Journal Home > Volume 9 , Issue 1
Background

Resemblance to raptors such as hawks (Accipiter spp.) is considered to be an adaptive strategy of cuckoos (Cuculus spp.), which has evolved to protect cuckoos against host attacks. However, the effectiveness of the mimicry remains controversial, and is not yet fully studied for highly aggressive hosts.

Methods

We evaluated the effectiveness of sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) mimicry by common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) in oriental reed warblers (Acrocephaus orientalis), which are highly aggressive hosts. Using a both the single and the paired dummy experiment, defense behaviors and attack intensities of oriental reed warblers against common cuckoos, sparrowhawks and oriental turtle doves (Streptopelia orientalis) were assessed.

Results

Oriental reed warblers exhibit strong nest defense behaviors, and such behaviors do not change with breeding stage (i.e., egg stage and nestling stage). Furthermore, assistance from conspecific helpers may increase attack intensities. However, they were deterred from mobbing overall by the presence of the hawk.

Conclusions

Oriental reed warblers are able to distinguish cuckoos from harmless doves. However, they may be deterred from mobbing by the presence of the predatory hawk, suggesting hawk mimicry may be ineffective and does not reduce attacks of cuckoos by highly aggressive hosts.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Hawk mimicry does not reduce attacks of cuckoos by highly aggressive hosts

Show Author's information Laikun MaCanchao YangWei Liang( )
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China

Abstract

Background

Resemblance to raptors such as hawks (Accipiter spp.) is considered to be an adaptive strategy of cuckoos (Cuculus spp.), which has evolved to protect cuckoos against host attacks. However, the effectiveness of the mimicry remains controversial, and is not yet fully studied for highly aggressive hosts.

Methods

We evaluated the effectiveness of sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) mimicry by common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) in oriental reed warblers (Acrocephaus orientalis), which are highly aggressive hosts. Using a both the single and the paired dummy experiment, defense behaviors and attack intensities of oriental reed warblers against common cuckoos, sparrowhawks and oriental turtle doves (Streptopelia orientalis) were assessed.

Results

Oriental reed warblers exhibit strong nest defense behaviors, and such behaviors do not change with breeding stage (i.e., egg stage and nestling stage). Furthermore, assistance from conspecific helpers may increase attack intensities. However, they were deterred from mobbing overall by the presence of the hawk.

Conclusions

Oriental reed warblers are able to distinguish cuckoos from harmless doves. However, they may be deterred from mobbing by the presence of the predatory hawk, suggesting hawk mimicry may be ineffective and does not reduce attacks of cuckoos by highly aggressive hosts.

Keywords: Brood parasitism, Common cuckoo, Attack, Mobbing, Nest defense, Oriental reed warbler

References(62)

Briskie JV. Direct observations of shining cuckoos (Chrysococcyx lucidus) parasitising and depredating grey warbler (Gerygone igata) nests. Notornis. 2007;54:15–9.

Brooke MdL, Davies NB. Egg mimicry by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature. 1988;335:630–2.

Campobello D, Sealy SG. Enemy recognition of reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus): threats and reproductive value act independently in nest defence modulation. Ethology. 2010;116:498–508.

Chance EP. The truth about the cuckoo. London: Country Life; 1940.
Davies NB. Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. London: T & AD Poyser; 2000.

Davies NB. Cuckoo adaptations: trickery and tuning. J Zool. 2011;284:1–14.

Davies NB, Brooke MdL. Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav. 1988;36:262–84.

Davies NB, Brooke MdL. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts I: host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol. 1989;58:207–24.

Davies NB, Welbergen JA. Cuckoo–hawk mimicry? An experimental test. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2008;275:1817–22.

Davies NB, Welbergen JA. Social transmission of a host defense against cuckoo parasitism. Science. 2009;324:1318–20.

Duckworth JW. Responses of breeding reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus to mounts of sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus, cuckoo Cuculus canorus and jay Garrulus glandarius. IBIS. 1991;133:68–74.

Feeney WE, Langmore NE. Social learning of a brood parasite by its host. Biol Lett. 2013;9:20130443.

Feeney WE, Welbergen JA, Langmore NE. The frontline of avian brood parasite–host coevolution. Anim Behav. 2012;84:3–12.

Feeney WE, Troscianko J, Langmore NE, Spottiswoode CN. Evidence for aggressive mimicry in an adult brood parasitic bird, and generalized defences in its host. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2015;282:20150795.

Gill SA, Neudorf DLH, Sealy SG. Do hosts discriminate between sexually dichromatic male and female brown-headed cowbirds? Ethology. 2008;114:548–56.

Götmark F, Post P. Prey selection by sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus: relative predation risk for breeding passerine birds in relation to their size, ecology and behaviour. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 1996;351:1559–77.

Grim T. Host recognition of brood parasites: implications for methodology in studies of enemy recognition. Auk. 2005;122:530–43.

Grim T. Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2007;2007(274):373–81.

Honza M, Taborsky B, Taborsky M, Teuschl Y, Vogl W, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Behaviour of female common cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, in the vicinity of host nests before and during egg laying: a radio telemetry study. Anim Behav. 2002;64:861–8.

Huo J, Yang C, Su T, Liang W, Møller AP. Russet sparrows spot alien chicks from their nests. Avian Res. 2018;9:12.

Krams I, Bērziņš A, Krama T. Group effect in nest defence behaviour of breeding pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav. 2009;77:513–7.

Krama T, Bērziņš A, Rytkönen S, Rantala MJ, Wheatcroft D, Krams I. Linking anti-predator behaviour and habitat quality: group effect in nest defence of a passerine bird. Acta Ethol. 2012;15:127–34

Langmore NE, Kilner RM. The coevolutionary arms race between horsfield's bronze-cuckoos and superb fairy-wrens. Emu. 2010;110:32–8.

Langmore NE, Hunt S, Kilner RM. Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature. 2003;422:157–60.

Langmore NE, Cockburn A, Russell AF, Kilner RM. Flexible cuckoo chick-rejection rules in the superb fairy-wren. Behav Ecol. 2009;20:978–84.

Li D, Wei H, Zhang Z, Liang W, Stokke BG. Oriental reed warbler (Acrocephalus orientalis) nest defence behaviour towards brood parasites and nest predators. Behaviour. 2015;152:1601–21.

Li D, Zhang Z, Grim T, Liang W, Stokke BG. Explaining variation in brood parasitism rates between potential host species with similar habitat requirements. Evol Ecol. 2016;30:905–23.

Liang W. Crafty cuckoo calls. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1427–8.

Liang W, Møller AP. Hawk mimicry in cuckoos and anti-parasitic aggressive behavior of barn swallows in Denmark and China. J Avian Biol. 2015;46:216–23.

Lindholm AK, Thomas RJ. Differences between populations of reed warblers in defences against brood parasitism. Behaviour. 2000;137:25–42.

Ma L, Yang C, Liu J, Zhang J, Liang W, Møller AP. Costs of breeding far away from neighbors: isolated host nests are more vulnerable to cuckoo parasitism. Behav Proc. 2018. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.017.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.017
DOI

Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Hagen LG, Honza M, Mørk C, Olsen PH. Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and host behaviour at reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus nests. IBIS. 2000;142:247–58.

Molnár B. The cuckoo in the Hungarian plain. Aquila. 1944;51:100–12.

Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ. Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol. 1988;63:167–87.

Moskát C. Common cuckoo parasitism in Europe: behavioural adaptations, arms race and the role of metapopulations. Ornithol Sci. 2005;4:3–15.

Moskát C, Honza M. European cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism and host's rejection behaviour in a heavily parasitized great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus population. IBIS. 2002;144:614–22.

Smith S, Hosking E. Birds fighting: experimental studies of the aggressive displays of some birds. London: Faber and Faber; 1955.

Sato NJ, Tokue K, Noske RA, Mikami OK, Ueda K. Evicting cuckoo nestlings from the nest: a new anti-parasitism behaviour. Biol Lett. 2010;6:67–9.

Soler M. Long-term coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Biol Rev. 2014;89:688–704.

Spottiswoode CN, Stevens M. Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:8672–6.

Spottiswoode CN, Stevens M. How to evade a coevolving brood parasite: egg discrimination versus egg variability as host defences. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2011;278:3566–73.

Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Obligate brood parasites as selective agents for evolution of egg appearance in passerine birds. Evolution. 2002;56:199–205.

Su T, Shao L, Huo J, Yang C, Liang W. Himalayan cuckoo fed on eggs of Bianchi's warbler. Chin J Ecol. 2017;36:89–93 (in Chinese).

Thorogood R, Davies NB. Cuckoos combat socially transmitted defenses of reed warbler hosts with a plumage polymorphism. Science. 2012;337:578–80.

Thorogood R, Davies NB. Reed warbler hosts fine-tune their defenses to track three decades of cuckoo decline. Evolution. 2013a;67:3545–55.

Thorogood R, Davies NB. Hawk mimicry and the evolution of polymorphic cuckoos. Chin Birds. 2013b;4:39–50.

Thorogood R, Davies NB. Combining personal with social information facilitates host defences and explains why cuckoos should be secretive. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19872.

Trnka A, Prokop P. Polygynous great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus suffer more cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism than monogamous pairs. J Avian Biol. 2011;42:192–5.

Trnka A, Prokop P. The effectiveness of hawk mimicry in protecting cuckoos from aggressive hosts. Anim Behav. 2012;83:263–8.

Trnka A, Prokop P, Grim T. Uncovering dangerous cheats: how do avian hosts recognize adult brood parasites? PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37445.

Welbergen JA, Davies NB. Reed warblers discriminate cuckoos from sparrowhawks with graded alarm signals that attract mates and neighbours. Anim Behav. 2008;76:811–22.

Welbergen JA, Davies NB. Strategic variation in mobbing as a front line of defense against brood parasitism. Curr Biol. 2009;19:235–40.

Welbergen JA, Davies NB. A parasite in wolf's clothing: hawk mimicry reduces mobbing of cuckoos by hosts. Behav Ecol. 2011;22:574–9.

Wyllie I. The cuckoo. London: Batsford; 1981

Yang C, Li D, Wang L, Liang G, Zhang Z, Liang W. Geographic variation in parasitism rates of two sympatric cuckoo hosts in China. Zool Res. 2014;35:67–71.

Yang C, Wang L, Chen M, Liang W, Møller AP. Nestling recognition in red-rumped and barn swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69:1–6.

Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP. Egg recognition as antiparasitism defence in hosts does not select for laying of matching eggs in parasitic cuckoos. Anim Behav. 2016;122:177–81.

Yang C, Wang L, Liang W, Møller AP. How cuckoos find and choose host nests for parasitism. Behav Ecol. 2017;28:859–65.

York JE, Davies NB. Female cuckoo calls misdirect host defences towards the wrong enemy. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1520–5.

Yu J, Wang L, Xing X, Yang C, Ma J, Møller AP, Wang H, Liang W. Barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) differentiate between common cuckoo and sparrowhawk in China: alarm calls convey information on threat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2016;70:171–8.

Yu J, Xing X, Jiang Y, Liang W, Wang H, Møller AP. Alarm call-based discrimination between common cuckoo and Eurasian sparrowhawk in a Chinese population of great tits. Ethology. 2017;123:542–50.

Zheng G. A checklist on the classification and distribution of the birds of China. 3rd ed. Beijing: Science Press; 2017.

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 31 May 2018
Accepted: 15 October 2018
Published: 31 October 2018
Issue date: January 2018

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Rose Thorogood and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an early version of this manuscript. We thank the Forestry Bureau of Yongnian County, Hebei Province, China, for permission to undertake this study including all experimental procedures. We are grateful to Jianping Liu, Jianwei Zhang, Bo Zhou and Xiaodong Rao for their assistance with fieldwork.

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Return