AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the distance between the root apex of mandibular molars and the inferior alveolar nerve canal in adults

Juan ZHANGYaxin WANGChao SUNGuangchao ZHOULianfeng YANG( )Daming WU( )
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University; Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the spatiotemporal relationship between the root apex of mandibular molars and the inferior alveolar nerve canal (IANC) in adults.

Methods

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were collected in 236 patients, and the distances from the root apexes of mandibular molars to the IANC were measured in NNT 4.6 software. The relationship between distance and gender was evaluated.

Results

In two-rooted mandibular first molars, the distances from the mesial root and distal root to the IANC were 7.34 ± 2.07 mm and 6.69 ± 2.08 mm, respectively, in males and 6.47 ± 2.22 mm and 5.94 ± 2.11 mm in females. In three-rooted mandibular first molars, the distances from the mesial root, distobuccal root, and distolingual to the IANC were 7.29 ± 1.30 mm, 7.40 ± 2.33 mm, and 9.97 ± 2.19 mm, respectively, in males and 6.08 ± 2.57 mm, 6.35 ± 2.40 mm, and 9.01 ± 2.90 mm, respectively, in females. In one-rooted mandibular second molars, the distance from the root to the IANC was 4.09 ± 1.64 mm in males and 3.89 ± 1.76 mm in females. In two-rooted mandibular second molars, the distances from the mesial root and distal root to the IANC were 5.14 ± 2.08 mm and 4.39 ± 1.85 mm, respectively, in males and 3.78 ± 1.69 mm and 3.24 ± 1.72 mm, respectively, in females. There were no significant with in-gender differences between the left and right side in the distances from the root apexes to the IANC (P>0.05). The distances from the mandibular first molar were greater in males than in females. The longest average distance was from the distolingual root apexes of three-rooted mandibular first molars to the IANC, and the distances were longer from the distobuccal root apexes of three-rooted mandibular first molars to the IANC than from the distal root apexes of two-rooted mandibular first molars to the IANC (P<0.05). There was no within-gender difference in the distances from the root apexes of single-rooted mandibular second molars to the IANC (P>0.05), but the distances in two-rooted mandibular second molars were larger in males than in females (P<0.05). The distances from the root apexes to the IANC were smaller in mandibular second molars than in mandibular first molars (P<0.05).

Conclusion

There are significant differences between adult males and females in the distance from the root apex to the IANC for mandibular first molars and two-rooted mandibular second molars. The distances from the root apexes to the IANC were smaller in mandibular second molars than in mandibular first molars.

CLC number: R781.05 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2018)03-0175-05

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 175-179

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHANG J, WANG Y, SUN C, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the distance between the root apex of mandibular molars and the inferior alveolar nerve canal in adults. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2018, 26(3): 175-179. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2018.03.007

100

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 22 August 2017
Revised: 26 September 2017
Published: 20 March 2018
© 2018 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases