AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Clinical comparison of space closure with sliding mechanism between self ligating bracket and twin brackets

Yi-long AIZeng-quan WANGPeng ZHANG( )Si-yuan WU
Foshan Stomatological Hosptial, Foshan 528000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To compare the the rate of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics between 3M SmartClip self-ligating brackets and 3M Gemini MBT twin brackets in the first premolar extraction patients.

Methods

20 Class I malocclusion patients who need first premolar extraction treatment were selected. One arch side of the second premolar and first molar were bonded with 3M self-ligating brackets and the other side bonded with Gemini MBT twin brackets. After leveling and alignment, 0.48 mm × 0.64 mm (0.019 inch × 0.025 inch) stainless steel wire and nickel titanium coil springs were used to close the space. An average rate of space closure per month (mm/month) was calculated in each side.

Results

The median rates of tooth movement for the SmartClip bracket side (1.03 mm per month) and the Gemini MBT twin brackets side (1.00 mm per month) were not significantly different (t = 0.70, P = 0.48).

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the rate of en-masse space closure between SmartClip brackets and Gemini MBT twin brackets.

CLC number: R783.5 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2016)06-349-03

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 349-351

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
AI Y-l, WANG Z-q, ZHANG P, et al. Clinical comparison of space closure with sliding mechanism between self ligating bracket and twin brackets. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2016, 24(6): 349-351. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.06.007

320

Views

7

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 26 February 2016
Revised: 28 March 2016
Published: 20 June 2016
© 2016 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases