References(69)
[1]
Chen Z, Sun XH, Shang YP, et al. Dense ceramics with complex shape fabricated by 3D printing: A review. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 195-218.
[2]
Filippov SP, Yaroslavtsev AB. Hydrogen energy: Development prospects and materials. Russ Chem Rev 2021, 90: 627-643.
[3]
Shi HG, Su C, Ran R, et al. Electrolyte materials for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 2020, 30: 764-774.
[4]
Mahato N, Banerjee A, Gupta A, et al. Progress in material selection for solid oxide fuel cell technology: A review. Prog Mater Sci 2015, 72: 141-337.
[5]
Li DX, Zeng XJ, Li ZP, et al. Progress and perspectives in dielectric energy storage ceramics. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 675-703.
[6]
Zhu ZQ, Gong ZY, Qu P, et al. Additive manufacturing of thin electrolyte layers via inkjet printing of highly-stable ceramic inks. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 279-290.
[7]
Yang GM, Su C, Shi HG, et al. Toward reducing the operation temperature of solid oxide fuel cells: Our past 15 years of efforts in cathode development. Energy Fuels 2020, 34: 15169-15194.
[8]
Adams TA, Nease J, Tucker D, et al. Energy conversion with solid oxide fuel cell systems: A review of concepts and outlooks for the short- and long-term. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013, 52: 3089-3111.
[9]
Bello IT, Zhai S, He QJ, et al. Scientometric review of advancements in the development of high-performance cathode for low and intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells: Three decades in retrospect. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2021, 46: 26518-26536.
[10]
Sun CW, Alonso JA, Bian JJ. Recent advances in perovskite-type oxides for energy conversion and storage applications. Adv Energy Mater 2021, 11: 2000459.
[11]
Choi S, Kucharczyk CJ, Liang YG, et al. Exceptional power density and stability at intermediate temperatures in protonic ceramic fuel cells. Nat Energy 2018, 3: 202-210.
[12]
Merkle R, Hoedl MF, Raimondi G, et al. Oxides with mixed protonic and electronic conductivity. Annu Rev Mater Res 2021, 51: 461-493.
[13]
Medvedev DA. Current drawbacks of proton-conducting ceramic materials: How to overcome them for real electrochemical purposes. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 2021, 32: 100549.
[14]
Schober T, Bohn HG. Water vapor solubility and electrochemical characterization of the high temperature proton conductor BaZr0.9Y0.1O2.95. Solid State Ion 2000, 127: 351-360.
[15]
Ling YH, Guo TM, Guo YY, et al. New two-layer Ruddlesden-Popper cathode materials for protonic ceramics fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 1052-1060.
[16]
Shim JH. Ceramics breakthrough. Nat Energy 2018, 3: 168-169.
[17]
Tao SW, Irvine JTS. A stable, easily sintered proton-conducting oxide electrolyte for moderate-temperature fuel cells and electrolyzers. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 1581-1584.
[18]
Wu JF, Yuan XZ, Martin JJ, et al. A review of PEM fuel cell durability: Degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies. J Power Sources 2008, 184: 104-119.
[19]
Schmitt R, Nenning A, Kraynis O, et al. A review of defect structure and chemistry in ceria and its solid solutions. Chem Soc Rev 2020, 49: 554-592.
[20]
Medvedev DA, Lyagaeva JG, Gorbova EV, et al. Advanced materials for SOFC application: Strategies for the development of highly conductive and stable solid oxide proton electrolytes. Prog Mater Sci 2016, 75: 38-79.
[21]
Pikalova EY, Kalinina EG. Solid oxide fuel cells based on ceramic membranes with mixed conductivity: Improving efficiency. Russ Chem Rev 2021, 90: 703-749.
[22]
Hossain S, Abdalla AM, Jamain SNB, et al. A review on proton conducting electrolytes for clean energy and intermediate temperature-solid oxide fuel cells. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017, 79: 750-764.
[23]
Kreuer KD. Proton-conducting oxides. Annu Rev Mater Res 2003, 33: 333-359.
[24]
Istomin SY, Lyskov NV, Mazo GN, et al. Electrode materials based on complex d-metal oxides for symmetrical solid oxide fuel cells. Russ Chem Rev 2021, 90: 644-676.
[25]
Zvonareva IA, Tarutina LR, Vdovin GK, et al. Heavily Sn-doped barium cerates BaCe0.8-xSnxYb0.2O3-δ: Correlations between composition and ionic transport. Ceram Int 2021, 47: 26391-26399.
[26]
Zvonareva IA, Kasyanova AV, Tarutin AP, et al. Enhanced transport properties of Sn-substituted proton-conducting BaZr0.8Sc0.2O3-δ ceramic materials. J Am Ceram Soc 2022, 105: 2105-2115.
[27]
Sun WP, Liu MF, Liu W. Chemically stable yttrium and tin co-doped barium zirconate electrolyte for next generation high performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Adv Energy Mater 2013, 3: 1041-1050.
[28]
Dawson JA, Tanaka I. Proton trapping in Y and Sn co-doped BaZrO3. J Mater Chem A 2015, 3: 10045-10051.
[29]
Wang YZ, Chesnaud A, Bévillon E, et al. Effects of Sn substitution on structural and electrical properties of BaSn0.75M0.25O3-δ (M = Sc, In, Y, Gd, Nd…). J Alloys Compd 2013, 555: 395-401.
[30]
Wang YZ, Chesnaud A, Bevillon E, et al. Synthesis, structure and protonic conduction of BaSn0.875M0.125O3-δ (M = Sc, Y, In and Gd). Int J Hydrogen Energ 2011, 36: 7688-7695.
[31]
Putilov LP, Shevyrev NA, Mineev AM, et al. Hydration of acceptor-doped BaSnO3: Implications of the bound states of ionic defects. Acta Mater 2020, 190: 70-80.
[32]
Wang YZ, Chesnaud A, Bevillon E, et al. Preparation and characterization of In-substituted BaSnO3 compounds. Funct Mater Lett 2013, 6: 1350041.
[33]
Wang YZ, Chesnaud A, Bevillon E, et al. Properties of Y-doped BaSnO3 proton conductors. Solid State Ion 2012, 214: 45-55.
[34]
Mineev AM, Zvonareva IA, Medvedev DA, et al. Maintaining pronounced proton transportation of solid oxides prepared with a sintering additive. J Mater Chem A 2021, 9: 14553-14565.
[35]
Kasyanova AV, Rudenko AO, Lyagaeva YG, et al. Lanthanum-containing proton-conducting electrolytes with perovskite structures. Membr Membr Technol 2021, 3: 73-97.
[36]
Imai G, Nakamura T, Amezawa K. Defect chemistry and thermodynamic properties of proton dissolution into BaZr0.9Y0.1O3-δ. Solid State Ion 2017, 303: 12-15.
[37]
Hyodo J, Tsujikawa K, Shiga M, et al. Accelerated discovery of proton-conducting perovskite oxide by capturing physicochemical fundamentals of hydration. ACS Energy Lett 2021, 6: 2985-2992.
[38]
Yamazaki Y, Babilo P, Haile SM. Defect chemistry of yttrium-doped barium zirconate: A thermodynamic analysis of water uptake. Chem Mater 2008, 20: 6352-6357.
[39]
Kreuer KD. Aspects of the formation and mobility of protonic charge carriers and the stability of perovskite-type oxides. Solid State Ion 1999, 125: 285-302.
[40]
Kleinlogel CM, Gauckler LJ. Mixed electronic-ionic conductivity of cobalt doped cerium gadolinium oxide. J Electroceramics 2000, 5: 231-243.
[41]
Okuyama Y, Isa K, Lee YS, et al. Incorporation and conduction of proton in SrCe0.9-xZrxY0.1O3-δ. Solid State Ion 2015, 275: 35-38.
[42]
Okuyama Y, Kozai T, Ikeda S, et al. Incorporation and conduction of proton in Sr-doped LaMO3 (M = Al, Sc, In, Yb, Y). Electrochimica Acta 2014, 125: 443-449.
[43]
Okuyama Y, Ymaguchi T, Matsunaga N, et al. Proton conduction and incorporation into La1-xBaxYb0.5In0.5O3-δ. Mater Trans 2018, 59: 14-18.
[44]
Krug F, Schober T. The high-temperature proton conductor strontium zirconate: Thermogravimetry of water uptake. J Am Ceram Soc 1997, 80: 794-796.
[45]
Okuyama Y, Kozai T, Sakai T, et al. Proton transport properties of La0.9M0.1YbO3-δ (M = Ba, Sr, Ca, Mg). Electrochimica Acta 2013, 95: 54-59.
[46]
Han DL, Noda Y, Onishi T, et al. Transport properties of acceptor-doped barium zirconate by electromotive force measurements. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2016, 41: 14897-14908.
[47]
Kröger FA, Vink HJ. Relations between the concentrations of imperfections in crystalline solids. Solid State Phys 1956, 3: 307-435.
[48]
Schober T, Krug F, Schilling W. Criteria for the application of high temperature proton conductors in SOFCs. Solid State Ion 1997, 97: 369-373.
[49]
Zuo C, Zha S, Liu M, et al. Ba(Zr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2)O3-δ as an electrolyte for low-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 3318-3320.
[50]
Fabbri E, D’Epifanio A, di Bartolomeo E, et al. Tailoring the chemical stability of Ba(Ce0.8-xZrx)Y0.2O3-δ protonic conductors for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFCs). Solid State Ion 2008, 179: 558-564.
[51]
Zvonareva I, Fu XZ, Medvedev D, et al. Electrochemistry and energy conversion features of protonic ceramic cells with mixed ionic-electronic electrolytes. Energy Environ Sci 2022, 15: 439-465.
[52]
Medvedev DA, Gorbova EV, Demin AK, et al. Conductivity of Gd-doped BaCeO3 protonic conductor in Н2-Н2О-О2 atmospheres. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2014, 39: 21547-21552.
[53]
Huang YY, Merkle R, Maier J. Effects of NiO addition on sintering and proton uptake of Ba(Zr,Ce,Y)O3-δ. J Mater Chem A 2021, 9: 14775-14785.
[54]
Duan CC, Huang J, Sullivan N, et al. Proton-conducting oxides for energy conversion and storage. Appl Phys Rev 2020, 7: 011314.
[55]
Malešević A, Radojković A, Žunić M, et al. Evaluation of stability and functionality of BaCe1-xInxO3-δ electrolyte in a wider range of indium concentration. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 443-453.
[56]
Fabbri E, Pergolesi D, Licoccia S, et al. Does the increase in Y-dopant concentration improve the proton conductivity of BaZr1-xYxO3-δ fuel cell electrolytes? Solid State Ion 2010, 181: 1043-1051.
[57]
Yang SJ, Wen YB, Zhang SP, et al. Performance and stability of BaCe0.8-xZr0.2InxO3-δ-based materials and reversible solid oxide cells working at intermediate temperature. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2017, 42: 28549-28558.
[58]
Akbar N, Paydar S, Afzal M, et al. Tunning tin-based perovskite as an electrolyte for semiconductor protonic fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2022, 47: 5531-5540.
[59]
Triviño-Peláez Á, Pérez-Coll D, Mather GC. Electrical properties of proton-conducting BaCe0.8Y0.2O3-δ and the effects of bromine addition. Acta Mater 2019, 167: 12-22.
[60]
Kim IH, Lim DK, Bae H, et al. Determination of partial conductivities and computational analysis of the theoretical power density of BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3-δ (BZCYYb1711) electrolyte under various PCFC conditions. J Mater Chem A 2019, 7: 21321-21328.
[61]
Danilov N, Lyagaeva J, Kasyanova A, et al. The effect of oxygen and water vapor partial pressures on the total conductivity of BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.2O3-δ. Ionics 2017, 23: 795-801.
[62]
Kuroha T, Niina Y, Shudo M, et al. Optimum dopant of barium zirconate electrolyte for manufacturing of protonic ceramic fuel cells. J Power Sources 2021, 506: 230134.
[63]
Han DL, Toyoura K, Uda T. Protonated BaZr0.8Y0.23-δ: Impact of hydration on electrochemical conductivity and local crystal structure. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2021, 4: 1666-1676.
[64]
Lyagaeva J, Danilov N, Korona D, et al. Improved ceramic and electrical properties of CaZrO3-based proton-conducting materials prepared by a new convenient combustion synthesis method. Ceram Int 2017, 43: 7184-7192.
[65]
Ding YS, Li Y, Zhang CJ, et al. Effect of grain interior and grain boundaries on transport properties of Sc-doped CaHfO3. J Alloys Compd 2020, 834: 155126.
[66]
Kasyanova A, Tarutina L, Lyagaeva J, et al. Thermal and electrical properties of highly dense ceramic materials based on co-doped LaYO3. JOM 2019, 71: 3789-3795.
[67]
Kochetova NA, Spesivtseva IV, Animitsa IE. Electrical properties of Ba2(In1-xAlx)2O5 solid solutions. Russ J Electrochem 2013, 49: 176-180.
[68]
Tarasova N, Animitsa I, Galisheva A. Electrical properties of new protonic conductors Ba1+хLa1-xInO4-0.5х with Ruddlesden-Popper structure. J Solid State Electrochem 2020, 24: 1497-1508.
[69]
Tarasova N, Galisheva A, Animitsa I, et al. Simultaneous hetero- and isovalent doping as the strategy for improving transport properties of proton conductors based on BaLaInO4. Materials 2021, 14: 6240.