, Olaniyi E, Huang Y. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) for image augmentation in agriculture: A systematic review. Comput Electron Agric. 2022;200:107208.

36
Trang K, TonThat L, Minh Thao NG. Plant leaf disease identification by deep convolutional autoencoder as a feature extraction approach. In: 2020 17th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON):IEEE; 2020 Jun 24–27; Phuket, Thailand.
37

Khaki S, Wang L, Archontoulis SV. A CNN-RNN framework for crop yield prediction. Front Plant Sci. 2020;10:1750.

38

Zhou C, Hu J, Xu Z, Yue J, Ye H, Yang G. A monitoring system for the segmentation and grading of broccoli head based on deep learning and neural networks. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:402.

39

Blok PM, van Henten EJ, van Evert FK, Kootstra G. Image-based size estimation of broccoli heads under varying degrees of occlusion. Biosyst Eng. 2021;208:213–233.

40

Kierdorf J, Junker-Frohn LV, Delaney M, Olave MD, Burkart A, Jaenicke H, Muller O, Rascher U, Roscher R. GrowliFlower: An image time-series dataset for GROWth analysis of cauLIFLOWER. J Field Robot. 2022;40(2):173.

41

Desai SV, Balasubramanian VN, Fukatsu T, Ninomiya S, Guo W. Automatic estimation of heading date of paddy rice using deep learning. Plant Methods. 2019;15:76.

42
Nesteruk S, Shadrin D, Pukalchik M, Image augmentation for multitask few-shot learning: Agricultural domain use-case. arXiv (2021). ArXiv:2102.12295.
43

Ghosal S, Zheng B, Chapman SC, Potgieter AB, Jordan DR, Wang X, Singh AK, Singh A, Hirafuji M, Ninomiya S, et al. A weakly supervised deep learning framework for sorghum head detection and counting. Plant Phenomics. 2019;2019:1525874.

44

Mu Y, Fujii Y, Takata D, Zheng B, Noshita K, Honda K, Ninomiya S, Guo W. Characterization of peach tree crown by using high-resolution images from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Hortic Res. 2018;5:74.

45

Li Y, Wen W, Fan J, Gou W, Gu S, Lu X, Yu Z, Wang X, Guo X. Multi-source data fusion improves time-series phenotype accuracy in maize under a field high-throughput Phenotyping platform. Plant Phenomics. 2023;5:0043.

46

Wang H, Duan Y, Shi Y, Kato Y, Ninomiya S, Guo W. EasyIDP: A python package for intermediate data processing in UAV-based plant phenotyping. Remote Sens. 2021;13(13):2622.

47

Yu C, Gao C, Wang J, Yu G, Sang N. BiSeNet V2: Bilateral network with guided aggregation for real-time semantic segmentation. Int J Comput Vis. 2020;129:3051–3068.

48
Grevsen K. Effects of temperature on head growth of broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ):Parameter estimates for a predictive model. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 1997;73(2):235–244.
49

Cammarano D, Taylor MA, Thompson JA, Wright G, Faichney A, Haacker R, Orr A, White PJ. Predicting dates of head initiation and yields of broccoli crops grown throughout Scotland. Eur J Agron. 2020;116:126055.

50

Tassis LM, Tozzi de Souza JE, Krohling RA. A deep learning approach combining instance and semantic segmentation to identify diseases and pests of coffee leaves from in-field images. Comput Electron Agric. 2021;186:106191.

51
Osorio K, Puerto A, Pedraza C, Jamaica D, Rodríguez L. A deep learning approach for weed detection in lettuce crops using multispectral images. AgriEngineering. 2020;2:471.
52

Quine TA, Zhang Y. An investigation of spatial variation in soil erosion, soil properties, and crop production within an agricultural field in Devon, United Kingdom. J Soil Water Conserv. 2002;57(1):55–65.

Plant Phenomics
Article number: 0086
Cite this article:
Wang H, Li T, Nishida E, et al. Drone-Based Harvest Data Prediction Can Reduce On-Farm Food Loss and Improve Farmer Income. Plant Phenomics, 2023, 5: 0086. https://doi.org/10.34133/plantphenomics.0086

152

Views

6

Crossref

4

Web of Science

6

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 25 February 2023
Accepted: 14 August 2023
Published: 07 September 2023
© 2023 Haozhou Wang et al. Exclusive licensee Nanjing Agricultural University. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).

Return