AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Determination of Fv/Fm from Chlorophyll a Fluorescence without Dark Adaptation by an LSSVM Model

Qian Xia1Hao Tang1Lijiang Fu1Jinglu Tan2Govindjee Govindjee3Ya Guo1( )
Key Laboratory of Advanced Process Control for Light Industry, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
Department of Biomedical, Biological and Chemical Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Center of Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Evaluation of photosynthetic quantum yield is important for analyzing the phenotype of plants. Chlorophyll a fluorescence (ChlF) has been widely used to estimate plant photosynthesis and its regulatory mechanisms. The ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence, Fv/Fm, obtained from a ChlF induction curve, is commonly used to reflect the maximum photochemical quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII), but it is measured after a sample is dark-adapted for a long time, which limits its practical use. In this research, a least-squares support vector machine (LSSVM) model was developed to explore whether Fv/Fm can be determined from ChlF induction curves measured without dark adaptation. A total of 7,231 samples of 8 different experiments, under diverse conditions, were used to train the LSSVM model. Model evaluation with different samples showed excellent performance in determining Fv/Fm from ChlF signals without dark adaptation. Computation time for each test sample was less than 4 ms. Further, the prediction performance of test dataset was found to be very desirable: a high correlation coefficient (0.762 to 0.974); a low root mean squared error (0.005 to 0.021); and a residual prediction deviation of 1.254 to 4.933. These results clearly demonstrate that Fv/Fm, the widely used ChlF induction feature, can be determined from measurements without dark adaptation of samples. This will not only save experiment time but also make Fv/Fm useful in real-time and field applications. This work provides a high-throughput method to determine the important photosynthetic feature through ChlF for phenotyping plants.

References

1

Hohmann-Marriott MF, Blankenship RE. Evolution of photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62:515–548.

2

Stirbet A, Lazár D, Guo Y, Govindjee G. Photosynthesis: basics, history and modelling. Ann Bot-London. 2020;126(4):511–537.

3

Nelson M, Ben-Shem A. The complex architecture of oxygenic photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;5(12):971–982.

4

Fleming GR, Van Grondelle R. The primary steps of photosynthesis. Physics Today. 1994;47(2):48–57.

5

Gorbunov MY, Falkowski PG. Using chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics to determine photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr. 2020;66(1):1–3.

6

Kalaji HM, Schansker G, Ladle RJ, Goltsev V, Bosa K, Allakhverdiev SI, Brestic M, Bussotti F, Calatayud A, Dabrowski P, et al. Frequently asked questions about in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence: Practical issues. Photosynth Res. 2014;122:121–158.

7

Guo Y, Tan J. Recent advances in the application of chlorophyll a fluorescence from photosystem II. Photochem Photobiol. 2015;91(1):1–14.

8

Maxwell K, Johnson GN. Chlorophyll fluorescence—A practical guide. J Exp Bot. 2000;51(345):659–668.

9

Murchie EH, Lawson T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: A guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(13):3983–3998.

10

Stirbet A, Riznichenko GY, Rubin AB, Govindjee G. Modeling chlorophyll a fluorescence transient: relation to photosynthesis. Biochemistry Mosc. 2014;79:291–323.

11
Stirbet A, Lazár D, Papageorgiou GC, Govindjee G. Chlorophyll a fluorescence in cyanobacteria: relation to photosynthesis. In: Mishra AN, Tiwari DN, Rai AN, editors. Cyanobacteria: From basic science to applications. London: Academic Press; 2019. Chapter 5, p. 79–130.
12

Lazár D. Parameters of photosynthetic energy partitioning. J Plant Physiol. 2015;175:131–147.

13

Baker NR. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:89–113.

14

Malnoë A. Photoinhibition or photoprotection of photosynthesis? Update on the (newly termed) sustained quenching component qH. Environ Exp Bot. 2018;154:123–133.

15

Faseela P, Sinisha AK, Brestič M, Puthur JT. Chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters as indicators of a particular abiotic stress in rice. Photosynthetica. 2019;57(SI):108–115.

16

Bano H, Athar HUR, Zafar ZU, Kalaji HM, Ashraf M. Linking changes in chlorophyll a fluorescence with drought stress susceptibility in mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Physiol Plantarum. 2021;172(2):1244–1254.

17

Song Y, Wang J, Wang L. Satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence reveals heat stress impacts on wheat yield in India. Remote Sens. 2020;12(20):3277.

18

Xia Q, Tan J, Ji X, Jiang Y, Guo Y. Modelling and simulation of chlorophyll fluorescence from photosystem II as affected by temperature. IET Syst Biol. 2018;12(6):304–310.

19

Arikan B, Ozfidan-Konakci C, Yildiztugay E, Turan M, Cavusoglu H. Polystyrene nanoplastic contamination mixed with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Alleviation on gas exchange, water management, chlorophyll fluorescence and antioxidant capacity in wheat. Environ Pollut. 2022;311:119851.

20

Sarafi E, Chatzissavvidis C, Therios I. Response of two pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars to six boron concentrations: Growth performance, nutrient status, gas exchange parameters, chlorophyll fluorescence, and proline and carbohydrate content. J Plant Nutr. 2017;40:983–994.

21

Rousseau C, Belin E, Bove E, Rousseau D, Fabre F, Berruyer R, Guillaumès J, Manceau C, Jacques MA, Boureau T. High throughput quantitative phenotyping of plant resistance using chlorophyll fluorescence image analysis. Plant Methods. 2013;9(1):1–13.

22

Sun D, Robbins K, Morales N, Shu Q, Cen H. Advances in optical phenotyping of cereal crops. Trends Plant Sci. 2022;27(2):191–208.

23

Krause GH. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis. An evaluation of damaging and protective mechanisms. Physiol Plantarum. 1988;74(3):566–574.

24

Stirbet A, Lazár D, Kromdijk J, Govindjee G. Chlorophyll a fluorescence induction: Can just a one-second measurement be used to quantify abiotic stress responses? Photosynthetica. 2018;56:86–104.

25

Padhi B, Chauhan G, Kandoi D, Stirbet A, Tripathy BC, Govindjee G. A comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence transient measurements, using Handy PEA and FluorPen fluorometers. Photosynthetica. 2021;59:39–48.

26

Kitajima M, Butler WL. Quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and primary photochemistry in chloroplasts by dibromothymoquinone. BBA-Bioenergetics. 1975;376:105–115.

27

Öquist G, Chow WS, Anderson JM. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis represents a mechanism for the long-term regulation of photosystem II. Planta. 1992;186(3):450–460.

28

Kalaji HM, Schansker G, Brestic M, Bussotti F, Calatayud A, Ferroni L, Goltsev V, Guidi L, Jajoo A, Li P, et al. Frequently asked questions about chlorophyll fluorescence, the sequel. Photosynth Res. 2017;132:13–66.

29

Krause GH, Weis E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basics. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 1991;42:313–349.

30

Zhou R, Hyldgaard B, Yu X, Rosenqvist E, Ugarte RM, Yu S, Wu Z, Ottosen C, Zhao T. Phenotyping of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) under cold and heat stresses using chlorophyll fluorescence. Euphytica. 2018;214(4):Article 68.

31

Perri KA, Manning SR, Watson SB, Fowler NL, Boyer GL. Dark adaptation and ability of pulse-amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorometry to identify nutrient limitation in the bloom-forming cyanobacterium, Microcystis aeruginosa (Kützing). J Photoch Photobio B. 2021;219:112186.

32

Buwalda JG, Noga G. Intra-plant differences in leaf chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in perennial fruiting plants. New Zeal J Crop Hort. 1994;22(4):373–380.

33

Samborska IA, Alexandrov V, Sieczko L, Kornatowska B, Goltsev V, Cetner MD, Kalaji HM. Artifificial neural networks and their application in biological and agricultural research. J Nano Photo Bio Sciences. 2014;2:14–30.

34

Tyystjärvi E, Nørremark M, Mattila H, Keränen M, Hakala-Yatkin M, Ottosen CO, Rosenqvist E. Automatic identification of crop and weed species with chlorophyll fluorescence induction curves. Precis Agric. 2011;12(4):546–563.

35

Keränen M, Aro EM, Tyystjärvi E, Nevalainen O. Automatic plant identification with chlorophyll fluorescence fingerprinting. Precis Agric. 2003;4:53–67.

36

Goltsev V, Zaharieva I, Chernev P, Kouzmanova M, Kalaji HM, Yordanov I, Krasteva V, Alexandrov V, Stefanov D, Allakhverdiev SI, et al. Drought-induced modifications of photosynthetic electron transport in intact leaves: Analysis and use of neural networks as a tool for a rapid non-invasive estimation. BBA-Bioenergetics. 2012;1817:1490–1498.

37

Yao J, Sun D, Cen H, Xu H, Weng H, Yuan F, He Y. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis drought stress response using kinetic chlorophyll fluorescence and multicolor fluorescence imaging. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:603.

38

Han B, Wang J, Li Y, Ma X, Jo S, Cui D, Wang Y, Park D, Song Y, Cao G, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with drought tolerance traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under PEG and field drought stress. Euphytica. 2018;214:Article 74.

39

McAusland L, Atkinson JA, Lawson T, Murchie EH. High throughput procedure utilising chlorophyll fluorescence imaging to phenotype dynamic photosynthesis and photoprotection in leaves under controlled gaseous conditions. Plant Methods. 2019;15(1):1–15.

40

Faried M, Samer M, Abdelsalam E, Yousef RS, Attia YA, Ali AS. Biodiesel production from microalgae: Processes, technologies and recent advancements. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;79:893–913.

41

Sassano CEN, Gioielli LA, Ferreira LS, Rodrigues MS, Sato S, Converti A, Carvalho JCM. Evaluation of the composition of continuously-cultivated Arthrospira (spirulina) platensis using ammonium chloride as nitrogen source. Biomass Bioenergy. 2010;34(12):1732–1738.

42

Chang CW, Laird DA, Mausbach MJ, Hurburgh CR Jr. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy–principal components regression analyses of soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2001;65(2):480–490.

43

Papageorgiou GC, Tsimilli-Michael M, Stamatakis K. The fast and slow kinetics of chlorophyll a fluorescence induction in plants, algae and cyanobacteria: A viewpoint. Photosynth Res. 2007;94:275–290.

44

Azadnia R, Jahanbakhshi A, Rashidi S, Khajehzadeh M, Bazyar P. Developing an automated monitoring system for fast and accurate prediction of soil texture using an image-based deep learning network and machine vision system. Measurement. 2022;190:110669.

45

Tao T, Liu Y, Qiao Y, Gao L, Lu J, Zhang C, Wang Y. Wind turbine blade icing diagnosis using hybrid features and stacked-XGBoost algorithm. Renew Energ. 2021;180:1004–1013.

46

Wang DN, Li L, Zhao D. Corporate finance risk prediction based on LightGBM. Inform Sciences. 2022;602:259–268.

47

Li F, Jia D, Kai L. ImageNet: Constructing a large-scale image database. J Vision. 2009;9:1037–1037.

Plant Phenomics
Article number: 0034
Cite this article:
Xia Q, Tang H, Fu L, et al. Determination of Fv/Fm from Chlorophyll a Fluorescence without Dark Adaptation by an LSSVM Model. Plant Phenomics, 2023, 5: 0034. https://doi.org/10.34133/plantphenomics.0034

138

Views

17

Crossref

17

Web of Science

20

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 06 October 2022
Accepted: 26 February 2023
Published: 30 March 2023
© 2023 Qian Xia et al. Exclusive licensee Nanjing Agricultural University. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).

Return