AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (936.7 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Research | Open Access

Impact of different treatment approaches on long-term refractive and visual outcomes in retinopathy of prematurity

Osman Kizilay1Ahmad Kunbaz2( )Ozge Pinar Akarsu Acar3Murat Gunay4Gokhan Celik1
Eye Clinic, Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Children’s Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34668, Türkiye
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul 34722, Türkiye
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag 59030, Türkiye
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon 61080, Türkiye
Show Author Information

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the long-term refractive and visual outcomes in infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), laser photocoagulation (LPC), or combined IVB+LPC therapy, and to assess disease severity on refractive development over five years.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from infants diagnosed with ROP between 2013 and 2018. Patients were categorized into four groups: IVB (n=44), LPC (n=41), IVB+LPC (n=17), and regressed ROP (RROP, n=50). A subgroup analysis was performed for Type 1 ROP and aggressive ROP (AROP). Primary outcomes included spherical equivalent (SE), astigmatism, and visual acuity (logMAR), measured at 6-month intervals up to 60mo.

RESULTS

The study included 152 patients (76 females). The mean birth weight was 1256.1±555.6 g, and the mean week of birth was 29.1±2.9wk. RROP infants had the highest SE, closest to emmetropia. The IVB+LPC group showed the most significant myopic shift compared to other groups (P<0.05). In Type 1 ROP, SE was lower in the IVB+LPC group initially, but by 60mo, the difference was not significant. Astigmatism was higher in the LPC group at later time points (36–60mo). However, no differences in visual acuity were observed at the final follow-up among treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Refractive outcomes vary more in Type 1 ROP than AROP. IVB+LPC results in greater myopia; LPC is associated with increased astigmatism. Individualized refractive follow-up is essential, particularly for Type 1 ROP.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Pages 1107-1116

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Kizilay O, Kunbaz A, Akarsu Acar OP, et al. Impact of different treatment approaches on long-term refractive and visual outcomes in retinopathy of prematurity. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2026, 19(6): 1107-1116. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2026.06.11

192

Views

15

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 03 May 2025
Accepted: 06 February 2026
Published: 18 June 2026
© 2026 International Journal of Ophthalmology Press

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).