Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
The inflection point is an important feature of sigmoidal height-diameter (H-D) models. It is often cited as one of the properties favoring sigmoidal model forms. However, there are very few studies analyzing the inflection points of H-D models. The goals of this study were to theoretically and empirically examine the behaviors of inflection points of six common H-D models with a regional dataset. The six models were the Wykoff (WYK), Schumacher (SCH), Curtis (CUR), Hossfeld Ⅳ (HOS), von Bertalanffy-Richards (VBR), and Gompertz (GPZ) models. The models were first fitted in their base forms with tree species as random effects and were then expanded to include functional traits and spatial distribution. The distributions of the estimated inflection points were similar between the two-parameter models WYK, SCH, and CUR, but were different between the three-parameter models HOS, VBR, and GPZ. GPZ produced some of the largest inflection points. HOS and VBR produced concave H-D curves without inflection points for 12.7% and 39.7% of the tree species. Evergreen species or decreasing shade tolerance resulted in larger inflection points. The trends in the estimated inflection points of HOS and VBR were entirely opposite across the landscape. Furthermore, HOS could produce concave H-D curves for portions of the landscape. Based on the studied behaviors, the choice between two-parameter models may not matter. We recommend comparing several three-parameter model forms for consistency in estimated inflection points before deciding on one. Believing sigmoidal models to have inflection points does not necessarily mean that they will produce fitted curves with one. Our study highlights the need to integrate analysis of inflection points into modeling H-D relationships.
Adame, P., del Río, M., Cañellas, I., 2008. A mixed nonlinear height–diameter model for pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.). For. Ecol. Manag. 256, 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.006.
Aishan, T., Halik, Ü., Betz, F., Gärtner, P., Cyffka, B., 2016. Modeling height–diameter relationship for Populus euphratica in the Tarim riparian forest ecosystem, Northwest China. J. For. Res. 27, 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0222-5.
Bi, H., Fox, J.C., Li, Y., Lei, Y., Pang, Y., 2012. Evaluation of nonlinear equations for predicting diameter from tree height. Can. J. For. Res. 42, 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1139/x2012-019.
Bronisz, K., Mehtätalo, L., 2020. Mixed-effects generalized height–diameter model for young silver birch stands on post-agricultural lands. For. Ecol. Manag. 460, 117901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117901.
Castedo-Dorado, F., Crecente-Campo, F., Álvarez-Álvarez, P., Barrio-Anta, M., 2009. Development of a stand density management diagram for radiata pine stands including assessment of stand stability. Forestry 82, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpm032.
Ciceu, A., Chakraborty, D., Ledermann, T., 2023. Examining the transferability of height–diameter model calibration strategies across studies. Forestry. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpad063.
Crecente-Campo, F., Corral-Rivas, J.J., Vargas-Larreta, B., Wehenkel, C., 2014. Can random components explain differences in the height–diameter relationship in mixed uneven-aged stands? Ann. For. Sci. 71, 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0332-6.
Curtis, R.O., 1967. Height-diameter and height-diameter-age equations for second-growth Douglas-Fir. For. Sci. 13, 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/13.4.365.
Ducey, M.J., 2012. Evergreenness and wood density predict height–diameter scaling in trees of the northeastern United States. For. Ecol. Manag. 279, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.034.
Fang, Z., Bailey, R.L., 1998. Height–diameter models for tropical forests on Hainan Island in southern China. For. Ecol. Manag. 110, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00297-7.
Furnival, G.M., 1961. An index for comparing equations used in constructing volume tables. For. Sci. 7, 337–341.
Gao, H., Cui, K., von Gadow, K., Wang, X., 2023. Using functional traits to improve estimates of height–diameter allometry in a temperate mixed forest. Forests 14, 1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14081604.
Gompertz, B., 1825. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 115, 513–583.
Greenhill, A.G., 1881. Determination of the greatest height consistent with stability that a vertical pole or mast can be made, and the greatest height to which a tree of given proportions can grow. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 4, 65–73.
Han, Y., Lei, Z., Ciceu, A., Zhou, Y., Zhou, F., Yu, D., 2021. Determining an accurate and cost-effective individual height-diameter model for Mongolian pine on sandy land. Forests 12, 1144. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091144.
Huang, S., Price, D., Titus, S.J., 2000. Development of ecoregion-based height–diameter models for white spruce in boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 129, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00151-6.
Huang, S., Titus, S.J., Wiens, D.P., 1992. Comparison of nonlinear height–diameter functions for major Alberta tree species. Can. J. For. Res. 22, 1297–1304. https://doi.org/10.1139/x92-172.
Kruchelski, S., Trautenmüller, J.W., Orso, G.A., Roncatto, E., Triches, G.P., Behling, A., de Moraes, A., 2022. Modeling of the height-diameter relationship in eucalyptus in integrated crop-livestock systems. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 57, e02785. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2022.v57.02785.
Lam, T.Y., Kershaw, J.A. Jr., Nur Hajar, Z.S., Abd Rahman, K., Weiskittel, A.R., Potts, M.D., 2017. Evaluating and modelling genus and species variation in height-todiameter relationships for Tropical Hill Forests in Peninsular Malaysia. Forestry 90, 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpw051.
Lei, Y.C., Zhang, S.Y., 2004. Features and partial derivatives of Bertalanffy-Richards growth model in forestry. Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control 9, 65–73.
Liu, S., Liu, Y., Li, G., Mou, C., 2023. Disentangling interspecific and intraspecific variability in height–diameter allometry of dominant tree species in the Rocky Mountains across broad spatial scales. Forestry 97, 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpad048.
Long, S., Zeng, S., Liu, F., Wang, G., 2020. Influence of slope, aspect and competition index on the height-diameter relationship of Cyclobalanopsis glauca trees for improving prediction of height in mixed forests. Silva Fenn. 54, 10242. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10242.
Lujan-Soto, J.E., Corral-Rivas, J.J., Aguirre-Calderón, O.A., Gadow, K. v., 2015. Grouping forest tree species on the Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico. Allg. Forst-u J-Ztg. 186, 63–71.
MacPhee, C., Kershaw, J.A., Weiskittel, A.R., Golding, J., Lavigne, M.B., 2018. Comparison of approaches for estimating individual tree height–diameter relationships in the Acadian forest region. Forestry 91, 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpx039.
Marziliano, P.A., Tognetti, R., Lombardi, F., 2019. Is tree age or tree size reducing height increment in Abies alba Mill. at its southernmost distribution limit? Ann. For. Sci. 76, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0803-5.
McMahon, T.A., 1973. Size and shape in biology. Science 179, 1201–1204. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4079.1201.
Mehtätalo, L., de-Miguel, S., Gregoire, T.G., 2015. Modeling height-diameter curves for prediction. Can. J. For. Res. 45, 826–837. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0054.
Nigul, K., Padari, A., Kiviste, A., Noe, S.M., Korjus, H., Laarmann, D., Frelich, L.E., Jõgiste, K., Stanturf, J.A., Paluots, T., Põldveer, E., Kängsepp, V., Jürgenson, H., Metslaid, M., Kangur, A., 2021. The possibility of using the Chapman–Richards and Näslund functions to model height–diameter relationships in hemiboreal old-growth forest in Estonia. Forests 12, 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020184.
Niinemets, Ü., Valladares, F., 2006. Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate northern hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecol. Monogr. 76, 521–547. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076[0521:TTSDAW]2.0.CO;2.
O'Brien, S.T., Hubbell, S.P., Spiro, P., Condit, R., Foster, R.B., 1995. Diameters, height, crown, and age relationships in eight neotropical tree species. Ecology 76, 1926–1939. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940724.
Özçelik, R., Yavuz, H., Karatepe, Y., Gürlevik, N., Kiriş, R., 2014. Development of ecoregion-based height-diameter models for 3 economically important tree species of southern Turkey. Turk. J. Agric. For. 38, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1304-115.
Paulo, J.A., Tomé, J., Tomé, M., 2011. Nonlinear fixed and random generalized height–diameter models for Portuguese cork oak stands. Ann. For. Sci. 68, 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0041-y.
Peschel, W., 1938. Mathematical methods for growth studies of trees and forest stands and the results of their application. Tharandter. Forstl. Jahrb. 89, 169–247.
Pilli, R., Anfodillo, T., Carrer, M., 2006. Towards a functional and simplified allometry for estimating forest biomass. For. Ecol. Manag. 237, 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.10.004.
Raptis, D.I., Kazana, V., Kazaklis, A., Stamatiou, C., 2021. Mixed-effects height–diameter models for black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) forest management. Trees (Berl.) 35, 1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02106-x.
Richards, F.J., 1959. A flexible growth function for empirical use. J. Exp. Bot. 10, 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/10.2.290.
Schumacher, F.X., 1939. A new growth curve and its application to timber yield studies. J. Fr. 37, 819–820.
Shen, J., Hu, Z., Sharma, R.P., Wang, G., Meng, X., Wang, M., Wang, Q., Fu, L., 2020. Modeling height–diameter relationship for poplar plantations using combinedoptimization multiple hidden layer back propagation neural network. Forests 11, 442. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040442.
Somers, G.L., Farrar Jr., R.M., 1991. Biomathematical growth equations for natural longleaf pine stands. For. Sci. 37, 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/37.1.227.r.
Temesgen, H., Hann, D.W., Monleon, V.J., 2007. Regional height–diameter equations for major tree species of Southwest Oregon. West. J. Appl. For. 22, 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/22.3.213.
Thomas, S.C., 1996. Relative size at onset of maturity in rain forest trees: a comparative analysis of 37 Malaysian species. Oikos 76, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545756.
Tjørve, K.M.C., Tjørve, E., 2017. The use of Gompertz models in growth analyses, and new Gompertz-model approach: an addition to the Unified-Richards family. PLoS One 12, e0178691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178691.
Vargas-Larreta, B., Castedo-Dorado, F., Álvarez-González, J.G., Barrio-Anta, M., Cruz-Cobos, F., 2009. A generalized height–diameter model with random coefficients for uneven-aged stands in El Salto, Durango (Mexico). Forestry 82, 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpp016.
West, G.B., Brown, J.H., Enquist, B.J., 2001. A general model for ontogenetic growth. Nature 413, 628–631. https://doi.org/10.1038/35098076.
Zang, H., Lei, X., Zeng, W., 2016. Height–diameter equations for larch plantations in northern and northeastern China: a comparison of the mixed-effects, quantile regression and generalized additive models. Forestry 89, 434–445. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpw022.
Zhang, X., Chhin, S., Fu, L., Lu, L., Duan, A., Zhang, J., 2019. Climate-sensitive tree height–diameter allometry for Chinese fir in southern China. Forestry 92, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpy043.
Zucchini, W., Schmidt, M., Gadow, K.v., 2001. A model for the diameter-height distribution in an uneven-aged beech forest and a method to assess the fit of such models. Silva Fenn. 35, 594. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.594.
149
Views
11
Downloads
0
Crossref
1
Web of Science
1
Scopus
0
CSCD
Altmetrics
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).