AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (882.4 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Differentiating Movement Disorders Using Smartwatch‐Derived Motor Variability and Non‐Motor Symptom Profiles

Paula Abola1( )George Jabishvili2
Department of Clinical Research, University of Jamestown, 4190 26th Ave. S., Fargo, ND 58104, United States of America
FIECON, EC1R 3AX, London, United Kingdom
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is characterized by motor and non‐motor symptoms that can overlap with other movement disorders, complicating accurate diagnosis and monitoring. Wearable technologies, such as smartwatches, offer continuous and objective assessment of motor function, but their clinical utility in multiclass classification and symptom prediction remains underexplored. This study aimed to determine whether smartwatch‐derived motor features can distinguish idiopathic PD from other movement disorders and whether motor variability is associated with non‐motor symptom burden in PD.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Parkinson’s Disease Smartwatch (PADS) dataset (N = 469), which includes accelerometer and gyroscope signals recorded during 20 standardized motor tasks. For each participant, mean and standard deviation values for each axis were averaged across tasks. Diagnostic group classification was assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Among individuals with idiopathic PD (n = 276), linear regression evaluated associations between motor variability and total non‐motor symptom scores from a 30‐item questionnaire.

Results

Motor variability features, particularly accelerometer Y‐axis and gyroscope X‐axis standard deviations, significantly differentiated diagnostic groups (pseudo R2 = 0.068). Age, sex, and handedness also contributed. In the PD subgroup, higher accelerometer X and gyroscope X variability were associated with greater non‐motor symptom burden, while greater stability in the mediolateral (Y) axis was linked to fewer symptoms (adjusted R2 = 0.0081, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Smartwatch‐derived motor variability features can modestly differentiate movement disorder diagnoses and are associated with non‐motor symptom severity in PD. Our findings support the complementary use of wearable sensors in clinical assessment and remote monitoring. Our findings also lay the foundation for future integration of wearable‐derived data into telemedicine workflows.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Brain Science Advances
Article number: 905003

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Abola P, Jabishvili G. Differentiating Movement Disorders Using Smartwatch‐Derived Motor Variability and Non‐Motor Symptom Profiles. Brain Science Advances, 2025, 11(3): 905003. https://doi.org/10.26599/BSA.2025.905003

484

Views

26

Downloads

2

Crossref

Received: 21 July 2025
Revised: 07 August 2025
Accepted: 09 September 2025
Published: 22 January 2026
© The authors 2025.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non‐commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).