AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Avian Research Article
PDF (2.7 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Most bird species remain poorly studied but threated status promotes research effort

Hanchen Shuai, Juntao Hu, Shilu Zheng, Zhijun Ma, Jiajia Liu( )
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

To halt biodiversity loss, threatened species are often selected as targets for conservation actions. However, whether most threatened species receive sufficient research effort remains unknown. Low research and public attention of threatened species would hinder the implementation of effective conservation actions. Therefore, it is urgent to assess both research effort and species extinction risk simultaneously to provide critical information for targeted conservation practices. Here, we evaluated research effort of extant bird species worldwide (n = 10,904) by searching the number of all publications and those focused on conservation in Scopus database for each species, and investigated key determinants of research effort. We found that although the median value of publications of threatened species was significantly higher than that of non-threatened species, 47.4% of threatened species had less than 3 publications, and 73.8% had less than 10 publications, indicating low research effort of most threatened species. Although research effort was positively related to extinction risk, research effort was mainly associated with human-related variables, with birds described earlier and occurred in developed regions receiving higher research effort. In comparison, extinction risk was mainly associated with biological attributes, with large-sized and narrow-distributed species being more likely to be threatened. Our finding suggests that research effort of species can provide complementary information for current conservation strategies designed for threatened species, and we urge that many recently discovered and narrowly distributed species in less developed regions require more research and conservation attention.

Keywords

BirdExtinction riskGlobalResearch effortTargeted conservation action

References

 

Adamo, M., Chialva, M., Calevo, J., Bertoni, F., Mammola, S., 2021. Plant scientists' research attention is skewed towards colourful, conspicuous and broadly distributed flowers. Nat. Plants 7, 574-578.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Albert, C., Luque, G.M., Courchamp, F., 2018. The twenty most charismatic species. PLoS One 13, e0199149.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Amano, T., Berdejo-Espinola, V., Christie, A.P., Willott, K., Akasaka, M., Báldi, A., et al., 2021. Tapping into non-English-language science for the conservation of global biodiversity. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001296.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ballouard, J.-M., Brischoux, F., Bonnet, X., 2011. Children prioritize virtual exotic biodiversity over local biodiversity. PLoS One 6, e23152.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Barrowclough, G.F., Cracraft, J., Klicka, J., Zink, R.M., 2016. How many kinds of birds are there and why does it matter? PLoS One 11, e0166307.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Bartoń, K., 2024. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.48.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn.
 

Berti, E., Monsarrat, S., Munk, M., Jarvie, S., Svenning, J.-C., 2020. Body size is a good proxy for vertebrate charisma. Biol. Conserv. 251, 108790.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Bickley, M.S., Kousha, K., Thelwall, M., 2020. Can the impact of grey literature be assessed? An investigation of UK government publications cited by articles and books. Scientometrics 125, 1425-1444.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
BirdLife International, 2020. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLifeInternational Digital Checklist of the Birds of the World, Version 5.0. . (Accessed 18June 2021).
 

Böhm, M., Williams, R., Bramhall, H.R., McMillan, K.M., Davidson, A.D., Garcia, A., et al., 2016. Correlates of extinction risk in squamate reptiles: the relative importance of biology, geography, threat and range size. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 391-405.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Bolam, F.C., Mair, L., Angelico, M., Brooks, T.M., Burgman, M., Hermes, C., et al., 2021. How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented? Conserv. Lett. 14, e12762.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Brito, D., Oprea, M., 2009. Mismatch of research effort and threat in avian conservation biology. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 2, 353-362.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Brooks, M.E., Kristensen, K., Van Benthem, K.J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C.W., Nielsen, A., et al., 2017. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J 9, 378-400.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Buechley, E.R., Santangeli, A., Girardello, M., Neate-Clegg, M.H.C., Oleyar, D., McClure, C.J.W., et al., 2019. Global raptor research and conservation priorities: tropical raptors fall prey to knowledge gaps. Divers. Distrib. 25, 856-869.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Cadena, C.D., Cuervo, A.M., Céspedes, L.N., Bravo, G.A., Krabbe, N., Schulenberg, T.S., et al., 2020. Systematics, biogeography, and diversification of Scytalopus tapaculos (Rhinocryptidae), an enigmatic radiation of Neotropical montane birds. Auk 137, ukz077.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Callaghan, C.T., Nakagawa, S., Cornwell, W.K., 2021. Global abundance estimates for 9, 700 bird species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023170118.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P.R., 2009. Discoveries of new mammal species and their implications for conservation and ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3841-3846.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Chichorro, F., Juslén, A., Cardoso, P., 2019. A review of the relation between species traits and extinction risk. Biol. Conserv. 237, 220-229.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Clark, J.A., May, R.M., 2002. Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science 297, 191-192.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Corlett, R.T., 2011. Trouble with the gray literature. Biotropica 43, 3-5.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Courchamp, F., Jaric, I., Albert, C., Meinard, Y., Ripple, W.J., Chapron, G., 2018. The paradoxical extinction of the most charismatic animals. PLoS Biol. 16, e2003997.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Davies, T., Cowley, A., Bennie, J., Leyshon, C., Inger, R., Carter, H., et al., 2018. Popular interest in vertebrates does not reflect extinction risk and is associated with bias in conservation investment. PLoS One 13, e0203694.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

de Lima, R.F., Bird, J.P., Barlow, J., 2011. Research effort allocation and the conservation of restricted-range island bird species. Biol. Conserv. 144, 627-632.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Devenish-Nelson, E.S., Weidemann, D., Townsend, J., Nelson, H.P., 2019. Patterns in island endemic forest-dependent bird research: the Caribbean as a case-study. Biodivers. Conserv. 28, 1885-1904.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ducatez, S., Lefebvre, L., 2014. Patterns of research effort in birds. PLoS One 9, e89955.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ducatez, S., Sol, D., Sayol, F., Lefebvre, L., 2020. Behavioural plasticity is associated with reduced extinction risk in birds. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 788-793.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ducatez, S., Tingley, R., Shine, R., 2014. Using species co‐occurrence patterns to quantify relative habitat breadth in terrestrial vertebrates. Ecosphere 5, 152.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Dunn, O.J., 1964. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6, 241-252.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Fromm, A., Meiri, S., 2021. Big, flightless, insular and dead: characterising the extinct birds of the Quaternary. J. Biogeogr. 48, 2350-2359.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Fukano, Y., Tanaka, Y., Soga, M., 2020. Zoos and animated animals increase public interest in and support for threatened animals. Sci. Total Environ. 704, 135352.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Fuller, R.J., Smith, K.W., Grice, P.V., Currie, F.A., Quine, C.P., 2007. Habitat change and woodland birds in Britain: implications for management and future research. Ibis 149, 261-268.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Guedes, J.J., Moura, M.R., Diniz‐Filho, J.A.F., 2023. Species out of sight: elucidating the determinants of research effort in global reptiles. Ecography 2023, e06491.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Haddaway, N.R., 2015. The use of web-scraping software in searching for grey literature. Grey J. 11, 186-190.
Google Scholar
 

Haddaway, N.R., Bayliss, H.R., 2015. Shades of grey: two forms of grey literature important for reviews in conservation. Biol. Conserv. 191, 827-829.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Harris, G., Pimm, S.L., 2008. Range size and extinction risk in forest birds. Conserv. Biol. 22, 163-171.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D., Rubio, E., Bitrus Zira, K., 2017. The degree of urbanization of a species affects how intensively it is studied: a global perspective. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5, 41.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
IUCN, 2021. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-1. (Accessed 19October 2021).
 

Jarić, I., Roll, U., Bonaiuto, M., Brook, B.W., Courchamp, F., Firth, J.A., et al., 2022. Societal extinction of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 411-419.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Jetz, W., Thomas, G.H., Joy, J.B., Redding, D.W., Hartmann, K., Mooers, A.O., 2014. Global distribution and conservation of evolutionary distinctness in birds. Curr. Biol. 24, 919-930.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Kim, J.H., Park, S., Kim, S.H., Lee, E.J., 2021. Identifying high-priority conservation areas for endangered waterbirds using a flagship species in the Korean DMZ. Ecol. Eng. 159, 106080.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Kruskal, W.H., Wallis, W.A., 1952. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47, 583-621.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Lindenmayer, D., Scheele, B., 2017. Do not publish. Science 356, 800-801.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Liu, J., Jin, X., Yao, S., Wang, Y., Lu, Y., Chen, Q., et al., 2023. Who will name new plant species? Temporal change in the origins of taxonomists in China. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 290, 20221954.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Liu, J., Slik, F., Zheng, S., Lindenmayer, D.B., 2022. Undescribed species have higher extinction risk than known species. Conserv. Lett. 15, e12876.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Mace, G.M., Collar, N.J., Gaston, K.J., Hilton‐Taylor, C., Akçakaya, H.R., Leader‐Williams, N., et al., 2008. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1424-1442.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Mahood, Q., Van Eerd, D., Irvin, E., 2014. Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits. Res. Synth. Method. 5, 221-234.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Marshall, B.M., Strine, C., Hughes, A.C., 2020. Thousands of reptile species threatened by under-regulated global trade. Nat. Commun. 11, 4738.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Mashayekhi, M., MacPherson, B., Gras, R., 2014. A machine learning approach to investigate the reasons behind species extinction. Ecol. Inform. 20, 58-66.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

McKenzie, A.J., Robertson, P.A., 2015. Which species are we researching and why? A case study of the ecology of British breeding birds. PLoS One 10, e0131004.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Miralles, A., Raymond, M., Lecointre, G., 2019. Empathy and compassion toward other species decrease with evolutionary divergence time. Sci. Rep. 9, 19555.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., 2016. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics 106, 213-228.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Murray, H.J., Green, E.J., Williams, D.R., Burfield, I.J., Brooke, M.D., 2015. Is research effort associated with the conservation status of European bird species? Endang. Species Res. 27, 193-206.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Muschelli, J., 2019. Rscopus: Scopus database 'API' interface. R package version 0.6.6.https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rscopus.
 

Pimm, S.L., Jenkins, C.N., Abell, R., Brooks, T.M., Gittleman, J.L., Joppa, L.N., et al., 2014. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344, 1246752.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Pimm, S.L., Jones, H.L., Diamond, J., 1988. On the risk of extinction. Am. Nat. 132, 757-785.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
R Core Team, 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. RFoundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
 

Roberge, J.-M., 2014. Using data from online social networks in conservation science: which species engage people the most on Twitter? Biodivers. Conserv. 23, 715-726.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Santangeli, A., Haukka, A., Morris, W., Arkkila, S., Delhey, K., Kempenaers, B., et al., 2023. What drives our aesthetic attraction to birds? NPJ Biodivers 2, 20.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Santos, J.W.D., Correia, R.A., Malhado, A.C.M., Campos‐Silva, J.V., Teles, D., Jepson, P., et al., 2020. Drivers of taxonomic bias in conservation research: a global analysis of terrestrial mammals. Anim. Conserv. 23, 679-688.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Scheffers, B.R., Joppa, L.N., Pimm, S.L., Laurance, W.F., 2012. What we know and don't know about Earth's missing biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 501-510.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Scott, J.M., Goble, D.D., Haines, A.M., Wiens, J.A., Neel, M.C., 2010. Conservation‐reliant species and the future of conservation. Conserv. Lett. 3, 91-97.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Sitas, N., Baillie, J., Isaac, N., 2009. What are we saving? Developing a standardized approach for conservation action. Anim. Conserv. 12, 231-237.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Smith, R.J., Veríssimo, D., Isaac, N.J., Jones, K.E., 2012. Identifying Cinderella species: uncovering mammals with conservation flagship appeal. Conserv. Lett. 5, 205-212.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Stoudt, S., Goldstein, B.R., de Valpine, P., 2022. Identifying engaging bird species and traits with community science observations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2110156119.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Sutherland, W.J., Pullin, A.S., Dolman, P.M., Knight, T.M., 2004. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 305-308.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Tam, J., Lagisz, M., Cornwell, W., Nakagawa, S., 2022. Quantifying research interests in 7, 521 mammalian species with h-index: a case study. GigaScience 11, giac074.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Tilman, D., Clark, M., Williams, D.R., Kimmel, K., Polasky, S., Packer, C., 2017. Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention. Nature 546, 73-81.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Tobias, J.A., Sheard, C., Pigot, A.L., Devenish, A.J., Yang, J., Sayol, F., et al., 2022. AVONET: morphological, ecological and geographical data for all birds. Ecol. Lett. 25, 581-597.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Trimble, M.J., van Aarde, R.J., 2010. Species inequality in scientific study. Conserv. Biol. 24, 886-890.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Troudet, J., Grandcolas, P., Blin, A., Vignes-Lebbe, R., Legendre, F., 2017. Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences. Sci. Rep. 7, 9132.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Wang, Z.-N., Yang, L., Fan, P.-F., Zhang, L., 2021. Species bias and spillover effects in scientific research on Carnivora in China. Zool. Res. 42, 354-361.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Wilcoxon, F., 1992. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. In: Kotz, S., Johnson, A.L. (Eds.), Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution. Springer, Berlin, pp. 196–202.
Crossref
 

Winkler, H., Kotaka, N., Gamauf, A., Nittinger, F., Haring, E., 2005. On the phylogenetic position of the Okinawa woodpecker (Sapheopipo noguchii). J. Ornithol. 146, 103-110.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Xu, W., Viña, A., Kong, L., Pimm, S.L., Zhang, J., Yang, W., et al., 2017. Reassessing the conservation status of the giant panda using remote sensing. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1635-1638.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Zhang, L., Yang, L., Chapman, C.A., Peres, C.A., Lee, T.M., Fan, P.-F., 2023. Growing disparity in global conservation research capacity and its impact on biodiversity conservation. One Earth 6, 147-157.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Zhang, W., Goodale, E., Chen, J., 2014. How contact with nature affects children's biophilia, biophobia and conservation attitude in China. Biol. Conserv. 177, 109-116.
Crossref Google Scholar
Avian Research
Volume 15 Issue 4,
December 2024
Article number: 100215
DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2024.100215

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Cite this Report
Close
Close
Cite this article:
Shuai H, Hu J, Zheng S, et al. Most bird species remain poorly studied but threated status promotes research effort. Avian Research, 2024, 15(4): 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2024.100215

137

Views

5

Downloads

1

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 17 June 2024
Revised: 20 September 2024
Accepted: 07 November 2024
Published: 15 November 2024
© 2024 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).