AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (711.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Research | Open Access

Comparison of binocular vision indices in Parkinson’s disease patients vs age-sex-matched healthy controls

Reyhaneh Shariati-Moghaddam1Ali Shoeibi2Morad Amir Ahmad3Hadi Ostadimoghaddam4Hassan Hashemi5Akbar Derakhshan6Zahra Hemmatian1Abbasali Yekta1( )Mehdi Khabazkhoob7
Department of Optometry, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 1394491388, Iran
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 9919991766, Iran
Department of Optometry & Physiotherapy, Erbil Technical & Medical Health Collage, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region 44001, Iraq
Refractive Errors Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 1394491388, Iran
Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran 1983963113, Iran
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Eye Research Center, Khatam Al Anbiya Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 9195965919, Iran
Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1983969411, Iran
Show Author Information

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the differences in near point of convergence (NPC), fusional vergence, saccadic eye movements, versional eye movements, and heterophoria between patients diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and healthy subjects.

METHODS

A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted, enrolling two cohorts: a PD group and a healthy control group. The PD group was recruited via non-random convenience sampling, while the control group was selected randomly from individuals without PD. All participants were screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria before undergoing a comprehensive optometric assessment, which included measurements of uncorrected visual acuity, corrected visual acuity, and objective and subjective refraction. Subsequently, binocular vision function evaluations were performed, covering NPC measurement, fusional vergence reserve assessment at both distance and near, saccadic eye movement testing, and versional eye movement and heterophoria assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 42 PD patients and 41 healthy controls were included in the final analysis. The two groups were well-matched in terms of sex distribution [29 males (69.0%) in the PD group vs 29 males (70.7%) in the control group, P=0.867] and mean age (55.3±9.6y in the PD group vs 54.9±9.8y in the control group, P=0.866). The prevalence of abnormal versional eye movements was significantly higher in the PD group than in the control group (23.81%, 95%CI: 12.05%-39.45% vs 7.32%, 95%CI: 1.54%-19.92%; P=0.025). Near exophoria was more prevalent in PD patients (61.90%, 95%CI: 45.64%-76.43%) than in controls (17.07%, 95%CI: 7.15%-32.06%), with a significant difference [odds ratio (OR)=7.99; 95%CI: 2.83-21.99; P<0.001]. The mean NPC was significantly greater (more receded) in the PD group than in the control group (9.01±3.74 cm vs 7.20±2.15 cm; P=0.007). A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between PD severity and NPC values (Pearson’s correlation coefficient=0.309; P=0.046). Except for distance base-out break and distance base-out recovery values, all other fusional vergence parameters were significantly lower in the PD group than in the control group (P<0.05). The mean saccadic test score was significantly lower in PD patients than in controls (3.29±0.57 vs 3.78±0.42; P<0.001). Among all fusional vergence indices, near base-in blur yielded the highest area under the curve (AUC=0.877), with a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 90%, followed by distance base-out blur (AUC=0.824, sensitivity=97.6%, specificity=66.7%), near base-out blur (AUC=0.814, sensitivity=76.2%, specificity=72.7%), near base-out break (AUC=0.749, sensitivity=78.6%, specificity=67.6%), and near base-out recovery (AUC=0.749, sensitivity=95.2%, specificity=50%).

CONCLUSION

PD is associated with significant binocular vision function impairment, with receded NPC and reduced near fusional vergence reserves being the most prominent disorders. These findings highlight the potential value of binocular vision assessment as a non-invasive biomarker for the early detection and clinical monitoring of PD.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Pages 549-555

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Shariati-Moghaddam R, Shoeibi A, Ahmad MA, et al. Comparison of binocular vision indices in Parkinson’s disease patients vs age-sex-matched healthy controls. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2026, 19(3): 549-555. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2026.03.16

364

Views

19

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 04 November 2025
Accepted: 18 November 2025
Published: 18 March 2026
© 2026 International Journal of Ophthalmology Press

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).