AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Breaking the geometry-performance tradeoff in compressor deviation modeling: Nested principal component analysis

Mingzhi LIaXianjun YUa,b( )Dejun MENGcGuangfeng ANa,bBaojie LIUa,b
Research Institute of Aero-Engine, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
National Key Laboratory of Science & Technology on Aero-Engine Aero-Thermodynamics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
AECC Shenyang Engine Research Institute, Shenyang 110015, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Uncertainties in the aerodynamic performance of compressors, introduced by manufacturing variations, have received more and more attentions in recent years. The deviation model plays a crucial role in evaluating this uncertainty and facilitating robust design. However, current deviation models with a few variables cannot simultaneously achieve a precise geometric approximation of deviation and provide an accurate assessment of performance uncertainty. This paper introduces a novel deviation modeling method named Nested Principal Component Analysis (NPCA) to break this tradeoff. In this method, both geometry-based and performance-based modes are utilized to describe manufacturing variations. By considering aerodynamic sensitivity, surface deformations that significantly impact aerodynamic performance can be extracted for deviation modeling. To demonstrate the superiority of this newly proposed method, ninety-eight newly manufactured compressor rotor blades were measured using a coordinate measurement machine, and both NPCA and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were employed to model the real manufacturing variations. The results indicate that, in comparison to the PCA method, the NPCA method achieves an equivalent level of accuracy in geometric reconstruction and evaluation of mean performance. Furthermore, the same level of accuracy can be obtained with eight NPCA modes and fifty PCA modes when assessing the scatter in aerodynamic performance. Finally, the working mechanism of the NPCA method for accurate uncertainty quantification was further investigated.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 131-149

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LI M, YU X, MENG D, et al. Breaking the geometry-performance tradeoff in compressor deviation modeling: Nested principal component analysis. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(9): 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.06.012

660

Views

5

Crossref

4

Web of Science

4

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 10 October 2023
Revised: 01 November 2023
Accepted: 18 December 2023
Published: 19 June 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).