Journal Home > Volume 3 , Issue 2

Recent cross-disciplinary work on quantifying historical dynamics has made major contributions to scholarship. However, efforts to specify relationships between scale and information-processing always run a risk of shoehorning messy realities into overly rigid categories. In the case of the first-millennium BCE “Axial Age” in the Old World, networks of collective computing were structured more by cultural systems than by polities, and to understand the relationships between political scale and collective computational abilities, scholars need categories flexible enough to clarify the complementarities between political and cultural systems.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Scale, Information-Processing, and Complementarities in Old-World Axial Age Societies

Show Author's information Ian Morris1( )
Department of Classics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2145, USA

Abstract

Recent cross-disciplinary work on quantifying historical dynamics has made major contributions to scholarship. However, efforts to specify relationships between scale and information-processing always run a risk of shoehorning messy realities into overly rigid categories. In the case of the first-millennium BCE “Axial Age” in the Old World, networks of collective computing were structured more by cultural systems than by polities, and to understand the relationships between political scale and collective computational abilities, scholars need categories flexible enough to clarify the complementarities between political and cultural systems.

Keywords: scale, information-processing, Axial Age, ancient Greece

References(41)

1

P. Turchin, T. E. Currie, H. Whitehouse, P. François, K. Feeney, D. Mulins, D. Hoyer, C. Collins, S. Grohmann, P. Savage, et al., Quantitative historical analysis uncovers a single dimension of complexity that structures global variation in human social organizations, Proc. Natl. Acod. Sci. USA, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. E144–E151, 2018.

2

J. Shin, M. H. Price, D. H. Wolpert, H. Shimao, B. Tracey, and T. A. Kohler, Scale and information-processing thresholds in Holocene social evolution, Nature Communications, vol. 11, p. 2394, 2020.

3
D. Hoyer and J. Reddish, Seshat History of the Axial Age. Chaplin, CT, USA: Beresta Books, 2019.
4
I. Morris, Growth: Social and political organizations, 1000 BC–AD 1350, in The Oxford Illustrated History of the World, F. Fernandez-Armesto, ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 203–237.
5

P. Turchin, D. Hoyer, J. Bennett, K. Basava, E. Cioni, K. Feeney, P. Francois, S. Holder, J. Levine, S. Nugent, et al., The Equinox2020 Seshat data release, Cliodynamics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2020.

6
K. Jaspers, The Origin and Goal of History. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press, 1953.
7
I. Morris, For what it’s worth: Evidence and models in the history of the Axial Age, in Seshat History of the Axial Age, D. Hoyer and J. Reddish, eds. Chaplin, CT, USA: Beresta Books, 2019, pp. 1–12.
8
B. Beheim, Q. D. Atkinson, J. A. Bulbulia, W. M. Gervais, R. D. Gray, J. Henrich, M. Lang, M. W. Monroe, M. Muthukrishna, A. Norenzayan, et al., Treatment of missing data determines conclusions regarding moralizing gods, https://psyarxiv.com/jwa2n/, 2022.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03655-4
DOI
9

H. Whitehouse, P. François, P. E. Savage, T. E. Currie, K. C. Feeney, E. Cioni, R. Purcell, R. M. Ross, J. Larson, J. Baines, et al., Complex societies precede moralizing gods throughout world ihistory, Nature, vol. 568, pp. 226–229, 2019.

10

A. Norenzayan, A. F. Shariff, W. M. Gervais, A. K. Willard, R. A. Mcnamara, E. Slingerland, and J. Henrich, The cultural evolution of prosocial religions, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 39, p. e1, 2016.

11
I. Morris, Why the West Rules—For Now: The Patterns of History, and What They Reveal about the Future. New York, NY, USA: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2010.
12
N. Baumard, A. Hyafil, I. Morris, and P. Boyer, Increased affluence explains the emergence of ascetic wisdoms and moralizing religions, Current Biology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2015.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.063
DOI
13
M. H. Hansen and T. H. Nielsen, An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2004.
14
J. Ober, The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2015.https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400865550
DOI
15
W. Harris, Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1989.https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038370
DOI
16

I. Morris, Economic growth in ancient Greece, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 709–742, 2004.

17
I. Morris and B. Powell, The Greeks: Economy, Culture, Society, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2021.
18
R. Netz, Scale, Space and Canon in Ancient Literary Culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686945
DOI
19
J. Ober, Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2008.https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828807
DOI
20

W. Scheidel, Real wages in early economies: Evidence for living standards from 1800 BCE to 1300 CE, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 425–462, 2010.

21
V. R. Shi, Writing and the origins of Greek intellectual influence, PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 2022.
22
M. Cowan, An Anthology of the Writings of Wilhelm von Humboldt. Detroit, MI, USA: Wayne State University Press, 1963.
23
M. Mann, The Sources of Social Power Volume I: A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
24
M. Weber, Economy and Society, 2 vols. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press, 1968.
25
I. Malkin, A Small Greek World: Networks in the Ancient Mediterranean. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199734818.001.0001
DOI
26
C. Dougherty and L. Kurke, The Cultures Within Ancient Greek Culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
27
J. M. Hall, Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605642
DOI
28
Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd Edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012.
29
I. Morris, The greater Athenian state, in the Dynamics of Ancient Empires, I. Morris and W. Scheidel, eds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 99–107.
30
C. Tilly, Coercion, Capital, and European States: AD 990–1990. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1992.
31
B. Obama, Remarks by the president at the cybersecurity and consumer protection summit, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/02/13/remarks-president-cybersecurity-and-consumer-protection-summit, 2015.
32
P. F. Bang, C. A. Bayly, and W. Scheidel, eds. The Oxford World History of Empire, 2 vols. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2021.https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197532768.001.0001
DOI
33
E. Frahm, A Companion to Assyria. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell, 2017.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325216
DOI
34
W. Scheidel, Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2010.
35
W. Scheidel, State Power in Ancient Rome and China. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2015.
36

I. Morris, Mediterraneanization, Mediterranean Historical Review, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 30–55, 2003.

37
I. Morris, The Measure of Civilization. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2014.
38
R. H. Bates, A. Greif, M. Levi, J. -L. Rosenthal, and B. R. Weingast, Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1999.https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691216232
DOI
39
P. Turchin, Historical Dynamics: Why States Rise and Fall. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2004.https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400889310
DOI
40
A. Robinson, Did Einstein really say that? https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05004-4, 2018.
41
Quote investigator, Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler, https://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/05/13/einstein-simple/, 2022.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 05 August 2021
Revised: 01 March 2022
Accepted: 03 March 2022
Published: 01 June 2022
Issue date: June 2022

Copyright

© The author(s) 2022

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank Darcy Bird, Tim Kohler, and David Wolpert for their patience and encouragement, as well as thanking them and anonymous reviewer for their insightful comments.

Rights and permissions

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return