Journal Home > Volume 18 , Issue 1

menu
Full text
Outline
About this article

How to do when PFO closure failed under routine guidance: the first clinical experience for PFO closure

Show Author's information Ying ZHOU1Jun-Gang NIE2( )
Department of Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No.17 Yongwaizhengjie, Donghu District, Nanchang, China

References(5)

[1]

Calvert PA, Rana BS, Kydd AC, et al. Patent foramen ovale: anatomy, outcomes, and closure. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011; 8: 148−160.

[2]

Mojadidi MK, Zaman MO, Elgendy IY, et al. Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71: 1035−1043.

[3]

Capodanno D, Milazzo G, Vitale L, et al. Updating the evidence on patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis of 2,303 patients from three randomised trials and 2,231 patients from 11 observational studies. Euro Intervention 2014; 9: 1342−1349.

[4]

Alkhouli M, Sievert H, Holmes DR. Patent foramen ovale closure for secondary stroke prevention. Eur Heart J 2019; 40: 2339−2350.

[5]

Rana BS, Thomas MR, Calvert PA, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of patent foramen ovale prior to device closure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 749−760.

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Published: 28 January 2021
Issue date: January 2021

Copyright

© 2021 JGC All rights reserved

Acknowledgements

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81903724). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Return