AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Unlocking the potentials of depleted gas fields: A numerical evaluation of underground CO2 storage and geothermal energy harvesting

Amrou Al-Alawia, Mingjie Chena ( ), El Hadi Mazouzb, Tartil Al-Abria, Usman Taurac, Mohammad Reza Nikood, Ali Al-Maktoumia
Water Research Center, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
Laboratory of Natural Resources and Management of Sensitive Environments, University of Larbi Ben M'Hidi, Oum-El-Bouaghi, Algeria
Oil & Gas Research Center, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman

Handling Editor: Jian Cao

Peer review under the responsibility of Editorial Board of Energy Geoscience.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Using partial underground CO2 storage as a working agent to harvest geothermal energy is a promising carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) method. It is particularly economically feasible to use or retrofit the existing infrastructure of a hydrocarbon field. Although technical advantages of integrated CO2 sequestration and CO2-circulated geothermal harvest using depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs have been reported, quantitative evaluations of economic benefits using existing wells of realistic reservoirs are rare. In this study, a 3-D hydrothermal flow model is built for the Triassic Argilo-Gréseux Supérieur (TAGS) Formation of the Toual gas field, Algeria using Schlumberger Petrel and CMG-STARS software. A three-phase operational scheme is proposed for sequential CO2 sequestration and CO2-circulated geothermal extraction over 100 years. The first phase is injecting CO2 for 30 years, followed by concurrent cold CO2 injection and hot CO2 extraction in the developed CO2 plume (circulation) for 40 years as the second phase. In the third phase, producing wells in the second phase are converted to injection wells while outer wells start to extract hot CO2 for another 30 years. Scenario 1 is simulated using the selected nine existing wells of the field, while an optimized Scenario 2 is designed and simulated by adding seven newly drilled wells in addition to the existing wells. Scenario 3 shares the same numerical simulation of Scenario 1, but assumes the selected nine existing wells are newly drilled for the economic evaluation. Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), Net Present Value (NPV), and Return on Investment (ROI) are used as economic indicators. The results demonstrate that Scenario 2, which combines the use of existing and newly drilled wells, yields improved economic metrics compared to Scenario 1: 0.97 USD/MWh vs. 1.54 USD/MWh for LCOE and $2.9M vs. $1.1M for NPV. Both scenarios represent profitable endeavors, with ROI values of 1.3 % and 1.5 %, respectively. In contrast, Scenario 3 represents the worst-case scenario, with the highest LCOE at 2.90 USD/MWh and the lowest NPV and ROI at -$0.4M and -0.2 %, respectively. The negative NPV and ROI in Scenario 3 indicates that CO2-circulated geothermal harvesting in aquifers or giant depleted hydrocarbon fields, without leveraging existing infrastructure, is economically infeasible.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Energy Geoscience
Article number: 100395

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Al-Alawi A, Chen M, Mazouz EH, et al. Unlocking the potentials of depleted gas fields: A numerical evaluation of underground CO2 storage and geothermal energy harvesting. Energy Geoscience, 2025, 6(2): 100395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2025.100395

1099

Views

8

Downloads

7

Crossref

7

Web of Science

8

Scopus

Received: 10 October 2024
Revised: 20 January 2025
Accepted: 05 March 2025
Published: 07 August 2025
© 2025 Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute Corporation, SINOPEC.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).