AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Avian Research Article
PDF (2 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Effect of parasite egg size and quantity contrast of parasite-host eggs on recognition and rejection mode of Green-backed Tits

Xu Zhaoa, Ping Yeb, Huaxiao Zhoua, Canchao Yanga( )
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, 571158, China
Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637009, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In the co-evolutionary system of avian brood parasitism, egg recognition and rejection are common and generally act as effective anti-parasitic adaptations by hosts. Accordingly, most studies have examined the role of parasite egg colors and markings in detection cues in hosts; however, studies focusing on the effects of egg size and quantity are relatively scarce and have mostly concentrated on the hosts of parasitic cowbirds. Here, we studied the egg recognition behaviors of a potential host of the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus)—the Green-backed Tit (Parus monticolus), to determine: (1) whether the host uses the sizes of parasite eggs and/or the quantity contrast between parasite and host eggs as cues for recognition, (2) whether the host employs the template or discordant recognition mechanism for egg recognition, and (3) whether the size and quantity of parasite eggs affect the egg rejection modes of the hosts. The results indicate that Green-backed Tits did not use parasite egg size as a primary cue for egg recognition. We hypothesized that both visual and tactile detection might be involved in egg recognition by Green-backed Tits and suggest further studies after controlling for nest light conditions. Differences in egg quantity between parasites and hosts were not used as cues for egg recognition because the hosts employed the template mechanism rather than discordance to recognize parasite eggs. However, both the relative sizes and quantity of parasite and host eggs significantly affected the rejection modes of parasite eggs, and larger or more parasite eggs triggered higher probabilities of nest desertion in hosts.

Keywords

Avian brood parasitismCoevolutionDiscordancy mechanismRecognition cueTemplate mechanism

References

 

Abernathy, V.E., Peer, B.D., 2015. Mechanisms of egg recognition in brown-headed cowbird hosts: the role of ultraviolet reflectance. Anim. Behav. 109, 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.08.006.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Antonov, A., Stokke, B.G., Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E., 2006. Egg rejection in marsh warblers (Acrocephalus palustris) heavily parasitized by common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). Auk 123, 419-430. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/123.2.419.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Antonov, A., Stokke, B.G., Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E., 2009. Evidence for egg discrimination preceding failed rejection attempts in a small cuckoo host. Biol. Lett. 5, 169-171. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0645.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Avilés, J.M., Vikan, J.R., Fossøy, F., Antonov, A., Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E., et al., 2010. Avian colour perception predicts behavioural responses to experimental brood parasitism in chaffinches. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01898.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Begum, S., Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E., Stokke, B.G., 2012. Responses of potential hosts of asian cuckoos to experimental parasitism. Ibis 154, 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2012.01213.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Bortolato, T., Gloag, R., Reboreda, J.C., Fiorini, V.D., 2019. Size matters: shiny cowbirds secure more food than host nestmates thanks to their larger size, not signal exaggeration. Anim. Behav. 157, 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.09.009.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Dainson, M., Hauber, M.E., López, A.V., Grim, T., Hanley, D., 2017. Does contrast between eggshell ground and spot coloration affect egg rejection? Sci. Nat. 104, 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-017-1476-2.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Davies, N.B., 2000. Cuckoos, Cowbirds and Other Cheats. T & AD Poyser, London.
 

Davies, N.B., 2011. Cuckoo adaptations: trickery and tuning. J. Zool. 284, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00810.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Davies, N.B., Brooke, M.D.L., 1989. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. J. Anim. Ecol. 58, 207-224. https://doi.org/10.2307/4995.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Grim, T., Samašš, P., Procházka, P., Rutila, J., 2014. Are tits really unsuitable hosts for the common cuckoo? Ornis Fenn. 91, 166-177. https://doi.org/10.51812/of.133853.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Guigueno, M.F., Sealy, S.G., 2010. Clutch abandonment by parasitized yellow warblers: egg burial or nest desertion? Condor 112, 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2010.090135.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Guigueno, M.F., Sealy, S.G., 2012. Nest sanitation in passerine birds: implications for egg rejection in hosts of brood parasites. J. Ornithol. 153, 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-011-0731-0.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Guigueno, M.F., Sealy, S.G., Westphal, A.M., 2014. Rejection of parasitic eggs in passerine hosts: size matters more for a non-ejecter. Auk 131, 583-594. https://doi.org/10.1642/AUK-14-36.1.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Hanley, D., Grim, T., Igic, B., Samaš, P., López, A.V., Shawkey, M.D., et al., 2017. Egg discrimination along a gradient of natural variation in eggshell coloration. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20162592. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2592.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Honza, M., Polačiková, L., 2008. Experimental reduction of ultraviolet wavelengths reflected from parasitic eggs affects rejection behaviour in the blackcap sylvia atricapilla. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 2519-2523. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.017327.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Hosoi, S.A., Rothstein, S.I., 2000. Nest desertion and cowbird parasitism: evidence for evolved responses and evolutionary lag. Anim. Behav. 59, 823-840. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1370.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Kilner, R.M., 2006. The evolution of egg colour and patterning in birds. Biol. Rev. 81, 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793106007044.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Lahti, D.C., 2006. Persistence of egg recognition in the absence of cuckoo brood parasitism: pattern and mechanism. Evolution 60, 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01090.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Lang, A.K., Bollinger, E.K., Peer, B.D., 2014. Effect of parasite-to-host egg ratio on egg rejection by a brown-headed bowbird host. Auk 131, 694-701. https://doi.org/10.1642/AUK-14-28.1.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Liu, J., Zhang, F., Liu, Y., Liang, W., 2023. Egg recognition and nestling discrimination in the crested myna (Acridotheres cristatellus): size matters. Avian Res. 14, 100111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100111.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Lotem, A., Nakamura, H., Zahavi, A., 1992. Rejection of cuckoo eggs in relation to host age: a possible evolutionary equilibrium. Behav. Ecol. 3, 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/3.2.128.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Lotem, A., Nakamura, H., Zahavi, A., 1995. Constraints on egg discrimination and cuckoo-host co-evolution. Anim. Behav. 49, 1185-1209. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1995.0152.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Luro, A.B., Igic, B., Croston, R., López, A.V., Shawkey, M.D., Hauber, M.E., 2018. Which egg features predict egg rejection responses in American robins? Replicating Rothstein’s (1982) study. Ecol. Evol. 8, 1673-1679. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3759.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Lyon, B., 2007. Mechanism of egg recognition in defenses against conspecific brood parasitism: American coots (Fulica americana) know their own eggs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 455-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0273-2.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Marchetti, K., 2000. Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Anim. Behav. 59, 877-883. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1388.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Martín-Vivaldi, M., Soler, M., Møller, A.P., 2002. Unrealistically high costs of rejecting artificial model eggs in cuckoo Cuculus canorus hosts. J. Avian Biol. 33, 295-301. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-048X.2002.330311.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Mason, P., Rothstein, S.I., 1986. Coevolution and avian brood parasitism: cowbird eggs show evolutionary response to host discrimination. Evolution 40, 1207-1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb05745.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Meshcheryagina, S.G., Bachurin, G.N., Bourski, O.V., Golovatin, M.G., 2020. Egg size as the main stimulus to discriminatory behavior of the yellow-browed warbler (Phylloscopus inornatus, Phylloscopidae) under brood parasitism of the oriental cuckoo (Cuculus optatus, Cuculidae). Biol. Bull. 47, 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359020070109.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E., Braa, A.T., 1991. Rejection behavior by common cuckoo hosts towards artificial brood parasite eggs. Auk 108, 348-354. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/108.2.348.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Moskát, C., Bán, M., Székely, T., Komdeur, J., Lucassen, R.W.G., van Boheemen, L.A., et al., 2010. Discordancy or template-based recognition? Dissecting the cognitive basis of the rejection of foreign eggs in hosts of avian brood parasites. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 1976-1983. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.040394.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Moskát, C., Hauber, M.E., 2007. Conflict between egg recognition and egg rejection decisions in common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts. Anim. Cognit. 10, 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0071-x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Payne, R.B., 2005. The Cuckoos. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Crossref
 

Perrins, C.M., 1965. Population fluctuations and clutch-size in the great tit, Parus major. J. Anim. Ecol. 34, 601-647. https://doi.org/10.2307/2453.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Roncalli, G., Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D., Soler, M., 2017. Size and material of model parasitic eggs affect the rejection response of western Bonelli’s warbler Phylloscopus bonelli. Ibis 159, 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12431.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Rothstein, S.I., 1974. Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: possible learned and innate factors. Auk 91, 796-807. https://doi.org/10.2307/4084731.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Rothstein, S.I., 1975. Mechanisms of avian egg-recognition: do birds know their own eggs? Anim. Behav. 23, 268-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(75)90075-5.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Rothstein, S.I., 1978. Mechanisms of avian egg-recognition: additional evidence for learned components. Anim. Behav. 26, 671-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(78)90133-1.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Sadam, A., 2022. Breeding ecology and anti-brood parasitism strategy of the Common Myna in Pakistan. Doctoral Thesis. Hainan Normal University,. Haikou.
 

Samaš, P., Hauber, M.E., Honza, M., 2021. A meta-analysis of avian egg traits cueing egg-rejection defenses against brood parasitism. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 703208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.703208.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Soler, M., 2014. Long-term coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Biol. Rev. 89, 688-704. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12075.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Soler, M., 2017. Avian Brood Parasitism Behaviour, Ecology, Evolution and Coevolution. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Crossref
 

Soler, M., Martinez, J.G., Soler, J.J., Møller, A.P., 1995. Preferential allocation of food by magpies Pica pica to great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius chicks. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37, 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173893.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Spottiswoode, C.N., Stevens, M., 2010. Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8672-8676. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910486107.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Stevens, M., Troscianko, J., Spottiswoode, C.N., 2013. Repeated targeting of the same hosts by a brood parasite compromises host egg rejection. Nat. Commun. 4, 2475. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3475.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Stoddard, M.C., Stevens, M., 2011. Avian vision and the evolution of egg color mimicry in the common cuckoo. Evolution 65, 2004-2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01262.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Stokke, B.G., Takasu, F., Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E., 2007. The importance of clutch characteristics and learning for antiparasitic adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasites. Evolution 61, 2212-2228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00176.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Šulc, M., Procházka, P., Capek, M., Honza, M., 2015. Birds use eggshell UV reflectance when recognizing non-mimetic parasitic eggs. Behav. Ecol. 27, 677-684. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv206.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Tinbergen, N., 1951. The Study of Instinct. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
 

Tosi-Germán, R.A., Tassino, B., Reboreda, J.C., 2020. Female and male rufous horneros eject shiny cowbird eggs using a mental template of the size of their own eggs. Behav. Process. 178, 104152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104152.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Trivers, R.L., 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell, B.G. (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Routledge, New York, pp. 136–179.
Crossref
 

Underwood, T.J., Sealy, S.G., 2006. Grasp-ejection in two small ejecters of cowbird eggs: a test of bill-size constraints and the evolutionary equilibrium hypothesis. Anim. Behav. 71, 409-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.004.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Underwood, T.J., Sealy, S.G., 2006. Influence of shape on egg discrimination in American robins and gray catbirds. Ethology 112, 164-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01143.x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Vidya, T.N.C., 2018. Supernormal stimuli and responses. Resonance 23, 853-860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-018-0688-x.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Wang, L., Yang, C., Møller, A.P., Liang, W., Lu, X., 2015. Multiple mechanisms of egg recognition in a cuckoo host. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 69, 1761-1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1988-8.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Yang, C., Cai, Y., Liang, W., Antonov, A., 2011. Breeding biology of the golden parrotbill (Paradoxornis verreauxi) (Aves: Timaliidae) in southwestern China. J. Nat. Hist. 45, 1817-1822. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.560969.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Yang, C., Liang, W., Antonov, A., Cai, Y., Stokke, B.G., Fossøy, F., et al., 2012. Diversity of parasitic cuckoos and their hosts in China. Chinese Birds 3, 9-32. https://doi.org/10.5122/cbirds.2012.0004.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Yang, C., Liang, W., Cai, Y., Shi, S., Takasu, F., Moller, A.P., et al., 2010. Coevolution in action: disruptive selection on egg colour in an avian brood parasite and its host. PLoS One 5, e10816. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010816.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Yang, C., Liang, W., Møller, A.P., 2019. Egg retrieval versus egg rejection in cuckoo hosts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 374, 20180200. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0200.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Yang, C., Liu, Y., Zeng, L., Liang, W., 2014. Egg color variation, but not egg rejection behavior, changes in a cuckoo host breeding in the absence of brood parasitism. Ecol. Evol. 4, 2239-2246. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1096.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Yang, C., Møller, A.P., Liang, W., 2022. Light matters: nest illumination alters egg rejection behavior in a cavity-nesting bird. Avian Res. 13, 100016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100016.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Yang, C., Møller, A.P., Røskaft, E., Moksnes, A., Liang, W., Stokke, B.G., 2014. Reject the odd egg: egg recognition mechanisms in parrotbills. Behav. Ecol. 25, 1320-1324. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru124.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Yang, C., Wang, H., Luo, K., Liu, J., Yu, J., Wang, H., et al., 2024. How does evolution against brood parasites reshape or modify an instinctive behaviour in birds? Anim. Behav. 210, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.01.002.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Yang, C., Wang, L., Hsu, Y.-C., Antonov, A., Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E., et al., 2013. UV reflectance as a cue in egg discrimination in two prinia species exploited differently by brood parasites in Taiwan. Ibis 155, 571-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12043.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ye, P., Cai, Y., Bi, J., Yao, X., Li, G., Yang, C., 2022. Parasite egg recognition based on multicomponent cues by green-backed tits (Parus monticolus). Avian Biol. Res. 15, 53-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/17581559211066092.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ye, P., Cai, Y., Wu, N., Yao, X., Li, G., Liang, W., et al., 2022. Egg rejection based on egg size recognition as a specific strategy against parasitic cuckoos. Curr. Zool. 69, 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoac037.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ye, P., Yang, C., Liang, W., 2019. Nest site availability and niche differentiation between two cavity-nesting birds in time and space. Ecol. Evol. 9, 11904-11910. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5698.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Zölei, A., Hauber, M.E., Geltsch, N., Moskát, C., 2012. Asymmetrical signal content of egg shape as predictor of egg rejection by great reed warblers, hosts of the common cuckoo. Behaviour 149, 391-406. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23211306.
Crossref Google Scholar
Avian Research
Volume 15 Issue 4,
December 2024
Article number: 100216
DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2024.100216

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Cite this Report
Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhao X, Ye P, Zhou H, et al. Effect of parasite egg size and quantity contrast of parasite-host eggs on recognition and rejection mode of Green-backed Tits. Avian Research, 2024, 15(4): 100216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2024.100216

128

Views

7

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 15 July 2024
Revised: 16 November 2024
Accepted: 17 November 2024
Published: 19 November 2024
© 2024 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).