AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Friction Article
PDF (2 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

The correlation between friction coefficient and areal topography parameters for AISI 304 steel sliding against AISI 52100 steel

Deepak K. PRAJAPATI( ), Mayank TIWARI
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna 801103, India
Show Author Information

Abstract

Dry wear experiments provide an insight detail on how severely contacting surfaces change under unlubricated sliding condition. The theory of dry sliding wear is used for understanding mixed-lubrication regime in which asperity interactions play a significant role in controlling of the friction coefficient (f). The purpose of this work is to study the tribological behavior of AISI 304 steel in contact with AISI 52100 steel during wear. Both materials are used in rolling element bearings commanly. Experiments are carried out using a pin-on-disc tribometer under dry friction condition. The areal (three dimensional, 3D) topography parameters are measured using a 3D white light interferometer (WLI) with a 10× objective. After wear tests, wear mechanisms are analyzed utilizing scanning electron microscope (SEM). Factorial design with custom response surface design (C-RSD) is used to study the mutual effect of load and speed on response variables such as f and topography parameters. It is observed that the root mean square roughness (Sq) decreases with an increase in sliding time. Within the range of sliding time, Sq decreases with an increase in the normal load. Within the range of sliding speed and normal load, it is found that Sq, mean summit curvature (Ssc), and root mean square slope (Sdq) are positively correlated with f. Whereas, negative correlation is found between f and correlation length (Sal), mean summit radius (R), and core roughness depth (Sk).

Keywords

friction coefficient ( f )areal topography parametersfactorial designnon-contact optical profilerscanning electron microscope (SEM)

References

[1]
K Holmberg, A Erdemir. Influence of tribology on global energy consumption, costs and emissions. Friction 5(3): 263-284 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
K Holmberg, P Kivikytö-Reponen, P Härkisaari, K Valtonen, A Erdemir. Global energy consumption due to friction and wear in the mining industry. Tribol Int 115: 116-139 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
K Holmberg, P Andersson, N O Nylund, K Mäkelä, A Erdemir. Global energy consumption due to friction in trucks and buses. Tribol Int 78: 94-114 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
A Dzierwa, P Pawlus, W Zelasko. Comparison of tribological behaviors of one-process and two-process steel surfaces in ball-on-disc tests. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 228(10): 1195-1210 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
R Velicu, S Bobancu, S Popa. Geometry and kinematics of the plate on disk contact type influencing friction measurements on UMT tribometer. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 147(1): 012042 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
. Application pin-on-disc method for wear rate prediction on interaction between rail and wheel. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 403(1): 012099 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
I Garcia-Prieto, M D Faulkner, J R Alcock. The influence of specimen misalignment on wear in conforming pin on disk tests. Wear 257(1-2): 157-166 (2004)
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
S K Alias, S Ahmad, B Abdullah, H F Pahroraji, G Hamami. Effect of temperature variation on wear behaviour of austenitic stainless steel. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 160(1): 012026 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
G Bregliozzi, S I U Ahmed, A Di Schino, J M Kenny, H Haefke. Friction and wear behavior of austenitic stainless steel: Influence of atmospheric humidity, load range, and grain size. Tribol Lett 17(4): 697-704 (2004)
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
S Kumar, A Mukhopadhyay. Effect of microstructure on the wear behavior of heat treated ss-304 stainless steel. Tribol Ind 38(4): 445-453 (2016)
Google Scholar
[11]
R Nafar Dehsorkhi, S Sabooni, F Karimzadeh, A Rezaeian, M H Enayati. The effect of grain size and martensitic transformation on the wear behavior of AISI 304L stainless steel. Mater Des 64: 56-62 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Y Sun. Sliding wear behaviour of surface mechanical attrition treated AISI 304 stainless steel. Tribol Int 57: 67-75 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Y Sun, R Bailey. Improvement in tribocorrosion behavior of 304 stainless steel by surface mechanical attrition treatment. Surf Coat Technol 253: 284-291 (2014)
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
M A Barcelos, M V Barcelos, J de Sousa Araújo Filho, A R Franco Jr, E A Vieira. Wear resistance of AISI 304 stainless steel submitted to low temperature plasma carburizing. REM Int Eng J 70(3): 293-298 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
W P Dong, P J Sullivan, K J Stout. Comprehensive study of parameters for characterising three-dimensional surface topography: IV: Parameters for characterising spatial and hybrid properties. Wear 178(1-2): 45-60 (1994)
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
W P Dong, P J Sullivan, K J Stout. Comprehensive study of parameters for characterising three-dimensional surface topography: III: Parameters for characterising amplitude and some functional properties. Wear 178(1-2): 29-43 (1994)
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
W P Dong, P J Sullivan, K J Stout. Comprehensive study of parameters for characterizing three-dimensional surface topography II: Statistical properties of parameter variation. Wear 167(1): 9-21 (1993)
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
W P Dong, K J Stout. An integrated approach to the characterization of surface wear I: Qualitative characterization. Wear 181-183: 700-716 (1995)
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
A Raina, A Anand. Influence of surface roughness and nanoparticles concentration on the friction and wear characteristics of PAO base oil. Mater Res Express 5(9): 095018 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
A Lenart, P Pawlus, A Dzierwa. The effect of steel disc surface texture in contact with ceramic ball on friction and wear in dry fretting. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop 6(3): 034004 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
S G Zhu, P Huang. Influence mechanism of morphological parameters on tribological behaviors based on bearing ratio curve. Tribol Int 109: 10-18 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
D K Prajapati, M Tiwari. 3D numerical wear model for determining the change in surface topography. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop 6(4): 045006 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
A Clarke, H P Evans, R W Snidle. Understanding micropitting in gears. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 230(7-8): 1276-1289 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
A Clarke, I J J Weeks, R W Snidle, H P Evans. Running-in and micropitting behaviour of steel surfaces under mixed lubrication conditions. Tribol Int 101: 59-68 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
A Ghosh, S Sadeghi. A novel approach to model effects of surface roughness parameters on wear. Wear 338-339: 73-94 (2015)
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
V Mortazavi, M M Khonsari. On the prediction of transient wear. J Tribol 138(4): 041604 (2016)
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
S Akbarzadeh, M M Khonsari. On the optimization of running-in operating conditions in applications involving EHL line contact. Wear 303(1-2): 130-137 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
M Sedlaček, B Podgornik, J Vižintin. Correlation between standard roughness parameters skewness and kurtosis and tribological behaviour of contact surfaces. Tribol Int 48: 102-112 (2012)
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
L Deleanu, G Andrei, L Maftei. Surface characterization of polymer composite using bearing area curve. In Proceedings of the ASME 2010 10th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, Istanbul, Turkey, 2010.
Crossref
[30]
N Khare, P K Limaye, K Singh, D T Jadhav, A Bute, N Kalel. Experimental and theoretical analysis of Zircaloy-4 and AISI 304 stainless steel material pair in water sliding conditions. Adv Tribol 2018: 7575216 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
M Zandrahimi, M Reza Bateni, A Poladi, J A Szpunar. The formation of martensite during wear of AISI 304 stainless steel. Wear 263(1-6): 674-678 (2007)
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
B Bhushan. Principles and Applications of Tribology. 2nd edn. Hoboken (UK): John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
Crossref
[33]
J A Greenwood, J B P Williamson. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc Roy Soc A 295(1442): 300-319 (1966)
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
D K Prajapati, M Tiwari. Topography analysis of random anisotropic Gaussian rough surfaces. J Tribol 139(4): 041402 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
G Pawar, P Pawlus, I Etsion, B Raeymaekers. The effect of determining topography parameters on analyzing elastic contact between isotropic rough surfaces. J Tribol 135(1): 011401 (2013)
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]
S Roy, D White, S Sundararajan. Correlation between evolution of surface roughness parameters and micropitting of carburized steel under boundary lubrication condition. Surf Coat Technol 350: 445-452 (2018)
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]
N Radhika, R Raghu. Prediction of mechanical properties and modeling on sliding wear behavior of LM25/TiC composite using response surface methodology. Particul Sci Technol 36(1): 104-111 (2017)
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]
M H Cho, S Bahadur, J W Anderegg. Design of experiments approach to the study of tribological performance of Cu-concentrate-filled PPS composites. Tribol Int 39(11): 1436-1446 (2006)
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
L Ilzarbe, M J Álvarez, E Viles, M Tanco. Practical applications of design of experiments in the field of engineering: A bibliographical review. Qual Reliab Eng Int 24(4): 417-428 (2008)
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
D C Montgomery. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 7th edn. New Jersey (USA): John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
[41]
ISO. ISO 25178-2: 2012 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—surface texture: Areal—Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. International Organization for Standardization, 2012.
[42]
T R Thomas. Rough Surfaces. 2nd edn. London (UK): Imperial College Press, 1999.
Crossref
Friction
Volume 9 Issue 1,
February 2021
Pages 41-60
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-019-0323-1
Cite this article:
PRAJAPATI DK, TIWARI M. The correlation between friction coefficient and areal topography parameters for AISI 304 steel sliding against AISI 52100 steel. Friction, 2021, 9(1): 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-019-0323-1

748

Views

15

Downloads

14

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

13

Scopus

2

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 13 February 2019
Revised: 21 May 2019
Accepted: 14 August 2019
Published: 29 July 2020
© The author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Li-cense, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or for-mat, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not in-cluded in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return