AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Study | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Endoscope-assisted subgingival scaling and root planing in the treatment of periodontitis: systematic evaluation of effects

Ruonan XU1,2Yiru WEI1,2Ke LIU1Awuti GULINUER1,2( )
Department of Periodontal and Mucosal, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (the Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University), Urumqi 830054, China
Stomatology Disease Institute of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830054, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effect of endoscopic-assisted subgingival scaling and root planning (SRP) in the treatment of periodontitis.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to endoscopy-assisted SRP. The search time limit was from the establishment of the database to September 15, 2021. The outcome indicators included in the study included the plaque index (PLI), probing depth (PD), attachment loss (AL), and bleeding index (BI). Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 12.0 software were used for the meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 111 studies were retrieved, and 5 quantitative studies were included after screening. Meta-analysis showed that for sites with 4 mm ≤ PD < 6 mm, 3 and 6 months after treatment, there was no significant difference in the PD value between the endoscope assisted group and the simple SRP group (P > 0.05); for sites with PD ≥ 6 mm, the PD value of the endoscope assisted group was smaller than that of the simple SRP group 3 and 6 months after treatment. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in PLI, Al or BI between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with simple SRP, the auxiliary use of endoscopy has a better effect on reducing PD in deep periodontal pockets (PD ≥ 6 mm). However, for clinical indicators such as PLI, AL, and BI, there was no difference between the therapeutic effects of the two methods.

CLC number: R78 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2022)05-0338-07

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 338-344

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
XU R, WEI Y, LIU K, et al. Endoscope-assisted subgingival scaling and root planing in the treatment of periodontitis: systematic evaluation of effects. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2022, 30(5): 338-344. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.05.005

83

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Scopus

Received: 14 October 2021
Revised: 01 December 2021
Published: 20 May 2022
© 2022 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases