AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Research | Open Access

How circular economy can reduce scope 3 carbon footprints: Lessons learned from FIFA world cup Qatar 2022

Hana Yousef Al SholiaTadesse WakjirabAdeeb A. KuttyaSehrish HabibcMuna AlfadhliaBajeela AejasdMurat KucukvaraNuri C. Onatb( )Doyoon Kime
Industrial and Systems Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Qatar Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Computer Science and Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Diriyah Gate Development Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Show Author Information

Abstract

Mega sporting events (MSEs) such as the FIFA World Cup and the Olympics always attract people around the world to visit the hosting country, boosting its tourism and business, and leaving a positive legacy. However, such events also leave significant negative impacts on the environment such as an increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the host and neighboring countries. Considerable research efforts have been devoted to reducing such negative impacts and maintaining the sustainability of infrastructure associated with MSEs. The infrastructure construction in the host country of an MSE is the main and inevitable source of GHG emissions. In particular, the construction work of stadiums. This study presents comprehensive research on scope-based carbon footprint analysis related to two phases, i.e., the construction phase and operation phase of stadiums, by taking the eight world cup stadiums in Qatar as a case study. A life cycle assessment is used to quantify the potential environmental impacts of these stadiums at different stages. The Ecoinvent database is used to quantify the emission factor at each phase. According to the findings, Scope 3 (indirect supply chain) emissions are greater than Scope 1 (direct on-site) emissions, and the construction supply chain is found to be a significant contributor to the carbon footprint of the stadiums, accounting for 98% of the total GHG emissions. The results also show that electricity, district cooling, and waste generation are the three top contributors of GHG emissions with 35%, 25%, and 21% emissions, respectively. Moreover, it is vital to implement innovative approaches such as circular design for end-of-life material recycling and reuse of structural components, which can support a transition toward sustainable and carbon-neutral mega events. Thus, this study presents the role of circular economy in achieving carbon-neutral FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022. This research will contribute to enhancing the future benefits of the sustainable construction of infrastructure projects for mega events and help in harmonizing mega event strategies with national circular economy targets.

References

 

Abdella, G. M., Kucukvar, M., Onat, N. C., Al-Yafay, H. M., & Bulak, M. E. (2020). Sustainability assessment and modeling based on supervised machine learning techniques: The case for food consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119661.

 

Al-Hamrani, A., Kim, D., Kucukvar, M., & Onat, N. C. (2021). Circular economy application for a green stadium construction towards sustainable FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87, Article 106543.

 

Al-Obadi, M., Ayad, H., Pokharel, S., & Ayari, M. A. (2022). Perspectives on food waste management: Prevention and social innovations. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 31, 190-208.

 

Al-Thawadi, F. E., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2019). Evaluation of sustainable urban mobility using comparative environmental life cycle assessment: A case study of Qatar. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 1, Article 100003.

 

Aquino, I., & Nawari, N. (2015). Sustainable design strategies for sport stadia. Suburban Sustainability, 3, 3.

 
Association FI de F, 2014. Sustainability report: 2014 FIFA world cup Brazil. Availableat https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/3756a3d1bce5e27a/original/educsd2hgasief3yeoyt-pdf.pdf.
 

Awani, O., El-Maaddawy, T.,& Ismail, N. (2017). Fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix: A promising strengthening technique for concrete structures. Construction and Building Materials, 132, 94-111.

 

Bovea, M. D.,& Powell, J. C. (2016). Developments in life cycle assessment applied to evaluate the environmental performance of construction and demolition wastes. Waste Management, 50, 151-172.

 

Brambilla, G., Lavagna, M., Vasdravellis, G.,& Castiglioni, C. A. (2019). Environmental benefits arising from demountable steel-concrete composite floor systems in buildings. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 133-142.

 

Carpenter, A. C., Gardner, K. H., Fopiano, J., Benson, C. H.,& Edil, T. B. (2007). Life cycle based risk assessment of recycled materials in roadway construction. Waste Management, 27, 1458-1464.

 

Chernushenko, D. (1996). Sports tourism goes sustainable: The Lillehammer experience. Visions in Leisure and Business, 15, 5

 

Colangelo, F., Forcina, A., Farina, I.,& Petrillo, A. (2018). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of different kinds of concrete containing waste for sustainable construction. Buildings, 8, 70.

 

Collins, A., Jones, C.,& Munday, M. (2009). Assessing the environmental impacts of mega sporting events: Two options? Tourism Management, 30, 828-837.

 

Dawoud, M. A. (2012). Environmental impacts of seawater desalination: Arabian Gulf case study. International Journal of Environment and Sustainability, 1, 22-37.

 

Death, C. (2011). “Greening” the 2010 FIFA World Cup: Environmental sustainability and the mega-event in South Africa. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13, 99-117.

 

Dong, L., Liu, Z. W.,& Bian, Y. L. (2021). Match circular economy and urban sustainability: re-investigating circular economy under sustainable development goals (SDGs). Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1, 243-256.

 

Fenner, A. E., Kibert, C. J., Woo, J., Morque, S., Razkenari, M., Hakim, H.,& Lu, X. S. (2018). The carbon footprint of buildings: A review of methodologies and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 1142-1152.

 

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P.,& Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy—a new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768.

 

Goel, V., Sharma, A., Shree, V.,& Nautiyal, H. (2012). Life cycle environmental assessment of an educational building in Northern India: A case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 4, 22-28.

 

Gold, J. R.,& Gold, M. M. (2013). “Bring it under the legacy umbrella”: Olympic host cities and the changing fortunes of the sustainability agenda. Sustainability, 5, 3526-3542.

 
Gold, J. R., & Gold, M. M. (2015). Sustainability, legacy and the 2012 London games. In Routledge handbook of sport and legacy (pp. 142-158). London: Routledge.
 

Guggemos, A. A.,& Horvath, A. (2005). Comparison of environmental effects of steel- and concrete-framed buildings. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 11, 93-101.

 

Holmes, K., Hughes, M., Mair, J., & Carlsen, J. (2015). Events and Sustainability. London: Routledge.

 

Kennedy-Kuiper, R. C. S., Wakjira, T. G.,& Alam, M. S. (2022). Repair and retrofit of RC bridge piers with steel-reinforced grout jackets: An experimental investigation. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 27, Article 04022067.

 

Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J.,& Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96, 118-121.

 
Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
 

Kirchherr, J., Reike, D.,& Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 127, 221-232.

 

Kucukvar, M., Egilmez, G.,& Tatari, O. (2014). Evaluating environmental impacts of alternative construction waste management approaches using supply-chain-linked life-cycle analysis. Waste Management & Research, 32, 500-508.

 

Kucukvar, M., Kutty, A. A., Al-Hamrani, A., Kim, D., Nofal, N., Onat, N. C., Ermolaeva, P., Al-Ansari, T., Al-Thani, S. K., Al-Jurf, N. M., et al. (2021). How circular design can contribute to social sustainability and legacy of the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022TM? The case of innovative shipping container stadium. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 91, Article 106665.

 

Long, X. L., Chen, B.,& Park, B. (2018). Effect of 2008’s Beijing Olympic Games on environmental efficiency of 268 China’s cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1423-1432.

 

López Ruiz, L. A., Roca Ramón, X.,& Gassó Domingo, S. (2020). The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector—a review and an integrative model approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, Article 119238.

 

Merli, R., Preziosi, M.,& Acampora, A. (2018). How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 703-722.

 

Meza Talavera, A., Al-Ghamdi, S.,& Koç, M. (2019). Sustainability in mega-events: Beyond Qatar 2022. Sustainability, 11, 6407.

 

Murtagh, N., Scott, L.,& Fan, J. L. (2020). Sustainable and resilient construction: Current status and future challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122264.

 

Naser, M. Z., Hawileh, R. A.,& Abdalla, J. A. (2019). Fiber-reinforced polymer composites in strengthening reinforced concrete structures: A critical review. Engineering Structures, 198, Article 109542.

 

Onat, N.C., Kucukvar, M., Tatari, O., 2014. Scope-based carbon footprint analysis of U.S. residential and commercial buildings: An input-output hybrid life cycle assessment approach. Building and Environment, 72, 53-62.

 

Ortiz, J. A., de la Fuente, A., Mena Sebastia, F., Segura, I.,& Aguado, A. (2017). Steel-fibre-reinforced self-compacting concrete with 100% recycled mixed aggregates suitable for structural applications. Construction and Building Materials, 156, 230-241.

 

Pérez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, J.,& Pout, C. (2008). A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy and Buildings, 40, 394-398.

 
Ritchie, H., & Rosr, M. (2020). CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions. Our World in Data.
 

Ruuska, A.,& Häkkinen, T. (2014). Material efficiency of building construction. Buildings, 4, 266-294.

 

Searle, G. (2002). Uncertain legacy: Sydney’s Olympic stadiums. European Planning Studies, 10, 845-860.

 

Sehnem, S., Kuzma, E., Julkovsky, D. J., Frare, M. B.,& Vazquez-Brust, D. (2021). Megatrends in circular economy: Avenues for relevant advancements in organizations. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1, 173-208.

 

Shojaei, A., Ketabi, R., Razkenari, M., Hakim, H.,& Wang, J. (2021). Enabling a circular economy in the built environment sector through blockchain technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, Article 126352.

 

Singh, A., Berghorn, G., Joshi, S.,& Syal, M. (2011). Review of life-cycle assessment applications in building construction. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 17, 15-23.

 

Spanos, I., Kucukvar, M., Bell, T. C., Elnimah, A., Hamdan, H., Al Meer, B., Prakash, S., Lundberg, O., Kutty, A. A.,& AlKhereibi, A. H. A. (2022). How FIFA World Cup 2022TM can meet the carbon neutral commitments and the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development? : Reflections from the tree nursery project in Qatar. Sustainable Development, 30, 203-226.

 
Stahl, H., Hochfeld, C., Schmied, M., 2006. Green goal legacy report. Available at https://www.oeko.de/oekodoc/292/2006-011-en.pdf.
 

Teng, J. G., Yu, T.,& Fernando, D. (2012). Strengthening of steel structures with fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 78, 131-143.

 

Toboso-Chavero, S., Nadal, A., Petit-Boix, A., Pons, O., Villalba, G., Gabarrell, X., Josa, A.,& Rieradevall, J. (2019). Towards productive cities: Environmental assessment of the food-energy-water nexus of the urban roof mosaic. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23, 767-780.

 

Trendafilova, S., Graham, J.,& Bemiller, J. (2017). Sustainability and the Olympics: The case of the 2016 Rio summer games. Journal of Sustainability Education, 16, 1-22.

 

Tziralis, G., Tolis, A., Tatsiopoulos, I.,& Aravossis, K. (2008). Sustainability and the Olympics: The case of Athens 2004. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 3, 132-146.

 
UNEP, S., 2009. Common carbon metric for measuring energy use and reporting greenhouse gas emissions from building operations. United Nations Environment Programme, Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative, Paris. Available at https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/7922.
 

Upadhyay, A., Mukhuty, S., Kumar, V.,& Kazancoglu, Y. (2021). Blockchain technology and the circular economy: Implications for sustainability and social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, Article 126130.

 
Vanderweil, P. (2008). Greening stadiums: Study of environmentally responsible methods of building and retro-fitting stadiums. Cambridge, MA, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Ph.D. Dissertation.
 

Wakjira, T. G.,& Ebead, U. (2019). Experimental and analytical study on strengthening of reinforced concrete T-beams in shear using steel reinforced grout (SRG). Composites Part B: Engineering, 177, Article 107368.

 

Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Kalibatas, D.,& Kalibatiene, D. (2017). Achieving nearly zero-energy buildings by applying multi-attribute assessment. Energy and Buildings, 143, 162-172.

Circular Economy
Article number: 100026
Cite this article:
Al Sholi HY, Wakjira T, Kutty AA, et al. How circular economy can reduce scope 3 carbon footprints: Lessons learned from FIFA world cup Qatar 2022. Circular Economy, 2023, 2(1): 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2023.100026

821

Views

3

Crossref

6

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 09 October 2022
Revised: 31 December 2022
Accepted: 12 January 2023
Published: 23 February 2023
© 2023 The Author(s).

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return