AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Validity and reliability of V ˙ O 2 max determination immediately after a maximal fat oxidation assessment in pre-diabetes/type 2 Diabetes Mellitus population

Alberto Marín-Galindoa, Edgardo Opazo-Diaza,b, Miguel Ramirez-Jimeneza,c, Adrián Montes-de-Oca-Garcíaa, Juan Corral-Péreza( ), Alejandro Perez-Beyd, Cristina Casalsa, Jesus G. Ponce-Gonzaleza
ExPhy Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Universidad de Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain
Exercise Physiology Lab, Physical Therapy Department, University of Chile, Chile
Valoración del Rendimiento Deportivo, Actividad Física y Salud, y Lesiones Deportivas (REDAFLED), Universidad de Valladolid, Soria, Spain
GALENO Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Universidad de Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain

Peer review under the responsibility of Editorial Board of Sports Medicine and Health Science

Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Measuring maximal fat oxidation (MFO) and maximal oxygen consumption ( V ˙ O 2 max ) typically requires two separate days, which can be time-consuming. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a single-day test for measuring MFO and V ˙ O 2 max in individuals with pre-diabetes/type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Methods

Twenty adults with pre-diabetes/T2DM (10 women; [53.1 ​± ​8.8] years) participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants underwent a single-day MFO- V ˙ O 2 max protocol, followed by the traditional V ˙ O 2 max test on a cycle ergometer 4–7 days later, with both assessments performed using indirect calorimetry. The single-day test commenced with the MFO test, involving 15 ​W per 3 ​min increments until the respiratory exchange rate reached 1.0. After a 5-minute (min) rest, the V ˙ O 2 max test was conducted, starting at the last load and increasing by 15 ​W·min-1 until voluntary exhaustion. The traditional V ˙ O 2 max test involved a 15 ​W·min-1n incremental protocol until voluntary exhaustion, followed by a verification test at 110% of the previous maximum load.

Results

No significant differences were observed between M F O − V ˙ O 2 max and traditional V ˙ O 2 max protocol in V ˙ O 2 max values ([2099.4 ​± ​534.1] ml·min-1 vs. [2119.1 ​± ​548.3] ml·min-1, p ​= ​0.715) or heart rate ([163.2 ​± ​18.2] beat/min vs. [164.5 ​± ​16.1] beat/min, p ​= ​0.485). The M F O − V ˙ O 2 max protocol test demonstrated excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ​= ​0.957), limits of agreement ranging from 300.06 ​ml·min-1 to −306.77 ​ml·min-1, and the standard error of measurement was 181.67 ​ml·min-1.

Conclusions

Therefore, the single-day test is a valid and reliable method for assessing both MFO and V ˙ O 2 max in men and women with pre-diabetes/T2DM. With a mean total duration of (34 ​± ​8) min, this test enhances clinical applicability by significantly reducing the time and cost associated with traditional assessments.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Pages 327-334

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Marín-Galindo A, Opazo-Diaz E, Ramirez-Jimenez M, et al. Validity and reliability of V ˙ O 2 max determination immediately after a maximal fat oxidation assessment in pre-diabetes/type 2 Diabetes Mellitus population. Sports Medicine and Health Science, 2026, 8(3): 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhs.2025.02.004

351

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 03 September 2024
Revised: 07 February 2025
Accepted: 18 February 2025
Published: 21 February 2025
© 2025 Chengdu Sport University.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).