AI Chat Paper
Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
{{expandStatus?'Exit ':''}}Advanced Search
Quantifying canopy light interception provides insight into the effects of plant spacing, canopy structure, and leaf orientation on radiation distribution. This is essential for increasing crop yield and improving product quality. Canopy light interception can be quantified using 3-dimensional (3D) plant models and optical simulations. However, virtual 3D canopy models (VCMs) have often been used to quantify canopy light interception because realistic 3D canopy models (RCMs) are difficult to obtain in the field. This study aims to compare the differences in light interception between VCMs and RCM. A realistic 3D maize canopy model (RCM) was reconstructed over a large area of the field using an advanced unmanned aerial vehicle cross-circling oblique (CCO) route and the structure from motion-multi-view stereo method. Three types of VCMs (VCM-1, VCM-4, and VCM-8) were then created by replicating 1, 4, and 8 individual realistic plants constructed by CCO in the center of the corresponding RCM. The daily light interception per unit area (DLI), as computed for the 3 VCMs, exhibited marked deviation from the RCM, as evinced by the relative root mean square error (rRMSE) values of 20.22%, 17.38%, and 15.48%, respectively. Although this difference decreased as the number of plants used to replicate the virtual canopy increased, rRMSE of DLI for VCM-8 and RCM still reached 15.48%. It was also found that the difference in light interception between RCMs and VCMs was substantially smaller in the early stage (48 days after sowing [DAS]) than in the late stage (70 DAS). This study highlights the importance of using RCM when calculating light interception in the field, especially in the later growth stages of plants.
Bodirsky B, Popp A, Lotze-Campen H, Dietrich J, Rolinski S, Weindl I, Schmitz C, Müller C, Bonsch M, Humpenöder F, et al. Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3858.
Dhankher OP, Foyer C. Climate resilient crops for improving global food security and safety. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41(5):877–884.
Cobb JN, DeClerck G, Greenberg A, Clark R, McCouch S. Next-generation phenotyping: Requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement. Theor Appli Gen. 2013;126:867–887.
Swarbreck S, Wang M, Wang Y, Kindred D, Sylvester-Bradley R, Shi W, Singh V, Bentley A, Griffiths H. A roadmap for lowering crop nitrogen requirement. Trends Plant Sci. 2019;24(10):892–904.
Purcell L, Ball R, Reaper J, Vories E. Radiation use efficiency and biomass production in soybean at different plant population densities. Crop Sci. 2002;42:172–177.
Niinemets Ü. Photosynthesis and resource distribution through plant canopies. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30:1052–1071.
Sarlikioti V, Visser P, Buck-Sorlin G, Marcelis LFM. How plant architecture affects light absorption and photosynthesis in tomato: Towards an ideotype for plant architecture using a functional–structural plant model. Ann Bot. 2011;108:1065–1073.
Kiniry J, Johnson M-V, Mitchell R, Vogel K, Kaiser J, Bruckerhoff S, Cordsiemon R. Switchgrass leaf area index and light extinction coefficients. Agron J. 2011;103(1):119–122.
Smith F, Sampson D, Long J. Notes: Comparison of leaf area index estimates from tree allometrics and measured light interception. Forest Sci. 1991;37:1682–1688.
Campillo Torres C, Prieto M, Daza Delgado C, Moñino M, García MI. Using digital images to characterize canopy coverage and light interception in a processing tomato crop. Hort Sci. 2008;43(6):1780–1786.
Purcell L. Soybean canopy coverage and light interception measurements using digital imagery. Crop Sci. 2000;40(3):834–837.
Baldocchi D, Collineau S, Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW. The physical nature of solar radiation in heterogeneous canopies: Spatial and temporal attributes. Exploi Environ Heterog Plants. 1994;21–71.
Kim D, Kang W, Hwang I, Kim J, Kim J, Park K, Son JE. Use of structurally-accurate 3D plant models for estimating light interception and photosynthesis of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) plants. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;177:105689.
Lee JW, Kang WH, Moon T, Hwang I, Kim D, Son JE. Estimating the leaf area index of bell peppers according to growth stage using ray-tracing simulation and a long short-term memory algorithm. Hort Environ Biotechnol. 2020;61:255–265.
Zheng B, Shi L, Ma Y, Deng Q, Baoguo L, Guo Y. Comparison of architecture among different cultivars of hybrid rice using a spatial light model based on 3-D digitising. Funct Plant Biol. 2008;35:900–910.
Bittner S, Gayler S, Biernath C, Winkler JB, Seifert S, Pretzsch H, Priesack E. Evaluation of a ray-tracing canopy light model based on terrestrial laser scans. Canadian J Remote Sens. 2012;38:619–628.
Disney MI, Lewis P, North PRJ. Monte Carlo ray tracing in optical canopy reflectance modelling. Remote Sens Rev. 2000;18:163–196.
Li S, Van der Werf W, Zhu J, Guo Y, Baoguo L, Ma Y, Evers J. Estimating the contribution of plant traits to light partitioning in simultaneous maize/soybean intercropping. J Exp Bot. 2021;72(10):3630–3646.
Ma Y, Chen Y, Zhu J, Meng L, Guo Y, Baoguo L. Coupling individual kernel-filling processes with source-sink interactions into GREENLAB-maize. Ann Bot. 2018;121(5):961–973.
De Reffye P, Heuvelink E, Guo Y, Hu B-G, Zhang B. Coupling process-based models and plant architectural models: A key issue for simulating crop production. Crop Model Decision Support. 2010;130–147.
Barillot R, Escobar-Gutiérrez A, Fournier C, Huynh P, Combes D. Assessing the effects of architectural variations on light partitioning within virtual wheat-pea mixtures. Ann Bot. 2014;114(4):725–737.
Dupuis J, Kuhlmann H. High-precision surface inspection: Uncertainty evaluation within an accuracy range of 15μm with triangulation-based laser line scanners. J Appl Geodesy. 2014;8:109–118.
Geng J. Structured-light 3D surface imaging: A tutorial. Adv Optic Photo. 2011;3:128–160.
Jin S, Su Y, Wu F, Pang S, Gao S, Hu T, Liu J, Guo Q. Stem-leaf segmentation and phenotypic trait extraction of individual maize using terrestrial LiDAR data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2018;57(3):1336–1346.
Xiao S, Chai H, Shao K, Shen M, Wang Q, Wang R, Sui Y, Ma Y. Image-based dynamic quantification of aboveground structure of sugar beet in field. Remote Sens (Basel). 2020;12:269–285.
Tölgyessy M, Dekan M, Chovanec Ľ, Hubinský P. Evaluation of the azure kinect and its comparison to kinect v1 and kinect v2. Sensors. 2021;21(2):413.
Paulus S, Schumann H, Kuhlmann H, Léon J. High-precision laser scanning system for capturing 3D plant architecture and analysing growth of cereal plants. Biosyst Eng. 2014;121:1–11.
Song Q, Zhang G, Zhu X-G. Optimal crop canopy architecture to maximise canopy photosynthetic CO2 uptake under elevated CO2—A theoretical study using a mechanistic model of canopy photosynthesis. Funct Plant Biol. 2013;40(2):108–124.
Zhu B, Liu F, Xie Z, Guo Y, Li B, Ma Y. Quantification of light interception within image-based 3-D reconstruction of sole and intercropped canopies over the entire growth season. Ann Bot. 2020;126(4):701–712.
Xiao S, Chai H, Wang Q, Shao K, Meng L, Wang R, Li B, Ma Y. Estimating economic benefit of sugar beet based on three-dimensional computer vision: A case study in Inner Mongolia China. European J Agron. 2021;130:126378.
Che Y, Wang Q, Xie Z, Zhou L, Li S, Hui F, Wang X, Baoguo L, Ma Y. Estimation of maize plant height and leaf area index dynamic using unmanned aerial vehicle with oblique and nadir photography. Ann Bot. 2020;126:765–773.
Che Y, Wang Q, Zhou L, Wang X, Baoguo L, Ma Y. The effect of growth stage and plant counting accuracy of maize inbred lines on LAI and biomass prediction. Precision Agric. 2022;1–27.
Liu F, Hu P, Zheng B, Duan T, Binglin Z, Guo Y. A field-based high-throughput method for acquiring canopy architecture using unmanned aerial vehicle images. Agric For Meteorol. 2021;296:108231.
Xiao S, Ye Y, Fei S, Chen H, Zhang B, Li Q, Cai Z, Che Y, Wang Q, Ghafoor A, et al. High-throughput calculation of organ-scale traits with reconstructed accurate 3D canopy structures using a UAV RGB camera with an advanced cross-circling oblique route. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2023;201:104–122.
Vosselman G. Slope based filtering of laser altimetry data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens. 2000;33:935–942.
Rusu RB, Marton ZC, Blodow N, Dolha M, Beetz M. Towards 3D point cloud based object maps for household environments. Robot Auton Syst. 2008;56:927–941.
Pebesma EJ. Simple features for R: Standardized support for spatial vector data. R J. 2018;10(1):439–446.
Lindsay JB. Whitebox GAT: A case study in geomorphometric analysis. Comput Geosci. 2016;95:75–84.
Jung J, Che E, Olsen MJ, Shafer KC. Automated and efficient powerline extraction from laser scanning data using a voxel-based subsampling with hierarchical approach. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2020;163:343–361.
Bailey BN. Helios: A scalable 3D plant and environmental biophysical modeling framework. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1185.
Bailey BN. A reverse ray-tracing method for modelling the net radiative flux in leaf-resolving plant canopy simulations. Ecol Model. 2018;368:233–245.
Gueymard CA. REST2: High-performance solar radiation model for cloudless-sky irradiance, illuminance, and photosynthetically active radiation—Validation with a benchmark dataset. Solar Energy. 2008;82:272–285.
Liu F, Song Q, Zhao J, Linxiong M, Bu H, Hu Y, Zhu XG. Canopy occupation volume as an indicator of canopy photosynthetic capacity. New Phytol. 2021;232(2):941–956.
Wilson JA, Bender A, Kaya T, Clemons PA. Alpha shapes applied to molecular shape characterization exhibit novel properties compared to established shape descriptors. J Chem Inf Model. 2009;49:2231–2241.
Kendig K. Is a 2000-year-old formula still keeping some secrets? Am Math Monthly. 2000;107(5):402–415.
Zhang Y, Henke M, Li Y, Xu D, Liu A, Liu X, Li T. Analyzing the impact of greenhouse planting strategy and plant architecture on tomato plant physiology and estimated dry matter. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:828252.
de Mattos EM, Binkley D, Campoe OC, Alvares CA, Stape JL. Variation in canopy structure, leaf area, light interception and light use efficiency among eucalyptus clones. For Ecol Manage 2020;463:118038.
Niinemets Ü. A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance. Ecol Res. 2010;25:693–714.
Zotz G, Reichling P, Valladares F. A simulation study on the importance of size-related changes in leaf morphology and physiology for carbon gain in an epiphytic bromeliad. Ann Bot. 2002;90(4):437–443.
Stewart D, Costa C, Dwyer L, Smith D, Hamilton R, Ma B. Canopy structure, light interception, and photosynthesis in maize. Agron J. 2003;95:1465–1474.
Li J, Xie R, Wang K, Hou P, Ming B, Zhang G, Liu G, Wu M, Yang Z, Li S. Response of canopy structure, light interception and grain yield to plant density in maize. J Agric Sci. 2018;156:785–794.
Zhang Y, Yang J, Van Haaften M, Li L, Lu S, Wen W, Zheng X, Pan J, Qian T. Interactions between diffuse light and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) canopy structure, simulations of light interception in virtual canopies. Agronomy. 2022;12(3):602.
Chen S, Shao B, Impens I, Ceulemans R. Effects of plant canopy structure on light interception and photosynthesis. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf. 1994;52:115–123.
Fiorucci A-S, Fankhauser C. Plant strategies for enhancing access to sunlight. Curr Biol. 2017;27(17):R931–R940.
Jin S, Su Y, Song S, Xu K, Hu T, Yang Q, Wu F, Xu G, Ma Q, Guan H, et al. Non-destructive estimation of field maize biomass using terrestrial lidar: An evaluation from plot level to individual leaf level. Plant Methods. 2020;16:1–19.
Jin S, Su Y, Gao S, Wu F, Ma Q, Xu K, Hu T, Liu J, Pang S, Guan H, et al. Separating the structural components of maize for field phenotyping using terrestrial LiDAR data and deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2019;58(4):2644–2658.
Sheng W, Wen W, Xiao B, Guo X, Du JJ, Wang C, Wang Y. An accurate skeleton extraction approach from 3D point clouds of maize plants. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:248.
Li D, Bai D, Tian Y, Li Y, Zhao C, Wang Q, Guo S, Gu Y, Luan X, Wang R, et al. Time series canopy phenotyping enables the identification of genetic variants controlling dynamic phenotypes in soybean. J Integr Plant Biol. 2022;65(1):117–132.
Hassan M, Mengjiao Y, Fu L, Rasheed A, Zheng B, Xia X, Xiao Y, He Z. Accuracy assessment of plant height using an unmanned aerial vehicle for quantitative genomic analysis in bread wheat. Plant Methods. 2019;15(1):1–12.
Li Y, Wen W, Miao T, Sheng W, Yu Z, Wang X, Guo X, Zhao C. Automatic organ-level point cloud segmentation of maize shoots by integrating high-throughput data acquisition and deep learning. Comput Electron Agric. 2022;193:106702.
Araus JL, Cairns JE. Field high-throughput phenotyping: The new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19:52–61.
Haghighattalab A, González Pérez L, Mondal S, Singh D, Schinstock D, Rutkoski J, Ortiz-Monasterio I, Singh RP, Goodin D, Poland J. Application of unmanned aerial systems for high throughput phenotyping of large wheat breeding nurseries. Plant Methods. 2016;12:1–15.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
京公网安备11010802044758号