AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.9 MB)
Collect
AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Discrepancies between predictions of mainstream empirical growth models and observed forest growth of Pinus radiata (D. Don) plantations in New Zealand

Serajis Salekin( )Yvette DickinsonJo LiddellChristine DodunskiPriscilla LadSteven DoveyDonald A. WhiteDavid Pont
Scion, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd., Rotorua 3046, New Zealand

Peer review under the responsibility of Editorial Office of Forest Ecosystems.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Pinus radiata (D. Don) dominates New Zealand's forestry industry, constituting 91% of plantations, and is among the world's most important plantation species. Given the socio-economic and environmental importance of this species, it is important to have accurate and precise projections over time to make efficient decisions for forest management and greenfield investments in afforestation projects, especially for permanent carbon forests. Future projections of any natural resource systems rely on modeling; however, the acceleration of climate change makes future projections of yield less certain. These challenges also impact national expectations of the contribution planted forests will provide to address climate change and meet international commitments under the Paris Agreement. Using a large national-scale set of contemporary ground-measured data (2013–2023), this study investigates the performance of two growth models developed over 30 years ago that are widely used by NZ plantation growers: 1) the Pumice Plateau Model 1988 (PPM88) and 2) the 300-index (including a model variant of regional drift). Model simulations were made using the FORECASTER modeling suite with geographic boundaries to adjust for drift in space and time. Basal area (BA, m2·ha−1) and volume (m3·ha−1) were simulated, and standard errors and goodness-of-fit metrics calculated up to a typical rotation age of 30 years. Model residuals were then separated and analysed for the main plantation growing regions. The models overpredicted observed growth by between 6.8% and 16.2%, but model predictions and errors varied significantly between regions. The results of this study provided clear evidence of divergence between the outputs of both models and the measured data. Finally, this study suggests future measures to address challenges posed by these discrepancies that will provide better information for forest management and investment decisions in a changing climate.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Forest Ecosystems

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Salekin S, Dickinson Y, Liddell J, et al. Discrepancies between predictions of mainstream empirical growth models and observed forest growth of Pinus radiata (D. Don) plantations in New Zealand. Forest Ecosystems, 2026, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2025.100404

397

Views

22

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 13 May 2025
Revised: 29 October 2025
Accepted: 29 October 2025
Published: 01 February 2026
© 2025 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).