AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (7.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Application of fractal model in the Jurassic tight sandstone reservoirs of central Junggar Basin as constrained by mercury ejection curves

Hongkang Zhaoa, Xiangchun Changa,b( ), Tianchen Gea, Zhiping Zengc, Junjian Zhanga, Daiqi Minga, Runye Hana
College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong, 266590, China
Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resources, Qingdao Marine Science and Technology Center, Qingdao, Shandong, 266237, China
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying, Shandong, 257001, China

Handling editor: Yanbin Yao

Show Author Information

Abstract

The high-pressure mercury intrusion (HPMI) experiment is widely used to assess the pore architecture of tight sandstone reservoirs. However, the conventional analysis of the high-pressure mercury intrusion has always focused on the mercury injection curves themselves, neglecting the important geological information conveyed by the mercury ejection curves. This paper quantitatively describes the fractal characteristics of ejection curves by using four fractal models, i.e., Menger model, Thermodynamic model, Sierpinski model, and multi-fractal model. In comparison with mercury injection curves, we explore the fractal significance of mercury ejection curves and define the applicability of different fractal models in characterizing pore architectures. Investigated tight sandstone samples can be divided into four types (Types A, B, C and D) based on porosity, permeability, and mercury removal efficiency. Type D samples are unique in that they have higher permeability (>0.6 mD) but lower mercury removal efficiency (<35%). Fractal studies of the mercury injection curve show that it mainly reflects the pore throat characteristics, while the mercury ejection curve serves to reveal the pore features, and porosity and permeability correlate well with the fractal dimension of the injection curve, while mercury removal efficiency correlates only with the Ds' value of the ejection curve. The studies on the mercury ejection curves also reveal that the small pores and micropores of the Type C and Type D samples are more developed, with varying pore architecture. The fractal dimension DS’ value of Type D samples is greater than that of Type C samples, and the dissolution of Type D samples is more intense than that of Type C samples, which further indicates that the Type D samples are smaller in pore size, rougher in surface, and with greater difficulty for the hydrocarbon to enter, resulting in their reservoir capacity probably less than that of Type C samples. In this regard, the important information characterized by the mercury ejection curve should be considered in evaluating the tight sandstone reservoirs. Finally, the Menger and Thermodynamic models prove to be more suitable for describing the total pore architecture, while the Sierpinski model is better for characterizing the variability of the interconnected pores.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Energy Geoscience
Article number: 100360

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhao H, Chang X, Ge T, et al. Application of fractal model in the Jurassic tight sandstone reservoirs of central Junggar Basin as constrained by mercury ejection curves. Energy Geoscience, 2025, 6(1): 100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2024.100360

640

Views

7

Downloads

7

Crossref

7

Web of Science

7

Scopus

Received: 10 August 2024
Revised: 30 September 2024
Accepted: 11 November 2024
Published: 07 August 2025
© 2024 Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute Corporation, SINOPEC.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).