AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (5.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Study | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

A prospective cohort study of immediate implantation and delayed implantation for a labial bony dehiscence defect in the maxillary aesthetic area

Zhenya SUShiqi LIAnchun MO( )
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Implantation, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effect of immediate and delayed implant placement on dimensional changes in hard and soft tissues as well as esthetic outcomes.

Methods

A total of 40 maxillary single anterior teeth with a dehiscence defect on the labial bone (≤4 mm) were categorized into two groups according to the timing of implant placement: immediate implant placement (n = 20) or delayed implant placement (n = 20). Guided bone regeneration (GBR) was conducted at the sites using a flap approach, and the implants were given immediate provisionalization. Implant survival rates, dimensional changes in hard and soft tissues during the six- and twelve-month follow-ups, and pink esthetic scores (PESs) were measured.

Results

The implant survival rates in both groups were 100%, and no complications occurred during the follow-up time. There was no significant difference between the two groups at the measurement sites in the dimensional change of hard and soft tissues during the six- and twelve-month follow-ups. The largest resorption was observed at the implant neck, with a loss of (1.29 ± 0.71) mm in the immediate implant placement group and (1.43 ± 0.19) mm in the delayed implant placement group. The mean PES scores were (10.95 ± 1.51) for the immediate implant placement group and (11.05 ± 1.23) for the delayed implant placement group.

Conclusion

Immediate implantation or delayed implantation combined with GBR and immediate provisionalization might both be a prospective treatment strategy for a maxillary single anterior tooth with a dehiscence defect on the labial bone.

CLC number: R78 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2022)07-0483-08

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 483-490

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
SU Z, LI S, MO A. A prospective cohort study of immediate implantation and delayed implantation for a labial bony dehiscence defect in the maxillary aesthetic area. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2022, 30(7): 483-490. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.07.004

83

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

4

Scopus

Received: 08 November 2021
Revised: 16 January 2022
Published: 20 July 2022
© 2022 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases