AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Special Article | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Effect of oxidative stress on the activity of human osteoblastic MG63 cells

Jun FU1Linxi FAN2Ning JIANG2Haiying LIN2Qiong WANG2( )
Beijing stomatological hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
Southwest Medical University, Preclinical Medicine Research Center / School of Pharmacy, Luzhou 646000, China
Southwest Medical University, Department of Physiology, Luzhou 646000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the morphology and proliferation viability in oxidative stress induced damage in human MG63 cells.

Methods

The MG63 cells were treated with superoxide anion (O2.-) produced by different con-centrations of xanthine/xanthine oxidase enzymatic reactions to establish the model of oxidative stress in MG63 cells, using the xanthine oxidase inhibitor oxypurinol to observe the reverse effect of oxypurinol on xanthine/xanthine oxidase induced damage in human MG63 cells. Using the flow cytometry, the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by xanthine/xanthine oxidase induced cellular oxidative stress damage was evaluated by the oxidation-sensitive fluorescent probe, the 2'7'-dichlorofluorescin diacetate. Cellular viability and morphology was evaluated by the MTT assay and the phase contrast microscope.

Results

Xanthine/xanthine oxidase induced intracellular ROS production in a dose- and time- dependent manner (P < 0.05). The cellular viability was reduced and cellular morphology was damaged, too (P < 0.05). Xanthine/xanthine oxidase induced the damage of the cellular morphology. At the same processing time, the higher the xanthine/xanthine oxidase concentration, the higher intracellular ROS fluorescence intensity value, and the lower OD value, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The intracellular mean ROS fluorescence intensity in xanthine/xanthine oxidase + oxypurinol combined treatment group was significantly lower compared with the same concentration of xanthine/xanthine oxidase (P < 0.05). At the same concentration of xanthine/xanthine oxidase, with the extension of treatment time, the intracellular mean ROS fluorescence intensity gradually increased, the OD value decreased, compared with the control group, the intracellular mean ROS fluorescence intensity of 120 min increased to 345% of the control, was the highest among the xanthine/xanthine oxidase groups. The OD value of 24 h was the 22.9% of the control group, was the lowest among the xanthine/xanthine oxidase groups, cell proliferation activity decreased more obvious.

Conclusions

Xanthine/xanthine oxidase could induce oxidative stress damaged the cellular morphology and reduced the cellular viability in MG63 cell lines. The oxypurinol (the inhibitor of xanthine oxidas) could reverse the oxidative stress injury induced by xanthine/xanthine oxidase in human osteoblastic cells.

CLC number: R783 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2017)06-0347-07

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 347-353

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
FU J, FAN L, JIANG N, et al. Effect of oxidative stress on the activity of human osteoblastic MG63 cells. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2017, 25(6): 347-353. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2017.06.002

88

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 15 December 2016
Revised: 03 January 2017
Published: 20 June 2017
© 2017 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases