AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

A Mechanistic Model for Estimating Rice Photosynthetic Capacity and Stomatal Conductance from Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Hao Ding1,Zihao Wang1,Yongguang Zhang2( )Ji Li2Li Jia3Qiting Chen3Yanfeng Ding1Songhan Wang1( )
Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
International Institute for Earth System Sciences, Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

†These author contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Enhancing the photosynthetic rate is one of the effective ways to increase rice yield, given that photosynthesis is the basis of crop productivity. At the leaf level, crops’ photosynthetic rate is mainly determined by photosynthetic functional traits including the maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) and stomatal conductance (gs). Accurate quantification of these functional traits is important to simulate and predict the growth status of rice. In recent studies, the emerging sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) provides us an unprecedented opportunity to estimate crops’ photosynthetic traits, owing to its direct and mechanistic links to photosynthesis. Therefore, in this study, we proposed a practical semimechanistic model to estimate the seasonal Vcmax and gs time-series based on SIF. We firstly generated the coupling relationship between the open ratio of photosystem II (qL) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), then estimate the electron transport rate (ETR) based on the proposed mechanistic relationship between SIF and ETR. Finally, Vcmax and gs were estimated by linking to ETR based on the principle of evolutionary optimality and the photosynthetic pathway. Validation with field observations showed that our proposed model can estimate Vcmax and gs with high accuracy (R2 > 0.8). Compared to simple linear regression model, the proposed model could increase the accuracy of Vcmax estimates by >40%. Therefore, the proposed method effectively enhanced the estimation accuracy of crops’ functional traits, which sheds new light on developing high-throughput monitoring techniques to estimate plant functional traits, and also can improve our understating of crops’ physiological response to climate change.

References

1

Ort DR, Merchant SS, Alric J, Barkan A, Blankenship RE, Bock R, Croce R, Hanson MR, Hibberd JM, Long SP, et al. Redesigning photosynthesis to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demand. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(28):8529–8536.

2

Murchie EH, Pinto M, Horton P. Agriculture and the new challenges for photosynthesis research. New Phytol. 2009;181(3):532–552.

3

Hubbart S, Peng S, Horton P, Chen Y, Murchie EH. Trends in leaf photosynthesis in historical rice varieties developed in the Philippines since 1966. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(12):3429–3438.

4

Sunil KKR, Addie MT, James CS. Advances in plant phenomics: From data and algorithms to biological insights. Appl Plant Sci. 2020;8(8): e11386.

5

Beerling DJ, Quick WP. A new technique for estimating rates of carboxylation and electron transport in leaves of C3 plants for use in dynamic global vegetation models. Glob Chang Biol. 1995;1(4):289–294.

6

Christina MC, Chase MM, Juliana SM. Special issue-functional trait evolution: The evolution of functional traits in plants: Is the giant still sleeping? Int J Plant Sci. 2020;181(1):44–55.

7

Ninomiya S, Baret F, Cheng ZM. Plant phenomics: Emerging transdisciplinary Science. Plant Phenomics. 2019;2019:2765120.

8

Borjigidai A, Hikosaka K, Hirose T, Hasegawa T, Okada M, Kobayashi K. Seasonal changes in temperature dependence of photosynthetic rate in rice under a free-air CO2 enrichment. Ann Bot. 2006;97(4):549–557.

9

Quebbeman JA, Ramirez JA. Optimal allocation of leaf-level nitrogen: Implications for covariation of Vcmax and Jmax and photosynthetic downregulation. J Geophys Res Biogeo. 2016;121(9):2464–2475.

10

von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta. 1981;153(4):376–387.

11
Berry J, Farquhar G. The CO2 concentrating function of C4 photosynthesis. A biochemical model. 1977.
12

Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta. 1980;149(1):78–90.

13

Lu X, Ju W, Li J, Croft H, Chen JM, Luo Y, Yu H, Hu H. Maximum carboxylation rate estimation with chlorophyll content as a proxy of rubisco content. J Geophys Res Biogeo. 2020;125(8):e2020JG005748.

14

Peisker M. Ein Modell der Sauerstoffabhängigkeit des photosynthetischen CO2-Gaswechsels von C3-Pflanzen. Kulturpflanze. 1976;24(1):221–235.

15

Kaiser E, Kromdijk J, Harbinson J, Heuvelink E, Marcelis LFM. Photosynthetic induction and its diffusional, carboxylation and electron transport processes as affected by CO2 partial pressure, temperature, air humidity and blue irradiance. Ann Bot. 2017;119(1):191–205.

16

Walker AP, Beckerman AP, Gu L, Kattge J, Cernusak LA, Domingues TF, Scales JC, Wohlfahrt G, Wullschleger SD, Woodward FI. The relationship of leaf photosynthetic traits –Vcmax and Jmax– to leaf nitrogen, leaf phosphorus, and specific leaf area: A meta-analysis and modeling study. Ecol Evol. 2014;4(16):3218–3235.

17

Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature. 2004;428(6985):821–827.

18

Wullschleger SD. Biochemical limitations to carbon assimilation in C3 plants—A retrospective analysis of the A/Ci curves from 109 species. J Exp Bot. 1993;44(5):907–920.

19

Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 1982;33:317–345.

20

Rogers A, Medlyn BE, Dukes JS, Bonan G, Caemmerer S, Dietze MC, Kattge J, Leakey ADB, Mercado LM, Niinemets Ü, et al. A roadmap for improving the representation of photosynthesis in Earth system models. New Phytol. 2017;213(1):22–42.

21

Yu Y, Piao J, Fan W, Yang X. Modified photochemical reflectance index to estimate leaf maximum rate of carboxylation based on spectral analysis. Environ Monit Assess. 2020;192(12):788.

22

Li Z-K, Zhang F. Rice breeding in the post-genomics era: From concept to practice. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2013;16(2):261–269.

23

Mohammed GH, Colombo R, Middleton EM, Rascher U, van der Tol C, Nedbal L, Goulas Y, Pérez-Priego O, Damm A, Meroni M, et al. Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (Sif) in vegetation:50 years of progress. Remote Sens Environ. 2019;231:111177.

24

Porcar-Castell A, Malenovský Z, Magney T, van Wittenberghe S, Fernández-Marín B, Maignan F, Zhang Y, Maseyk K, Atherton J, Albert LP, et al. Chlorophyll a fluorescence illuminates a path connecting plant molecular biology to Earth-System Science. Nat Plants. 2021;7(8):998–1009.

25

Camino C, Gonzalez-Dugo V, Hernandez P, Zarco-Tejada PJ. Radiative transfer Vcmax estimation from hyperspectral imagery and sif retrievals to assess photosynthetic performance in rainfed and irrigated plant phenotyping trials. Remote Sens Environ. 2019;231:111186.

26

Fu P, Meacham-Hensold K, Siebers MH, Bernacchi CJ. The inverse relationship between solar-induced fluorescence yield and photosynthetic capacity: Benefits for field phenotyping. J Exp Bot. 2021;72(4):1295–1306.

27

Porcar-Castell A, Tyystjärvi E, Atherton J, van der Tol C, Flexas J, Pfündel EE, Moreno J, Frankenberg C, Berry JA. Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: Mechanisms and challenges. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(15):4065–4095.

28

Zhang Y, Guanter L, Berry JA, Joiner J, van der Tol C, Huete A, Gitelson A, Voigt M, Köhler P. Estimation of vegetation photosynthetic capacity from space-based measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence for terrestrial biosphere models. Glob Chang Biol. 2014;20(12):3727–3742.

29

Gu L, Han J, Wood J, Chang CYY, Sun Y. Sun-induced chl fluorescence and its importance for biophysical modeling of photosynthesis based on light reactions. New Phytol. 2019;223(3):1179–1191.

30

Smith NG, Keenan TF. Mechanisms underlying leaf photosynthetic acclimation to warming and elevated CO2 as inferred from least-cost optimality theory. Glob Chang Biol. 2020;26(9):5202–5216.

31

Shan N, Zhang Y, Chen JM, Ju W, Migliavacca M, Peñuelas J, Yang X, Zhang Z, Nelson JA, Goulas Y. A model for estimating transpiration from remotely sensed solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. Remote Sens Environ. 2021;252:112134.

32

Li J, Zhang Y, Gu L, Li Z, Li J, Zhang Q, Zhang Z, Song L. Seasonal variations in the relationship between sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic capacity from the leaf to canopy level in a rice crop. J Exp Bot. 2020;71(22):7179–7197.

33

Yang X, Shi H, Stovall A, Guan K, Miao G, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Xiao X, Ryu Y, Lee JE. FluoSpec 2—An automated field spectroscopy system to monitor canopy solar-induced fluorescence. Sensors. 2018;18(7):2063.

34

Li Z, Zhang Q, Li J, Yang X, Wu Y, Zhang Z, Wang S, Wang H, Zhang Y. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and its link to canopy photosynthesis in maize from continuous ground measurements. Remote Sens Environ. 2020;236:111420.

35
Alonso L, Gómez-Chova L, Vila-Francés J, Amoros-Lopez J, Guanter L, Calpe J, Moreno J, Sensitivity analysis of the Fraunhofer line discrimination method for the measurement of chlorophyll fluorescence using a field spectroradiometer. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium; Barcelona, Spain; 2007 July 23–28; p. 3756–3759.
36

Alonso L, Gomez-Chova L, Vila-Frances J, Amoros-Lopez J, Guanter L, Calpe J, Moreno JÉ. Improved Fraunhofer Line Discrimination method for vegetation fluorescence quantification. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2008;5:620–624.

37

van der Tol C, Verhoef W, Rosema A. A model for chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis at leaf scale. Agric For Meteorol. 2008;149(1):96–105.

38

van der Tol C, Berry JA, Campbell PKE, Rascher U. Models of fluorescence and photosynthesis for interpreting measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. J Geophys Res Biogeo. 2014;119(12):2312–2327.

39

Yelu Z, Grayson B, Benjamin D, Youngryel R, Min C. A practical approach for estimating the escape ratio of near-infrared solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. Remote Sens Environ. 2019;232:111209.

40

Smith NG, Keenan TF, Colin Prentice I, Wang H, Wright IJ, Niinemets Ü, Crous KY, Domingues TF, Guerrieri R, Yoko Ishida F, et al. Global photosynthetic capacity is optimized to the environment. Ecol Lett. 2019;22(3):506–517.

41

Flexas J, Medrano H. Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Ann Bot. 2002;89(2):183–189.

42

Genty B, Briantais J, Baker NR. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 1989;990(1):87–92.

43

Guan K, Berry JA, Zhang Y, Joiner J, Guanter L, Badgley G, Lobell DB. Improving the monitoring of crop productivity using spaceborne solar-induced fluorescence. Glob Chang Biol. 2016;22(2):716–726.

44

Weis E, Berry JA. Quantum efficiency of photosystem II in relation to ‘energy’-dependent quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987;894(2):198–208.

45

Edwards GE, Baker NR. Can CO2 assimilation in maize leaves be predicted accurately from chlorophyll fluorescence analysis? Photosynth Res. 1993;37(2):89–102.

46

Zaks J, Amarnath K, Kramer DM, Niyogi KK, Fleming GR. A kinetic model of rapidly reversible nonphotochemical quenching. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(39):15757–15762.

47
Jee G. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, Volume 19: ‘Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis’, edited by George C. Papageorgiou and Govindjee. Photosynth Res. 2005;83(1):101–105.
48

Joiner J, Guanter L, Lindstrot R, Voigt M, Vasilkov AP, Middleton EM, Huemmrich KF, Yoshida Y, Frankenberg C. Global monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from moderate-spectral-resolution near-infrared satellite measurements: Methodology, simulations, and application to gome-2. Atmos Meas Tech. 2013;6(10):2803–2823.

49

Guanter L, Frankenberg C, Dudhia A, Lewis PE, Gómez-Dans J, Kuze A, Suto H, Grainger RG. Retrieval and global assessment of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from gosat space measurements. Remote Sens Environ. 2012;121:236–251.

50

Frankenberg C, Fisher JB, Worden J, Badgley G, Saatchi SS, Lee JE, Toon GC, Butz A, Jung M, Kuze A, et al. New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: Patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity. Geophys Res Lett. 2011;38(17):L17706.

51
Han J, Chang CYY, Gu L, Zhang Y, Meeker EW, Magney TS, Walker AP, Wen J, Kira O, McNaull S, et al. The physiological basis for estimating photosynthesis from Chl a fluorescence. New Phytol. 234(4):1206–1219.
52

Yang P, van der Tol C. Linking canopy scattering of far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence with reflectance. Remote Sens Environ. 2018;209:456–467.

53
Von Caemmerer S. Biochemical models of leaf photosynthesis. Csiro Publishing; 2000.
54

Wolf A, Anderegg WRL, Pacala SW. Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(46):E7222–E7230.

55

Katja G, Christian F, Troy SM, Stephen CH, Ulrike S, Jochen S. Photospec: A new instrument to measure spatially distributed red and far-red solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. Remote Sens Environ. 2018;216:311–327.

56

Martínez-Ferri E, Balaguer L, Valladares F, Chico JM, Manrique E. Energy dissipation in drought-avoiding and drought-tolerant tree species at midday during the Mediterranean summer. Tree Physiol. 2000;20(2):131–138.

57

Wang S, Zhang Y, Ju W, Wu M, Liu L, He W, Peñuelas J. Temporally corrected long-term satellite solar-induced fluorescence leads to improved estimation of global trends in vegetation photosynthesis during 1995–2018. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2022;194:222–234.

Plant Phenomics
Article number: 0047
Cite this article:
Ding H, Wang Z, Zhang Y, et al. A Mechanistic Model for Estimating Rice Photosynthetic Capacity and Stomatal Conductance from Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence. Plant Phenomics, 2023, 5: 0047. https://doi.org/10.34133/plantphenomics.0047

138

Views

5

Crossref

4

Web of Science

5

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 23 October 2022
Accepted: 12 April 2023
Published: 09 May 2023
© 2023 Hao Ding et al. Exclusive licensee Nanjing Agricultural University. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).

Return