AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Self-standing oxygen-deficient α-MoO3-x nanoflake arrays as 3D cathode for advanced all-solid-state thin film lithium batteries

Shuo Suna,b,1Qiuying Xiaa,b,1Jizi Liua,bJing Xua,bFeng Zana,bJili Yuea,bSerguei V. SavilovcValery V. LunincHui Xiaa,b( )
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China
Herbert Gleiter Institute of Nanoscience, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China
Department of Chemistry, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia

1Both authors contributed equally to this work. ]]>

Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Compared with the planar two-dimensional (2D) all-solid-state thin film batteries (TFBs), three-dimensional (3D) all-solid-state TFBs with interdigitated contact between electrode and electrolyte possess great advantage in achieving both high energy and power densities. Herein, we report a facile fabrication of vertically aligned oxygen-deficient α-MoO3-x nanoflake arrays (3D MOx) using metal Mo target by direct current (DC) magnetron sputtering. By utilizing the 3D MOx cathode, amorphous lithium phosphorus oxynitride solid electrolyte, and lithium thin film anode, 3D solid-state TFBs have been successfully fabricated, exhibiting high specific capacity (266 mAh g−1 at 50 mA g−1), good rate performance (110 mAh g−1 at 1000 mA g−1), and excellent cycle performance (92.7% capacity retention after 1000 cycles) in comparison with the 2D TFBs using the planar MOx thin film as cathode. The superior electrochemical performance of the 3D TFBs can be attributed to the 3D architecture of the cathode, maximizing the cathode/electrolyte interface while retaining the short Li+ diffusion length. The charge/discharge measurements of the 3D MOx cathode in liquid electrolyte, however, exhibit fast capacity fading, demonstrating the advantage of using transition metal oxide as cathode in solid-state batteries.

References

[1]

Zhou YN, Xue MZ, Fu ZW. Nanostructured thin film electrodes for lithium storage and all-solid-state thin-film lithium batteries. J Power Sources 2013;234:310-2.

[2]

Kim JG, Son B, Mukherjee S, Schuppert N, Bates A, Kwon O, et al. A review of lithium and non-lithium based solid state batteries. J Power Sources 2015;282. 299-2

[3]

Oudenhoven JFM, Baggetto L, Notten PHL. All-solid-state lithium-ion microbatteries: a review of various three-dimensional concepts. Adv Energy Mater 2011;1:10–33.

[4]

Simon P, Gogotsi Y. Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat Mater 2008;7:845–54.

[5]

Scrosati B, Garche J. Lithium batteries: status, prospects and future. J Power Sources 2010;195:2419–30.

[6]

Goodenough JB. Rechargeable batteries: challenges old and new. J Solid State Electrochem 2012;16:2019–29.

[7]
Brodd RJ. What are batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors? Chem Rev 2005;105. 1021-1 (Chem Rev 2003, 104, 4245–4269. Published on the Web 09/28/2004.).
[8]

Ren Y, Liu T, Shen Y, Lin Y, Nan CW. Chemical compatibility between garnet-like solid state electrolyte Li6.75La 3Zr1.75Ta0.25O12 and major commercial lithium battery cathode materials. J Materiomics 2016;2:256–64.

[9]

Gao Z, Sun H, Lin F, Ye F, Yi Z, Wei L, Huang Y. Promises, challenges, and recent progress of inorganic solid-state electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries. Adv Mater 2018;30:1705702.

[10]

Bachman JC, Muy S, Grimaud A, Chang HH, Pour N, Lux SF, Paschos O, Maglia F, Lupart S, Lamp P. Inorganic solid-state electrolytes for lithium batteries: mechanisms and properties governing ion conduction. Chem Rev 2016;47:140–62.

[11]

Talin AA, Ruzmetov D, Kolmakov A, Mckelvey K, Ware N, El GF, Dunn B, White HS. Fabrication, testing, and simulation of all-solid-state three-dimensional Li-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017;8:32385–91.

[12]

Cras FL, Pecquenard B, Dubois V, Phan VP, Guy-Bouyssou D. All-solid-state lithium-ion microbatteries using silicon nanofilm anodes: high performance and memory effect. Adv Energy Mater 2015;5:1501061.

[13]

Létiche M, Eustache E, Freixas J, Demortière A, De Andrade V, Morgenroth L, Tilmant P, Vaurette F, Troadec D, Roussel P. Atomic layer deposition of functional layers for on chip 3D Li-ion all solid state microbattery. Adv Energy Mater 2018;7:1601402–13.

[14]

Xia Q, Jabeen N, Savilov SV, Aldoshin SM, Xia H. Black mesoporous Li4Ti5O12−δ nanowall arrays with improved rate performance as advanced 3D anodes for microbatteries. J Mater Chem A 2016;4:17543–51.

[15]

Xu F, Yu F, Liu C, Han P, Weng B. Hierarchical carbon cloth supported Li4Ti5O12@NiCo2O4 branched nanowire arrays as novel anode for flexible lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 2017;354:85–91.

[16]

Kim JG, Lee SH, Kim Y, Kim WB. Fabrication of free-standing ZnMn2O4 mesoscale tubular arrays for lithium-ion anodes with highly reversible lithium storage properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013;5. 11321-8. dx.

[17]

Xue L, Savilov SV, Lunin VV, Xia H. Self-standing porous LiCoO2 nanoflake arrays as 3D cathodes for flexible Li-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 2017;28:1705836–45.

[18]

Xia H, Xia Q, Lin B, Zhu J, Seo JK, Meng YS. Self-standing porous LiMn2O4 nanowall arrays as promising cathodes for advanced 3D microbatteries and flexible lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 2016;22:475–82.

[19]

Wu K, Zhan J, Xu G, Zhang C, Pan D, Wu M. MoO3 nanoflake arrays as superior anode materials for Li- and Na-ion batteries. Nanoscale 2018;10:16040–9.

[20]

Zhang G, Xiong T, Yan M, He L, Liao X, He C, Yin C, Zhang H, Mai L. α-MoO3-x by plasma etching with improved capacity and stabilized structure for lithium storage. Nano Energy 2018;49:555–63.

[21]

Shen S, Guo W, Xia X, et al. A synergistic vertical graphene skeleton and S–C shell to construct high-performance TiNb2O7-based core/shell arrays. J Mater Chem A 2018;6:20195–204.

[22]

Deng S, Xie D, Xia X, et al. Boosting sodium ion storage by anchoring MoO2 on vertical graphene arrays. J Mater Chem A 2018;6:15546–52.

[23]

Cheng L, Shao M, Wang X, Hu H. Single-crystalline molybdenum trioxide nanoribbons: photocatalytic, photoconductive, and electrochemical properties. Chemistry 2010;15:2310–6.

[24]

Liu H, Lee CJJ, Jin Y, Yang J, Yang C, Chi D. Huge absorption edge blue shifts of layered α-MoO3 crystals upon thickness reduction approaching 2D nanoflakes. J Phys Chem C 2018;122:12122–30.

[25]

He T, Yao J. Photochromism of molybdenum oxide. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 2003;4:125–43.

[26]

Sun Y, Wang J, Zhao B, Cai R, Ran R, Shao Z. Binder-free α-MoO3 nanobelt electrode for lithium-ion batteries utilizing van der Waals forces for film formation and connection with current collector. J Mater Chem A 2013;1:4736–46.

[27]

Zheng L, Xu Y, Jin D, Xie Y. Novel metastable hexagonal MoO3 nanobelts: synthesis, photochromic, and electrochromic properties. Chem Mater 2009;21:5681–90.

[28]

Zhong M, Zhou K, Wei Z, Li Y, Li T, Dong H, Jiang L, Li J, Hu W. Highly anisotropic solar-blind UV photodetector based on large-size two-dimensional α-MoO3 atomic crystals. 2D Mater 2018;5, 035033.

[29]

Yan D, Luo X, Zhang H, Zhu G, Chen L, Chen G, Xu H, Yu A. Single-crystalline α-MoO3 microbelts derived from a bio-templating method for superior lithium storage application. J Alloy Comp 2016;688:481–6.

[30]

Wei X, Jiao L, Sun J, Liu S, Yuan H. Synthesis, electrochemical, and gas sensitivity performance of polyaniline/MoO3 hybrid materials. J Solid State Electrochem 2010;14:197–202.

[31]

Zhan J, Deng, Zhong Y, Wang Y, Wang X, Yu Y, Xia X, Tu J. Exploring hydrogen molybdenum bronze for sodium ion storage: performance enhancement by vertical graphene core and conductive polymer shell. Nano Energy 2018;44:265–71.

[32]

Bates JB, Dudney NJ, et al. Thin-film rechargeable lithium batteries. J Power Sources 1995;54:58–62.

[33]

Wang Z, Santhanagopalan D, Zhang W, Wang F, Xin HL, He K, Li J, Dudney N, Meng YS. In situ STEM-EELS observation of nanoscale interfacial phenomena in all-solid-state batteries. Nano Lett 2016;16:3760–7.

[34]

Wang Z, Lee JZ, Xin HL, Han L, Grillon N, Guy-Bouyssou D, Bouyssou E, Proust M, Meng YS. Effects of cathode electrolyte interfacial (CEI) layer on long term cycling of all-solid-state thin-film batteries. J Power Sources 2016;324:342–8.

[35]

Wang Z, Santhanagopalan D, Zhang W, Wang F, Xin HL, He K, Li J, Dudney NJ, Meng YS. In situ STEM/EELS observation of nanoscale interfacial phenomena in all-solid-state batteries. Nano Lett 2016;16:3760–7.

[36]

Iriyama Y, Yada C, Abe T, Ogumi Z, Kikuchi K. A new kind of all-solid-state thin-film-type lithium-ion battery developed by applying a D.C. high voltage. Electrochem Commun 2006;8:1287–91.

[37]
Nadimicherla Reddeppa, Liu YL, Chen KQ, Chen W. Electrochemical performance of new a-MoO3 nanobelt cathode materials for rechargeable Li-ion batteries, vol. 34; 2014. p. 43–8.
Journal of Materiomics
Pages 229-236
Cite this article:
Sun S, Xia Q, Liu J, et al. Self-standing oxygen-deficient α-MoO3-x nanoflake arrays as 3D cathode for advanced all-solid-state thin film lithium batteries. Journal of Materiomics, 2019, 5(2): 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2019.01.001

120

Views

38

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

42

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 30 October 2018
Revised: 29 November 2018
Accepted: 02 January 2019
Published: 04 January 2019
© 2019 The Chinese Ceramic Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return