AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (6.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Prediction on rock strength by mineral composition from machine learning of ECS logs

Dongwen Lia,b,c, Xinlong Lib,c, Li Liub,c, Wenhao Heb,c( ), Yongxin Lib,c, Shuowen Lid, Huaizhong Shid, Gaojian Fanb,c
College of Artificial Intelligence, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing, 102249, China
Beijing Key Laboratory of Optical Detection Technology for Oil and Gas, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, 102249, China
Basic Research Center for Energy Interdisciplinary, College of Science, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, 102249, China
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, 102249, China

Handling Editor: Li Dong

Peer review under the responsibility of Editorial Board of Energy Geoscience.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Rock strength evaluation is critical in oil and gas exploration, but traditional methods, such as empirical formulas, laboratory tests, and numerical simulations, often struggle with accuracy, generalizability, and alignment with field conditions. This study proposes the use of Random Forest and Transformer algorithms to predict rock strength from Elemental Capture Spectroscopy (ECS) logs. By utilizing the dry weight of minerals as input, the model predicts key mechanical properties, including Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, bulk modulus, shear modulus, and uniaxial compressive strength. The findings demonstrate that mineral compositions, such as clay, quartz-feldspar-mica, carbonate, anhydrite, and pyrite, significantly influence rock strength. Specifically, clay content impacts Young's modulus, bulk modulus, and shear modulus, while quartz-feldspar-mica affects Poisson's ratio, and anhydrite is the primary factor influencing compressive strength. Positive correlations were observed between rock strength and the dry weight of anhydrite and carbonate minerals, while negative correlations emerged with clay, pyrite, and quartz-feldspar-mica. The Random Forest model outperformed the Transformer model in terms of predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. Its training time is only one three hundredth of the latter and its prediction time is just one tenth of the later, making it highly suitable for well-logging interpretation. Although the Transformer model was less computationally efficient, it exhibited strengths in predicting subsurface strength parameters, particularly in capturing spatial variations and forecasting these parameters across different spatial locations. This study introduces a novel AI-driven approach to rock strength evaluation, bridging the gap between mineral composition and mechanical properties, with significant implications for resource extraction and reservoir management.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Energy Geoscience
Article number: 100386

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Li D, Li X, Liu L, et al. Prediction on rock strength by mineral composition from machine learning of ECS logs. Energy Geoscience, 2025, 6(2): 100386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2025.100386

1073

Views

17

Downloads

10

Crossref

10

Web of Science

9

Scopus

Received: 02 September 2024
Revised: 11 December 2024
Accepted: 10 February 2025
Published: 07 August 2025
© 2025 Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute Corporation, SINOPEC.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).