AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home iEnergy Article
PDF (1.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Nodal frequency-constrained energy storage planning via hybrid data-model driven methods

Jiaxin Wang1Jiawei Zhang2( )Min Yang1Yating Wang2Ning Zhang1
Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
China Electric Power Planning and Engineering Institute, Beijing 100120, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Cross-regional high voltage direct current (HVDC) systems bring remarkable renewable power injections to the receiver side of power grids. However, HVDC failures result in large disturbances to receivers and cause critical frequency security problems. High renewable energy penetration also reduces the system inertia and damping coefficients. Thus, some nodal frequency nadirs may be much lower than those calculated by the center-of-inertia (COI) and may trigger low-frequency protection. Energy storage is a promising solution for frequency-related problems. In this study, we build an energy storage planning model considering both COI and nodal frequency security constraints. The energy storage capacities and locations are determined in the planning scheme based on year-round operations. First, we carry out a year-round COI-frequency-constrained unit commitment to obtain comprehensive operation modes. Next, we propose a hybrid data-model driven approach to generate nodal frequency security constraints for extensive operation modes effectively. Finally, we achieve optimal energy storage planning with both COI and nodal frequency constraints. Case studies on a modified RTS-79 test system and a 1089-bus power system in practical in Jiangsu, China, verify the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

References

[1]

Kalair, A., Abas, N., Khan, N. (2016). Comparative study of HVAC and HVDC transmission systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59: 1653–1675.

[2]
Welcome to State Grid Corporation of China. (2024). Available at http://www.sgcc.com.cn/
[3]
Global Times (2021). China’s state grid: Linking north and south of Brazil. Available at https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202108/1232633.shtml
[4]

Niu, D., Fang, J., Yau, W., Goetz, S. M. (2023). Comprehensive evaluation of energy storage systems for inertia emulation and frequency regulation improvement. Energy Reports, 9: 2566–2576.

[5]

Liang, J., Fan, H., Cheng, L., Rong, S., Li, T., Yu, T., Wang, L. (2024). Control strategy for improving the frequency response characteristics of photovoltaic and energy storage systems based on VSG control. Energy Reports, 11: 2295–2305.

[6]

Zhang, J., Zhang, N., Ge, Y. (2023). Energy storage placements for renewable energy fluctuations: A practical study. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 38: 4916–4927.

[7]

Liu, Y., He, Q., Shi, X., Zhang, Q., An, X. (2023). Energy storage in China: Development progress and business model. Journal of Energy Storage, 72: 108240.

[8]

Teng, F., Trovato, V., Strbac, G. (2016). Stochastic scheduling with inertia-dependent fast frequency response requirements. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31: 1557–1566.

[9]

Badesa, L., Teng, F., Strbac, G. (2020). Pricing inertia and frequency response with diverse dynamics in a mixed-integer second-order cone programming formulation. Applied Energy, 260: 114334.

[10]

Zhang, Z., Du, E., Teng, F., Zhang, N., Kang, C. (2020). Modeling frequency dynamics in unit commitment with a high share of renewable energy. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 35: 4383–4395.

[11]

Li, K., Guo, H., Fang, X., Liu, S., Teng, F., Chen, Q. (2023). Market mechanism design of inertia and primary frequency response with consideration of energy market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 38: 5701–5713.

[12]

Shen, Y., Wu, W., Wang, B., Yang, Y., Lin, Y. (2023). Data-driven convexification for frequency nadir constraint of unit commitment. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 11: 1711–1717.

[13]

Lagos, D. T., Hatziargyriou, N. D. (2021). Data-driven frequency dynamic unit commitment for island systems with high RES penetration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 4699–4711.

[14]

Zhang, J., Jia, H., Zhang, N. (2023). Alternate support vector machine decision trees for power systems rule extractions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 38: 980–983.

[15]

Zhang, Y., Cui, H., Liu, J., Qiu, F., Hong, T., Yao, R., Li, F. (2022). Encoding frequency constraints in preventive unit commitment using deep learning with region-of-interest active sampling. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37: 1942–1955.

[16]

Zhang, Y., Chen, C., Liu, G., Hong, T., Qiu, F. (2021). Approximating trajectory constraints with machine learning–microgrid islanding with frequency constraints. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 1239–1249.

[17]
Ørum, E., Kuivaniemi, M., Laasonen, M., Bruseth, A. I., Jansson, E. A., Danell, A., Elkington, K., Modig, N. (2015). Future system inertia. Nordic Report. ENTSOE. Available at https://eepublicdownloads.entsoe.eu/clean-documents/Publications/SOC/Nordic/Nordic_report_Future_System_Inertia.pdf
[18]

Badesa, L., Teng, F., Strbac, G. (2021). Conditions for regional frequency stability in power system scheduling: Part I: Theory. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 5558–5566.

[19]

Poolla, B. K., Bolognani, S., Dörfler, F. (2017). Optimal placement of virtual inertia in power grids. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62: 6209–6220.

[20]

Milano, F., Ortega, Á. (2017). Frequency divider. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32: 1493–1501.

[21]

Zhao, J., Mili, L., Milano, F. (2018). Robust frequency divider for power system online monitoring and control. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 4414–4423.

[22]

Hou, Q., Du, E., Zhang, N., Kang, C. (2020). Impact of high renewable penetration on the power system operation mode: A data-driven approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 35: 731–741.

[23]

Du, E., Zhang, N., Kang, C., Xia, Q. (2019). A high-efficiency network-constrained clustered unit commitment model for power system planning studies. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 2498–2508.

[24]

Zhang, N., Jiang, H., Du, E., Zhuo, Z., Wang, P., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y. (2022). An efficient power system planning model considering year-round hourly operation simulation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37: 4925–4935.

[25]

Meus, J., Poncelet, K., Delarue, E. (2018). Applicability of a clustered unit commitment model in power system modeling. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 2195–2204.

[26]

Tejada-Arango, D. A., Domeshek, M., Wogrin, S., Centeno, E. (2018). Enhanced representative days and system states modeling for energy storage investment analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 6534–6544.

[27]

Wang, J., Zhang, J., Hou, Q., Jiang, H., Strbac, G., Teng, F., Zhang, N. (2025). Analytical decomposition of nodal frequency responses. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 40: 1176–1179.

[28]
China Electric Power Research Institute (2015). PSD-BPA Transient Stability Program User Manual 5th Ed.
[29]

Li, Y., Gu, Y., He, G., Chen, Q. (2023). Optimal dispatch of battery energy storage in distribution network considering electrothermal-aging coupling. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 14: 3744–3758.

[30]
China Power Engineering Consulting Group Co., Ltd. (2019). Power Engineering Design Manual: Power System Planning and Design. China: China Electric Power Press.
[31]

Zimmerman, R. D., Murillo-Sánchez, C. E., Thomas, R. J. (2011). MATPOWER: Steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26: 12–19.

iEnergy
Pages 43-53
Cite this article:
Wang J, Zhang J, Yang M, et al. Nodal frequency-constrained energy storage planning via hybrid data-model driven methods. iEnergy, 2025, 4(1): 43-53. https://doi.org/10.23919/IEN.2025.0005

60

Views

3

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 20 December 2024
Revised: 10 February 2025
Accepted: 24 February 2025
Published: 24 March 2025
© The author(s) 2025.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return