Journal Home > Volume 6 , Issue 3

Trajectory corrections for lunar flyby transfers to Sun--Earth/Moon libration point orbits (LPOs) with continuous thrusts are investigated using an ephemeris model. The lunar flyby transfer has special geometrical and dynamical structures; therefore, its trajectory correction strategy is considerably different from that of previous studies and should be specifically designed. In this paper, we first propose a control strategy based on the backstepping technique with a dead-band scheme using an ephemeris model. The initial error caused by the launch time error is considered. Since the perturbed transfers significantly diverge from the reference transfers after the spacecraft passes by the Moon, we adopt two sets of control parameters in two portions before and after the lunar flyby, respectively. Subsequently, practical constraints owing to the navigation and propellant systems are introduced in the dynamical model of the trajectory correction. Using a prograde type 2 orbit as an example, numerical simulations show that our control strategy can efficiently address trajectory corrections for lunar flyby transfers with different practical constraints. In addition, we analyze the effects of the navigation intervals and dead-band scheme on trajectory corrections. Finally, trajectory corrections for different lunar flyby transfers are depicted and compared.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Trajectory correction for lunar flyby transfers to libration point orbits using continuous thrust

Show Author's information Yi Qi1Anton de Ruiter2( )
School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada

Abstract

Trajectory corrections for lunar flyby transfers to Sun--Earth/Moon libration point orbits (LPOs) with continuous thrusts are investigated using an ephemeris model. The lunar flyby transfer has special geometrical and dynamical structures; therefore, its trajectory correction strategy is considerably different from that of previous studies and should be specifically designed. In this paper, we first propose a control strategy based on the backstepping technique with a dead-band scheme using an ephemeris model. The initial error caused by the launch time error is considered. Since the perturbed transfers significantly diverge from the reference transfers after the spacecraft passes by the Moon, we adopt two sets of control parameters in two portions before and after the lunar flyby, respectively. Subsequently, practical constraints owing to the navigation and propellant systems are introduced in the dynamical model of the trajectory correction. Using a prograde type 2 orbit as an example, numerical simulations show that our control strategy can efficiently address trajectory corrections for lunar flyby transfers with different practical constraints. In addition, we analyze the effects of the navigation intervals and dead-band scheme on trajectory corrections. Finally, trajectory corrections for different lunar flyby transfers are depicted and compared.

Keywords: libration point orbit, trajectory correction, Earth–Moon system, continuous thrust, backstepping technique

References(25)

[1]

Farquhar, R. W. The flight of ISEE-3/ICE: Origins, mission history, and a legacy. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2001, 49(1): 23-73.

[2]

Ogilvie, K. W., Desch, M. D. The WIND spacecraft and its early scientific results. Advances in Space Research, 1997, 20(4-5): 559-568.

[3]

Domingo, V., Fleck, B., Poland, A. I. The SOHO mission: An overview. Solar Physics, 1995, 162(1-2): 1-37.

[4]

Bennett, C. L., Bay, M., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jackson, C., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Page, L. et al. The microwave anisotropy probe mission. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2003, 583(1): 1-23.

[5]

Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., Babusiaux, C., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Bastian, U., Biermann, M., Evans, D. W., Eyer, L. et al. The Gaia mission. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2016, 595: A1.

[6]

Wu, W. R., Liu, Y., Liu, L., Zhou, J. L., Tang, G. S., Chen, Y. Z. Pre-LOI trajectory maneuvers of the CHANG'E-2 libration point mission. Science China Information Sciences, 2012, 55(6): 1249-1258.

[7]
Gómez, G., Jorba, A., Masdemont, J., Simó, C. A dynamical systems approach for the analysis of the SOHO mission. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Spacecraft Flight Dynamics, 1991: 449-454.
[8]

Sukhanov, A., Prado, A. F. B. A. Lambert problem solution in the hill model of motion. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2004, 90(3-4): 331-354.

[9]

Renk, F., Landgraf, M. Sun-Earth Libration point transfer options with intermediate HEO. Acta Astronautica, 2012, 74: 1-19.

[10]

Peng, H., Bai, X. L., Masdemont, J. J., Gómez, G., Xu, S. J. Libration transfer design using patched elliptic three-body models and graphics processing units. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017, 40(12): 3155-3166.

[11]

Qi, Y., Xu, S. J., Qi, R. Transfer from Earth to libration point orbit using lunar gravity assist. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 133: 145-157.

[12]

Farquhar, R. W., Muhonen, D. P., Newman, C. R., Heubergerg, H. S. Trajectories and orbital maneuvers for the first libration-point satellite. Journal of Guidance and Control, 1980, 3(6): 549-554.

[13]

Serban, R., Koon, W. S., Lo, M. W., Marsden, J. E., Petzold, L. R., Ross, S. D., Wilson, R. S. Halo orbit mission correction maneuvers using optimal control. Automatica, 2002, 38(4): 571-583.

[14]

Gómez, G., Marcote, M., Masdemont, J. J. Trajectory correction manoeuvres in the transfer to libration point orbits. Acta Astronautica, 2005, 56(7): 652-669.

[15]

Xu, M., Xu, S. J. Trajectory and correction maneuver during the transfer from earth to halo orbit. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2008, 21(3): 200-206.

[16]

Salmani, M., Büskens, C. Real-time control of optimal low-thrust transfer to the Sun-Earth L1 halo orbit in the bicircular four-body problem. Acta Astronautica, 2011, 69(9-10): 882-891.

[17]

Peng, H. J., Gao, Q., Wu, Z. G., Zhong, W. X. Optimal guidance based on receding horizon control for low-thrust transfer to libration point orbits. Advances in Space Research, 2013, 51(11): 2093-2111.

[18]

Qi, Y., de Ruiter, A. Study of correction maneuver for lunar flyby transfers in the real ephemeris. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2018, 41(10): 2112-2132.

[19]
Nazari, M., Anthony, W. M., Butcher, E. Continuous thrust stationkeeping in Earth-Moon L1 halo orbits based on LQR control and floquet theory. In: Proceedings of AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2014: AIAA 2014-4140.https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-4140
DOI
[20]

Qi, Y., de Ruiter, A. Station-keeping strategy for real translunar libration point orbits using continuous thrust. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 94: 105376.

[21]

Jiang, Y., Hu, Q. L., Ma, G. F. Adaptive backstepping fault-tolerant control for flexible spacecraft with unknown bounded disturbances and actuator failures. ISA Transactions, 2010, 49(1): 57-69.

[22]

Folkner, W. M., Williams, J. G., Boggs, D. H., Park, R. S., Kuchynka, P. The planetary and lunar ephemerides DE430 and DE431. The Interplanetary Network Progress Report, 2014, (196): 1-81.

[23]

Deshmukh, V. S., Sinha, S. C. Control of dynamic systems with time-periodic coefficients via the Lyapunov-floquet transformation and backstepping technique. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2004, 10(10): 1517-1533.

[24]

Qi, Y., Xu, S. J. Study of lunar gravity assist orbits in the restricted four-body problem. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2016, 125(3): 333-361.

[25]

Sweetser, T. H., Broschart, S. B., Angelopoulos, V., Whiffen, G. J., Folta, D. C., Chung, M. K., Hatch, S. J., Woodard, M. A. ARTEMIS mission design. Space Science Reviews, 2011, 165(1-4): 27-57.

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 06 August 2020
Accepted: 25 October 2020
Published: 01 February 2021
Issue date: September 2022

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2020

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Canada Research Chair Program under Grant No. 950-230883.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecoorg/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return