AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (657.6 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Research | Open Access

Outcomes of lacrimal sac hydrostatic pressure application in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Ilanit Trifonov1Tal Koval1,2( )Ran Moshkovsky1,2Oriel Spierer1,2,3
School of Medicine, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
Department of Ophthalmology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon 5822012, Israel
Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv 6812509, Israel

Co-first Authors: Ilanit Trifonov and Tal Koval

Show Author Information

Abstract

AIM

To assess the success rate of lacrimal sac hydrostatic pressure application (HPA) maneuver, a conservative office procedure for treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).

METHODS

The medical records of pediatric patients, 36mo old or younger, diagnosed with CNLDO between the years 2016-2022, were retrospectively reviewed. In all children, HPA was performed by a pediatric ophthalmologist. Success was defined as the resolution of epiphora and discharge within 48h of the intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 281 eyes (194 patients) with CNLDO underwent HPA. Follow-up data were available for 261 eyes (179 patients, 50.3% male) and these patients were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up time was 11.6±13mo. Ninety-seven patients (54.2%) had unilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction, while 82 patients (45.8%) had bilateral CNLDO. The mean age at the time of HPA was 5.8±5.9mo. Complete resolution of symptoms was achieved in 102 (39.1%) eyes. Patients 6mo old or younger at the time of HPA had a significantly higher success rate compared to patients older than 6mo (43.7% vs 30.9%, P=0.04). Younger age at the time of pressure application was associated with a higher resolution rate of CNLDO (OR 0.93, P=0.004). Sex assigned at birth, prematurity, laterality of the obstruction and type of symptoms (epiphora, discharge) were not correlated with success. A second HPA was performed in 46 eyes, with resolution of symptoms in 12 eyes (26.1%).

CONCLUSION

Hydrostatic pressure applied on the lacrimal sac by an experienced ophthalmologist or an experienced pediatrician may be an effective treatment for CNLDO. We recommend HPA as an initial active conservative approach in all pediatric patients with CNLDO, especially those younger than 6mo.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Pages 462-467

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Trifonov I, Koval T, Moshkovsky R, et al. Outcomes of lacrimal sac hydrostatic pressure application in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2026, 19(3): 462-467. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2026.03.05

449

Views

18

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 16 March 2025
Accepted: 10 October 2025
Published: 18 March 2026
© 2026 International Journal of Ophthalmology Press

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).