Spatial distribution of the potential forest biomass availability in Europe

Pieter Johannes Verkerk; Joanne Brighid Fitzgerald; Pawan Datta; Matthias Dees; Geerten Martijn Hengeveld; Marcus Lindner; Sergey Zudin

doi:10.1186/s40663-019-0163-5

Forest Ecosystems 2019, 6(1): 5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0163-5

Research |

Open Access | Issue | Published: 07 February 2019

Spatial distribution of the potential forest biomass availability in Europe

Show Author's Information Hide Author's Information Pieter Johannes Verkerk^¹

(

), Joanne Brighid Fitzgerald^¹, Pawan Datta^², Matthias Dees^², Geerten Martijn Hengeveld^³, Marcus Lindner^⁴, Sergey Zudin^¹

European Forest Institute, Yliopistokatu 6B, Joensuu, Finland

University of Freiburg – Institute of Forest Sciences – Chair of Remote Sensing and Landscape Information Systems, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79085 Freiburg, Germany

Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708, PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands

European Forest Institute, Platz der Vereinten Nationen 7, 53113 Bonn, Germany

Keywords:

Spatial distribution, Europe, Forest biomass, EFISCEN, Potential supply

Cite this article:

Verkerk PJ, Fitzgerald JB, Datta P, et al. Spatial distribution of the potential forest biomass availability in Europe. Forest Ecosystems, 2019, 6(1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0163-5

Download citation

EndNote(RIS)

BibTeX

437

Views

Downloads

Citations

Crossref

N/A

WoS

Scopus

CSCD

Abstract Full text About this article

Abstract

Background

European forests are considered a crucial resource for supplying biomass to a growing bio-economy in Europe. This study aimed to assess the potential availability of forest biomass from European forests and its spatial distribution. We tried to answer the questions (ⅰ) how is the potential forest biomass availability spatially distributed across Europe and (ⅱ) where are hotspots of potential forest biomass availability located?

Methods

The spatial distribution of woody biomass potentials was assessed for 2020 for stemwood,residues (branches and harvest losses) and stumps for 39 European countries. Using the European Forest Information SCENario (EFISCEN) model and international forest statistics,we estimated the theoretical amount of biomass that could be available based on the current and future development of the forest age-structure,growing stock and increment and forest management regimes. We combined these estimates with a set of environmental (site productivity,soil and water protection and biodiversity protection) and technical (recovery rate,soil bearing capacity) constraints,which reduced the amount of woody biomass that could potentially be available. We mapped the potential biomass availability at the level of administrative units and at the 10 km × 10 km grid level to gain insight into the spatial distribution of the woody biomass potentials.

Results

According to our results,the total availability of forest biomass ranges between 357 and 551 Tg dry matter per year. The largest potential supply of woody biomass per unit of land can be found in northern Europe (southern Finland and Sweden,Estonia and Latvia),central Europe (Austria,Czech Republic,and southern Germany),Slovenia,southwest France and Portugal. However,large parts of these potentials are already used to produce materials and energy. The distribution of biomass potentials that are currently unused only partially coincides with regions that currently have high levels of wood production.

Conclusions

Our study shows how the forest biomass potentials are spatially distributed across the European continent,thereby providing insight into where policies could focus on an increase of the supply of woody biomass from forests. Future research on potential biomass availability from European forests should also consider to what extent forest owners would be willing to mobilise additional biomass from their forests and at what costs the estimated potentials could be mobilised.

Full text

Abstract

Full text

Outline

About this article

Spatial distribution of the potential forest biomass availability in Europe

Show Author's information Hide Author's Information Pieter Johannes Verkerk^¹

(

), Joanne Brighid Fitzgerald^¹, Pawan Datta^², Matthias Dees^², Geerten Martijn Hengeveld^³, Marcus Lindner^⁴, Sergey Zudin^¹

European Forest Institute, Yliopistokatu 6B, Joensuu, Finland

University of Freiburg – Institute of Forest Sciences – Chair of Remote Sensing and Landscape Information Systems, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79085 Freiburg, Germany

Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708, PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands

European Forest Institute, Platz der Vereinten Nationen 7, 53113 Bonn, Germany

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords: Spatial distribution, Europe, Forest biomass, EFISCEN, Potential supply

References(71)

Achat DL, Deleuze C, Landmann G, Pousse N, Ranger J, Augusto L (2015a) Quantifying consequences of removing harvesting residues on forest soils and tree growth - a meta-analysis. For Ecol Manag 348:124-141 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.042. Accessed 01 May 2018

DOI

Achat DL, Fortin M, Landmann G, Ringeval B, Augusto L (2015b) Forest soil carbon is threatened by intensive biomass harvesting. Sci Rep 5:15991. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15991

DOI Google Scholar

Alberdi I, Michalak R, Fischer C, Gasparini P, Brändli U-B, Tomter SM, Kuliesis A, Snorrason A, Redmond J, Hernández L, Lanz A, Vidondo B, Stoyanov N, Stoyanova M, Vestman M, Barreiro S, Marin G, Cañellas I, Vidal C (2016) Towards harmonized assessment of European forest availability for wood supply in Europe. For Policy Econ 70:20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.014

DOI Google Scholar

Antón-Fernández C, Astrup R (2012) Empirical harvest models and their use in regional business-as-usual scenarios of timber supply and carbon stock development. Scand J Forest Res 27:379-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2011.644576

DOI Google Scholar

Asikainen A, Liiri H, Peltola S, Karjalainen T, Laitila J (2008) Forest Energy Potential in Europe (EU27). Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki, p 33

Bell J, Paula L, Dodd T, Németh S, Nanou C, Mega V, Campos P (2018) EU ambition to build the world's leading bioeconomy—uncertain times demand innovative and sustainable solutions. New. Biotech 40:25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.010

DOI Google Scholar

Blennow K, Persson E, Lindner M, Faias SP, Hanewinkel M (2014) Forest owner motivations and attitudes towards supplying biomass for energy in Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 67:223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.05.002

DOI Google Scholar

Bouget C, Lassauce A, Jonsell M (2012) Effects of fuelwood harvesting on biodiversity - a review focused on the situation in Europe. Can J For Res 42:1421-1432. https://doi.org/10.1139/x2012-078

DOI Google Scholar

Brukas V, Felton A, Lindbladh M, Sallnäs O (2013) Linking forest management, policy and biodiversity indicators - a comparison of Lithuania and southern Sweden. Forest Ecol Manag 291:181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.034

DOI Google Scholar

Brunet-Navarro P, Jochheim H, Muys B (2017) The effect of increasing lifespan and recycling rate on carbon storage in wood products from theoretical model to application for the European wood sector. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 22:1193-1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9722-z

DOI Google Scholar

Brus DJ, Hengeveld GM, Walvoort DJJ, Goedhart PW, Heidema AH, Nabuurs GJ, Gunia K (2012) Statistical mapping of tree species over Europe. Eur J Forest Res 131:145-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0513-5

DOI Google Scholar

Burg V, Bowman G, Erni M, Lemm R, Thees O (2018) Analyzing the potential of domestic biomass resources for the energy transition in Switzerland. Biomass Bioenergy 111:60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.02.007

DOI Google Scholar

Daioglou V, Stehfest E, Wicke B, Faaij A, van Vuuren DP (2016) Projections of the availability and cost of residues from agriculture and forestry. GCB Bioenerg 8:456-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12285

DOI Google Scholar

de Wit M, Faaij A (2010) European biomass resource potential and costs. Biomass Bioenergy 34:188-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.07.011

DOI Google Scholar

Dees M, Elbersen B, Fitzgerald J, Vis M, Anttila P, Forsell N, Ramirez-Almeyda J, García Galindo D, Glavonjic B, Staritsky I, Verkerk H, Prinz R, Monti A, Leduc S, Höhl M, Datta P, Schrijver R, Zudin S, Lindner M, Lesschen J, Diepen K (2017a) A spatial data base on sustainable biomass cost-supply of lignocellulosic biomass in Europe - methods & data sources. S2BIOM Project Report 1.6 (version 1.2). Chair of Remote Sensing and Landscape Information Systems, Institute of Forest Sciences, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, p 176. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1478483

Dees M, Elbersen B, Fitzgerald J, Vis M, Anttila P, Forsell N, Ramirez-Almeyda J, Glavonjic B, Staritsky I, Verkerk H, Prinz R, Leduc S, Datta P, Lindner M, Zudin S, Höhl M (2017b) Atlas with regional cost supply biomass potentials for EU 28, Western Balkan Countries, Moldavia, Turkey and Ukraine. In: S2BIOM Project Report 1.8 (version 1.1). Chair of Remote Sensing and Landscape Information Systems, Institute of Forest Sciences, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, p 105. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1478500

Di Fulvio F, Forsell N, Lindroos O, Korosuo A, Gusti M (2016) Spatially explicit assessment of roundwood and logging residues availability and costs for the EU28. Scand J Forest Res 31:691-707. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2016.1221128

DOI Google Scholar

Díaz-Yáñez O, Mola-Yudego B, Anttila P, Röser D, Asikainen A (2013) Forest chips for energy in Europe: current procurement methods and potentials. Renew Sust Energ Rev 21:562-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.016

DOI Google Scholar

FAOSTAT (2015) Forestry Production and Trade. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO. Accessed 12 Oct 2015. FAO statistics division

FAOSTAT (2018) Forestry Production and Trade. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO. Accessed 11 Jun 2018. FAO statistics division

Fischer C, Gasparini P, Nylander M, Redmond J, Hernandez L, Brändli U-B, Pastor A, Rizzo M, Alberdi I (2016) Joining criteria for harmonizing European Forest available for wood supply estimates. Case Studies from National Forest Inventories. Forests 7: 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7050104

DOI

Forest Europe (2015) State of Europe's forests 2015. Madrid, p 312

Forest Europe, UNECE, FAO (2011) State of Europe's forests 2011. In: Status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe. Ministerial conference on the protection of forests in Europe, Forest Europe liaison unit Oslo, Ås, p 337

Gallaun H, Zanchi G, Nabuurs G-J, Hengeveld G, Schardt M, Verkerk PJ (2010) EU-wide maps of growing stock and above-ground biomass in forests based on remote sensing and field measurements. Forest Ecol Manag 260:252-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.011

DOI Google Scholar

Jochem D, Weimar H, Bösch M, Mantau U, Dieter M (2015) Estimation of wood removals and fellings in Germany: a calculation approach based on the amount of used roundwood. Eur J Forest Res 134:869-888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-015-0896-9

DOI Google Scholar

Jonsell M (2008) The effects of forest biomass harvesting on biodiversity. In: Röser D, Asikainen A, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Stupak I (eds) Sustainable use of forest biomass for energy a synthesis with focus on the Baltic and Nordic region. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 129-154https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5054-1_6

DOI

Jonsson R, Blujdea V, Fiorese G, Pilli R, Rinaldi F, Baranzelli C, Camia A (2018) Outlook of the European forest-based sector: forest growth, harvest demand, wood-product markets, and forest carbon dynamics implications. iForest - biogeosciences and Forestry 11:315-328. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2636-011

DOI Google Scholar

Kilham P, Kändler G, Hartebrodt C, Stelzer A-S, Schraml U (2018) Designing wood supply Scenarios from Forest inventories with stratified predictions. Forests 9:77

DOI Google Scholar

Koukios E, Monteleone M, Texeira Carrondo MJ, Charalambous A, Girio F, Hernández EL, Mannelli S, ParajóJC PP, Zabaniotou A (2017) Targeting sustainable bioeconomy: a new development strategy for southern European countries. The Manifesto of the European Mezzogiorno Journal of Cleaner Production 172:3931-3941 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.020

DOI Google Scholar

Lainez M, González JM, Aguilar A, Vela C (2017) Spanish strategy on bioeconomy: towards a knowledge based sustainable innovation. New Biotechnol 40:87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.05.006

DOI Google Scholar

Lauri P, Havlík P, Kindermann G, Forsell N, Böttcher H, Obersteiner M (2014) Woody biomass energy potential in 2050. Energy Policy 66:19-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.033

DOI Google Scholar

Leskinen P, Cardellini G, Gonzalez-Garcia S, Hurmekoski E, Sathre R, Seppälä J, Smyth C, Stern T, Verkerk PJ (2018) Substitution effects of wood-based products in climate change mitigation. From Science to Policy 7. European Forest Institute.https://doi.org/10.36333/fs07

DOI

Levers C, Verkerk PJ, Müller D, Verburg PH, Butsic V, Leitão PJ, Lindner M, Kuemmerle T (2014) Drivers of forest harvesting intensity patterns in Europe. Forest Ecol Manag 315:160-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.030

DOI Google Scholar

Lundmark R, Athanassiadis D, Wetterlund E (2015) Supply assessment of forest biomass - a bottom-up approach for Sweden. Biomass Bioenergy 75:213-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.02.022

DOI Google Scholar

Mansuy N, ParéD TE, Bernier PY, Cyr G, Manka F, Lafleur B, Guindon L (2017) Estimating the spatial distribution and locating hotspots of forest biomass from harvest residues and fire-damaged stands in Canada's managed forests. Biomass Bioenergy 97:90-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.12.014

DOI Google Scholar

Masek JG, Cohen WB, Leckie D, Wulder MA, Vargas R, de Jong B, Healey S, Law B, Birdsey R, Houghton RA, Mildrexler D, Goward S, Smith WB (2011) Recent rates of forest harvest and conversion in North America. J Geophys Res 116:G00K03. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001471

DOI Google Scholar

Mola-Yudego B, Arevalo J, Díaz-Yáñez O, Dimitriou I, Freshwater E, Haapala A, Khanam T, Selkimäki M (2017) Reviewing wood biomass potentials for energy in Europe: the role of forests and fast growing plantations. Biofuels 8:401-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2016.1271627

DOI Google Scholar

Moreno A, Neumann M, Hasenauer H (2017) Forest structures across Europe. Geosci Data J 4:17-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.45

DOI Google Scholar

Nabuurs G, Pussinen A, van Brusselen J, Schelhaas M (2007) Future harvesting pressure on European forests. Eur J Forest Res 126:391-400. doi:0.1007/s10342-006-0158-y

DOI Google Scholar

Neumann M, Moreno A, Thurnher C, Mues V, Härkönen S, Mura M, Bouriaud O, Lang M, Cardellini G, Thivolle-Cazat A, Bronisz K, Merganic J, Alberdi I, Astrup R, Mohren F, Zhao M, Hasenauer H (2016) Creating a regional MODIS satellite-driven net primary production dataset for European forests. Remot Sens 8: 554https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8070554

DOI

Paillet Y, Bergès L, Hjältén J, Ódor P, Avon C, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Bijlsma R-J, De Bruyn LUC, Fuhr M, Grandin ULF, Kanka R, Lundin L, Luque S, Magura T, Matesanz S, Mészáros I, Sebastià MT, Schmidt W, Standovár T, Tóthmérész B, Uotila A, Valladares F, Vellak KAI, Virtanen R (2010) Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. Conserv Biol 24:101-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x

DOI Google Scholar

Panoutsou C (2017) Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains. In: Top-Down and Bottom-up Assessment for Agricultural, Forest and Waste Feedstock, Academic Press

Ranius T, Hämäläinen A, Egnell G, Olsson B, Eklöf K, Stendahl J, Rudolphi J, Sténs A, Felton A (2018) The effects of logging residue extraction for energy on ecosystem services and biodiversity: a synthesis. J Environ Manag 209:409-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.048

DOI Google Scholar

Rytter L, Ingerslev M, Kilpeläinen A, Torssonen P, Lazdina D, Löf M, Madsen P, Muiste P, Stener L-G (2016) Increased forest biomass production in the Nordic and Baltic countries - a review on current and future opportunities. Silv Fenn 50:33. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1660

DOI Google Scholar

Sallnäs O (1990) A matrix model of the Swedish forest. Studia Forestalia Suecica 183: 23

San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (2016) European atlas of forest tree species. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

Sathre R, O'Connor J (2010) Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution. Environ Sci Pol 13:104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.12.005

DOI Google Scholar

Scarlat N, Dallemand J-F, Monforti-Ferrario F, Nita V (2015) The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: policies and facts. Environm Develop 15:3-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006

DOI Google Scholar

Schelhaas M-J, Hengeveld GM, Heidema N, Thürig E, Rohner B, Vacchiano G, Vayreda J, Redmond J, Socha J, Fridman J, Tomter S, Polley H, Barreiro S, Nabuurs G-J (2018) Species-specific, pan-European diameter increment models based on data of 2.3 million trees. Forest Ecosyst 5:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-018-0133-3

DOI Google Scholar

Searchinger TD, Beringer T, Holtsmark B, Kammen DM, Lambin EF, Lucht W, Raven P, van Ypersele J-P (2018) Europe's renewable energy directive poised to harm global forests. Nat Commun 9:3741. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06175-4

DOI Google Scholar

Sillanpää M, Ncibi C (2017) A sustainable bioeconomy. The green industrial revolution. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55637-6

DOI

Sing L, Metzger MJ, Paterson JS, Ray D (2018) A review of the effects of forest management intensity on ecosystem services for northern European temperate forests with a focus on the UK. For Intl J For Res 91:151-164. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpx042

DOI Google Scholar

Smeets EMW, Faaij APC (2007) Bioenergy potentials from forestry in 2050. Climat Chang 81:353-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9163-x

DOI Google Scholar

Stjepan P, Mersudin A, Dženan B, Nenad P, Makedonka S, Dane M, Špela PM (2015) Private forest owners' willingness to supply woody biomass in selected south-eastern European countries. Biomass Bioenergy 81:144-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.06.011

DOI Google Scholar

Teobaldelli M, Somogyi Z, Migliavacca M, Usoltsev VA (2009) Generalized functions of biomass expansion factors for conifers and broadleaved by stand age, growing stock and site index. Forest Ecol Manag 257:1004-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.002

DOI Google Scholar

Thurner M, Beer C, Santoro M, Carvalhais N, Wutzler T, Schepaschenko D, Shvidenko A, Kompter E, Ahrens B, Levick SR, Schmullius C (2013) Carbon stock and density of northern boreal and temperate forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:297-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12125

DOI Google Scholar

Tomppo E, Geschwantner T, Lawrence M, McRoberts RE (2010) National Forest Inventories - pathways for common reporting, springer Heidelberg. In: Dordrecht. London, New Yorkhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3233-1

DOI

Tum M, McCallum I, Kindermann G, Günther KP, Schmid E (2013) Sustainable bioenergy potentials for Europe and the globe. Geoinformatics & Geostatistics: An Overview. https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-4581.S1-010

DOI

UNECE-FAO (2000) Forest Resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan and New Zealand. Contribution to the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000, UN, New York and Geneva

UNECE-FAO (2010) Forest product conversion factors for the UNECE region. ECE/TIM/DP/49. United Nations. Timber section, Geneva, p 38

UNECE-FAO (2011) The European Forest sector outlook study II. 2010-2030. In: ECE/TIM/SP/28. United Nations, Geneva

Vance ED, Prisley SP, Schilling EB, Tatum VL, Wigley TB, Lucier AA, Van Deusen PC (2018) Environmental implications of harvesting lower-value biomass in forests. Forest Ecol Manag 407:47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.023

DOI Google Scholar

Vanguelova EI, Pitman R, Benham S, Perks M, Morison JIL (2017) Impact of tree stump harvesting on soil carbon and nutrients and second rotation tree growth in mid-Wales, UK. Open J For 7(1):21. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2017.71005

DOI Google Scholar

Verkerk PJ, Anttila P, Eggers J, Lindner M, Asikainen A (2011) The realisable potential supply of woody biomass from forests in the European Union. Forest Ecol Manag 261:2007-2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.02.027

DOI Google Scholar

Verkerk PJ, Levers C, Kuemmerle T, Lindner M, Valbuena R, Verburg PH, Zudin S (2015b) Data from: mapping wood production in European forests. Dryad Dig Reposit. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.mk067.

DOI

Verkerk PJ, Levers C, Kuemmerle T, Lindner M, Valbuena R, Verburg PH, Zudin S (2015a) Mapping wood production in European forests. Forest Ecol Manag 357:228-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.08.007

DOI Google Scholar

Verkerk PJ, Schelhaas MJ, Immonen V, Hengeveld G, Kiljunen J, Lindner M, Nabuurs GJ, Suominen T, Zudin S (2016) Manual for the European Forest Information Scenario model (EFISCEN 4.1). EFI Technical Report 99. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, p 49

Vis M, Dees M (2011) Biomass Resource Assessment Handbook: Harmonisation of Biomass Resource Assessments. In: Best Practices and Methods Handbook. VDM Verlag Dr, Müller, Saarbrücken

Wallenius T, Niskanen L, Virtanen T, Hottola J, Brumelis G, Angervuori A, Julkunen J, Pihlström M (2010) Loss of habitats, naturalness and species diversity in Eurasian forest landscapes. Ecol Indic 10:1093-1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.03.006

DOI Google Scholar

Walmsley JD, Godbold DL (2010) Stump harvesting for bioenergy - a review of the environmental impacts. Forestry 83:17-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpp028

DOI Google Scholar

Wendland KJ, Lewis DJ, Alix-Garcia J, Ozdogan M, Baumann M, Radeloff VC (2011) Regional- and district-level drivers of timber harvesting in European Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Global Environm Change 21:1290-1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.003

DOI Google Scholar

About this article

Publication history

Acknowledgements

Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 08 August 2018

Accepted: 21 January 2019

Published: 07 February 2019

Issue date: March 2019

Copyright

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all country correspondents who provided recent national forest inventory data for the purpose of this study, as well as all national correspondents and agencies that provided such data during earlier requests or through the internet. The authors also thank three anonymous reviewers for their critical comments on a preliminary version of this article.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.