AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Hydrodynamic Stability of Ships in Waves | Publishing Language: Chinese

Comparative analysis of surf-riding characteristics between waterjet and propeller-propelled ships

Peiyuan FENG1( )Wei ZHAO2Youlin CAI3
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ship Engineering, Shanghai 200011, China
Marine Design and Research Institute of China, Shanghai 200011, China
Science and Technology Laboratory of Waterjet Propulsion, Shanghai 201100, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

Surf-riding, often followed by broaching, is one of the five stability failure modes defined in the IMO's Second Generation Intact Stability (SGIS) framework and poses a significant safety risk to high-speed craft. This study quantifies the influence of the propulsor type—waterjet versus conventional propeller—on the onset probability and underlying mechanisms of surf-riding, providing guidance for the rational selection of propulsion systems during the early design phase.

Methods

A single-degree-of-freedom surge equation was coupled with the IMO Level-2 vulnerability assessment. Thrust models for the two types of propulsors were derived from open-water propeller tests and pump head–flow bench data, respectively. Time-domain simulations were conducted in both regular and irregular stern-quartering waves for a 110 m wave-piercing catamaran with a service speed of 24 knots. Identical hull resistance and wave-excitation force formulations were applied to ensure that observed differences could be solely attributable to propulsor mechanics.

Results

At the design speed (Fr≈0.36), the waterjet-propelled variant exceeded the SGIS threshold, whereas the propeller-driven sister ship remained below it. In regular waves (λ/L = 2.1, H/λ= 0.09), the waterjet craft entered sustained surf-riding after approximately 30 s, while the propeller craft exhibited bounded periodic motion. The dominant mechanism is the waterjet's weak thrust–speed gradient: a 20 % speed increase reduces thrust by only 6%, compared with 23% for the propeller, allowing the hull to lock onto the celerity of the overtaking wave.

Conclusions

The intrinsic thrust–velocity characteristic of waterjets reduces surf-riding margins. Designers should either impose operational speed limits or implement active thrust modulation when waterjets are used for high-speed hulls. The methodology, fully consistent with MSC.1/Circ.1627, offers a quantitative tool for evaluating propulsion trade-offs and ensuring regulatory compliance.

CLC number: U661.2+2; U661.32 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Chinese Journal of Ship Research
Pages 37-42

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
FENG P, ZHAO W, CAI Y. Comparative analysis of surf-riding characteristics between waterjet and propeller-propelled ships. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2026, 21(1): 37-42. https://doi.org/10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.04591

378

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 02 July 2025
Revised: 18 August 2025
Published: 01 September 2025
© 2026 Chinese Journal of Ship Research.