Journal Home > Volume 6 , Issue 4

With the deepening application of blockchain technology, exaggerating its empowering effects has become common. In recent years, the rational assessment of the maturity of blockchain technology applications in digital projects in different fields has been the focus of attention and identified as the key to improving the implementation effect of various digital projects. Although some studies have obtained substantial research results on technology maturity and its derivative applications, which can be used to predict the overall trend of a technology or guide the implementation of the technology on the ground, few studies have evaluated the maturity of blockchain technology in combination with different application scenarios. Our study combines application scenarios and the technical characteristics of blockchain technology and proposes an evaluation system for blockchain technology application maturity consisting of five primary indicators, that is, key application requirements, data security, process complexity, application ecological completeness, and technical performance requirements, and their corresponding secondary indicators. In addition, we take digital government public service projects as application scenarios and use the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) entropy method and expert scoring method to determine the weights corresponding to each index in the assessment system and construct a blockchain technology application maturity assessment model. Moreover, we apply the model to ten typical digital government public service projects to conduct a comprehensive assessment and analysis. By comparing the indicator scores of the different projects, we analyze the project characteristics influencing blockchain technology application maturity and provide suggestions for applying “blockchain + digital government public services”.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Blockchain Technology Application Maturity Assessment Model for Digital Government Public Service Projects

Show Author's information Yutao Yang1Yuxuan Shi1Tianmei Wang1( )
School of Information, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100098, China

Abstract

With the deepening application of blockchain technology, exaggerating its empowering effects has become common. In recent years, the rational assessment of the maturity of blockchain technology applications in digital projects in different fields has been the focus of attention and identified as the key to improving the implementation effect of various digital projects. Although some studies have obtained substantial research results on technology maturity and its derivative applications, which can be used to predict the overall trend of a technology or guide the implementation of the technology on the ground, few studies have evaluated the maturity of blockchain technology in combination with different application scenarios. Our study combines application scenarios and the technical characteristics of blockchain technology and proposes an evaluation system for blockchain technology application maturity consisting of five primary indicators, that is, key application requirements, data security, process complexity, application ecological completeness, and technical performance requirements, and their corresponding secondary indicators. In addition, we take digital government public service projects as application scenarios and use the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) entropy method and expert scoring method to determine the weights corresponding to each index in the assessment system and construct a blockchain technology application maturity assessment model. Moreover, we apply the model to ten typical digital government public service projects to conduct a comprehensive assessment and analysis. By comparing the indicator scores of the different projects, we analyze the project characteristics influencing blockchain technology application maturity and provide suggestions for applying “blockchain + digital government public services”.

Keywords: blockchain, digital government public services, technical maturity, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), AHP-entropy weight method

References(27)

[1]
D. Tapscott and A. Tapscott, Blockchain Revolution, (in Chinese). Beijing, China: CITIC Publishing, 2016.
[2]

S. Wang, Digital government governance in China: Reality and prospects, Journal of the Party School of Guizhou Province, no. 3, pp. 87–95, 2019.

[3]

X. Y. Zhang and A. X. Fan, A review of artificial intelligence based on technology maturity curve, (in Chinese), Philosophy of Science and Technology Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 14–19, 2019.

[4]

S. Xu, A generic definition of technology maturity, Dual-Use Technologies and Products, no. 11, pp. 8–10, 2016.

[5]

J. Deng, S. Ye, and X. Zheng, A review of software maturity model (CMM) development, (in Chinese), Computer Application Research, no. 7, pp. 6–9, 2002.

[6]

J. Ji, K. Huang, Z. Gu, Y. Liu, S. Zhu, N. Li, and F. Ren, Empirical analysis of the relevance of Gartner trend forecast reports to scientific research, (in Chinese), Library Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 54–62, 2016.

[7]

Research group on using blockchain to promote modernization of tax administration, Exploring the innovation of “Internet+taxation” based on blockchain: The practice of Shenzhen taxation bureau as an example, Taxation Research, no. 1, pp. 68–73, 2019.

[8]

S. Wang, Governance theory in the digital age: Background, content and brief comments, (in Chinese), Foreign Social Science, no. 2, pp. 96–104, 2019.

[9]

K. Wu and X. Yan, Digital governance-driven and public service provision model change —based on the practice of Guangdong province, E-Government, no. 1, pp. 76–83, 2020.

[10]

J. Ye and Y. Wang, Exploring the path of public service supply-side reform in the context of the new era —Taking Suzhou city as an example, Administrative Tribune, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 56–61, 2018.

[11]

M. Wang and J. Lu, Research on blockchain technology and its application in government governance, E-Government, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2018.

[12]
M. Swan, Blockchain: Blueprint for A New Economy. Boston, MA, USA: O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2015.
[13]

Y. Tang, Q. Chen, and L. Man, Capitalization, fiscal incentives and local public service delivery —An empirical analysis based on 35 large and medium-sized cities in China, (in Chinese), Economics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 217–240, 2016.

[14]

J. Liu and H. Wei, The effect of urban public services on permanent migration intention of floating population, Economic Management Journal, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 20–37, 2019.

[15]

X. Yang, The impact of urban public service quality on population mobility, China Journal of Population Science, no. 2, pp. 104–114, 2017.

[16]

R. B. Liang and Y. Tang, Tiebout model in the supply of local public goods: An empirical study based on urban housing prices in China, World Economy, no. 10, pp. 71–83, 2008.

[17]

L. Yin, Basic public services: Theory, current situation and countermeasures analysis, (in Chinese), Political Science Research, no. 5, pp. 83–96&127, 2016.

[18]
D. Kong, Reinventing production relations with the power of decentralization —Blockchain industry report, https://www.waitang.com/report/16386.html, 2018.
[19]

W. Wang, Accelerating the implementation of digital government strategy: Realistic dilemma and cracking path, (in Chinese), E-Government, no. 12, pp. 86–94, 2019.

[20]

R. Bi, Research on e-government based on blockchain, China Management Informationization, vol. 19, no. 23, pp. 148–151, 2016.

[21]
T. Ying, Research on government governance innovation based on blockchain, Master dissertation, College of Public Administration, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan, China, 2019.
[22]
J. Cardoso, J. Mendling, G. Neumann, and H. A. Reijers, A discourse on complexity of process models, in Proc. 2006 International Conference on Business Process Management Workshops, Vienna, Austria, 2006, pp. 117–128.
DOI
[23]
J. Cardoso, Control-flow complexity measurement of processes and Weyuker’s properties, in Proc. 6th International Conference on Enformatika, Budapest, Hungary, 2005, pp. 213–218.
[24]
Towards intelligent recommendation: A blockchain white paper, China Academy of Information and Communication Research and Trusted Blockchain Promotion Program, https://www.docin.com/p-2140049639.html, 2018.
[25]

J. Cardoso, Complexity analysis of BPEL web processes, Software Process Improvement & Practice, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 35–49, 2007.

[26]

W. Zhao and Y. Sun, Role-compatibility based measure method for process complexity, Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2348–2353, 2012.

[27]
F. Zhu and H. W. Zhang, “AHP+entropy weight method” based CW-TOPSIS model for predicting rockburst, Chinese Safety Science Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 128–133, 2017.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 15 April 2022
Revised: 23 June 2022
Accepted: 27 June 2022
Published: 30 November 2022
Issue date: December 2022

Copyright

© The author(s) 2022

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFF0900800).

Rights and permissions

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return