AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Journal of Advanced Ceramics Article
PDF (2.3 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

High-temperature transport properties of BaSn1-xScxO3-δ ceramic materials as promising electrolytes for protonic ceramic fuel cells

Inna A. ZVONAREVAa,b( ), Alexey М. MINEEVc, Natalia A. TARASOVAa,b, Xian-Zhu FUd, Dmitry A. MEDVEDEVa,b( )
Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg 620066, Russia
Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg 620002, Russia
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Protonic ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs) offer a convenient means for electrochemical conversion of chemical energy into electricity at intermediate temperatures with very high efficiency. Although BaCeO3- and BaZrO3-based complex oxides have been positioned as the most promising PCFC electrolytes, the design of new protonic conductors with improved properties is of paramount importance. Within the present work, we studied transport properties of scandium-doped barium stannate (Sc-doped BaSnO3). Our analysis included the fabrication of porous and dense BaSn1-xScxO3-δ ceramic materials (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.37), as well as a comprehensive analysis of their total, ionic, and electronic conductivities across all the experimental conditions realized under the PCFC operation: both air and hydrogen atmospheres with various water vapor partial pressures (p(H2O)), and a temperature range of 500-900 ℃. This work reports on electrolyte domain boundaries of the undoped and doped BaSnO3 for the first time, revealing that pure BaSnO3 exhibits mixed ionic-electronic conduction behavior under both oxidizing and reducing conditions, while the Sc-doping results in the gradual improvement of ionic (including protonic) conductivity, extending the electrolyte domain boundaries towards reduced atmospheres. This latter property makes the heavily-doped BaSnO3 representatives attractive for PCFC applications.

Keywords

BaSnO3protonic ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs)proton transportperovskitehydrationelectronic conductivity

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
40145_0599_ESM.pdf (825.9 KB)

References

[1]
Chen Z, Sun XH, Shang YP, et al. Dense ceramics with complex shape fabricated by 3D printing: A review. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 195-218.
Crossref Google Scholar
[2]
Filippov SP, Yaroslavtsev AB. Hydrogen energy: Development prospects and materials. Russ Chem Rev 2021, 90: 627-643.
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Shi HG, Su C, Ran R, et al. Electrolyte materials for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 2020, 30: 764-774.
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Mahato N, Banerjee A, Gupta A, et al. Progress in material selection for solid oxide fuel cell technology: A review. Prog Mater Sci 2015, 72: 141-337.
Crossref Google Scholar
[5]
Li DX, Zeng XJ, Li ZP, et al. Progress and perspectives in dielectric energy storage ceramics. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 675-703.
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
Zhu ZQ, Gong ZY, Qu P, et al. Additive manufacturing of thin electrolyte layers via inkjet printing of highly-stable ceramic inks. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 279-290.
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Yang GM, Su C, Shi HG, et al. Toward reducing the operation temperature of solid oxide fuel cells: Our past 15 years of efforts in cathode development. Energy Fuels 2020, 34: 15169-15194.
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
Adams TA, Nease J, Tucker D, et al. Energy conversion with solid oxide fuel cell systems: A review of concepts and outlooks for the short- and long-term. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013, 52: 3089-3111.
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Bello IT, Zhai S, He QJ, et al. Scientometric review of advancements in the development of high-performance cathode for low and intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells: Three decades in retrospect. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2021, 46: 26518-26536.
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]
Sun CW, Alonso JA, Bian JJ. Recent advances in perovskite-type oxides for energy conversion and storage applications. Adv Energy Mater 2021, 11: 2000459.
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
Choi S, Kucharczyk CJ, Liang YG, et al. Exceptional power density and stability at intermediate temperatures in protonic ceramic fuel cells. Nat Energy 2018, 3: 202-210.
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Merkle R, Hoedl MF, Raimondi G, et al. Oxides with mixed protonic and electronic conductivity. Annu Rev Mater Res 2021, 51: 461-493.
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Medvedev DA. Current drawbacks of proton-conducting ceramic materials: How to overcome them for real electrochemical purposes. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 2021, 32: 100549.
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Schober T, Bohn HG. Water vapor solubility and electrochemical characterization of the high temperature proton conductor BaZr0.9Y0.1O2.95. Solid State Ion 2000, 127: 351-360.
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Ling YH, Guo TM, Guo YY, et al. New two-layer Ruddlesden-Popper cathode materials for protonic ceramics fuel cells. J Adv Ceram 2021, 10: 1052-1060.
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Shim JH. Ceramics breakthrough. Nat Energy 2018, 3: 168-169.
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Tao SW, Irvine JTS. A stable, easily sintered proton-conducting oxide electrolyte for moderate-temperature fuel cells and electrolyzers. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 1581-1584.
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Wu JF, Yuan XZ, Martin JJ, et al. A review of PEM fuel cell durability: Degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies. J Power Sources 2008, 184: 104-119.
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Schmitt R, Nenning A, Kraynis O, et al. A review of defect structure and chemistry in ceria and its solid solutions. Chem Soc Rev 2020, 49: 554-592.
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]
Medvedev DA, Lyagaeva JG, Gorbova EV, et al. Advanced materials for SOFC application: Strategies for the development of highly conductive and stable solid oxide proton electrolytes. Prog Mater Sci 2016, 75: 38-79.
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Pikalova EY, Kalinina EG. Solid oxide fuel cells based on ceramic membranes with mixed conductivity: Improving efficiency. Russ Chem Rev 2021, 90: 703-749.
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Hossain S, Abdalla AM, Jamain SNB, et al. A review on proton conducting electrolytes for clean energy and intermediate temperature-solid oxide fuel cells. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017, 79: 750-764.
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
Kreuer KD. Proton-conducting oxides. Annu Rev Mater Res 2003, 33: 333-359.
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Istomin SY, Lyskov NV, Mazo GN, et al. Electrode materials based on complex d-metal oxides for symmetrical solid oxide fuel cells. Russ Chem Rev 2021, 90: 644-676.
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]
Zvonareva IA, Tarutina LR, Vdovin GK, et al. Heavily Sn-doped barium cerates BaCe0.8-xSnxYb0.2O3-δ: Correlations between composition and ionic transport. Ceram Int 2021, 47: 26391-26399.
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Zvonareva IA, Kasyanova AV, Tarutin AP, et al. Enhanced transport properties of Sn-substituted proton-conducting BaZr0.8Sc0.2O3-δ ceramic materials. J Am Ceram Soc 2022, 105: 2105-2115.
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]
Sun WP, Liu MF, Liu W. Chemically stable yttrium and tin co-doped barium zirconate electrolyte for next generation high performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Adv Energy Mater 2013, 3: 1041-1050.
Crossref Google Scholar
[28]
Dawson JA, Tanaka I. Proton trapping in Y and Sn co-doped BaZrO3. J Mater Chem A 2015, 3: 10045-10051.
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
Wang YZ, Chesnaud A, Bévillon E, et al. Effects of Sn substitution on structural and electrical properties of BaSn0.75M0.25O3-δ (M = Sc, In, Y, Gd, Nd…). J Alloys Compd 2013, 555: 395-401.
Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Wang YZ, Chesnaud A, Bevillon E, et al. Synthesis, structure and protonic conduction of BaSn0.875M0.125O3-δ (M = Sc, Y, In and Gd). Int J Hydrogen Energ 2011, 36: 7688-7695.
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]
Putilov LP, Shevyrev NA, Mineev AM, et al. Hydration of acceptor-doped BaSnO3: Implications of the bound states of ionic defects. Acta Mater 2020, 190: 70-80.
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]
Wang YZ, Chesnaud A, Bevillon E, et al. Preparation and characterization of In-substituted BaSnO3 compounds. Funct Mater Lett 2013, 6: 1350041.
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]
Wang YZ, Chesnaud A, Bevillon E, et al. Properties of Y-doped BaSnO3 proton conductors. Solid State Ion 2012, 214: 45-55.
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]
Mineev AM, Zvonareva IA, Medvedev DA, et al. Maintaining pronounced proton transportation of solid oxides prepared with a sintering additive. J Mater Chem A 2021, 9: 14553-14565.
Crossref Google Scholar
[35]
Kasyanova AV, Rudenko AO, Lyagaeva YG, et al. Lanthanum-containing proton-conducting electrolytes with perovskite structures. Membr Membr Technol 2021, 3: 73-97.
Crossref Google Scholar
[36]
Imai G, Nakamura T, Amezawa K. Defect chemistry and thermodynamic properties of proton dissolution into BaZr0.9Y0.1O3-δ. Solid State Ion 2017, 303: 12-15.
Crossref Google Scholar
[37]
Hyodo J, Tsujikawa K, Shiga M, et al. Accelerated discovery of proton-conducting perovskite oxide by capturing physicochemical fundamentals of hydration. ACS Energy Lett 2021, 6: 2985-2992.
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]
Yamazaki Y, Babilo P, Haile SM. Defect chemistry of yttrium-doped barium zirconate: A thermodynamic analysis of water uptake. Chem Mater 2008, 20: 6352-6357.
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Kreuer KD. Aspects of the formation and mobility of protonic charge carriers and the stability of perovskite-type oxides. Solid State Ion 1999, 125: 285-302.
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]
Kleinlogel CM, Gauckler LJ. Mixed electronic-ionic conductivity of cobalt doped cerium gadolinium oxide. J Electroceramics 2000, 5: 231-243.
Crossref Google Scholar
[41]
Okuyama Y, Isa K, Lee YS, et al. Incorporation and conduction of proton in SrCe0.9-xZrxY0.1O3-δ. Solid State Ion 2015, 275: 35-38.
Crossref Google Scholar
[42]
Okuyama Y, Kozai T, Ikeda S, et al. Incorporation and conduction of proton in Sr-doped LaMO3 (M = Al, Sc, In, Yb, Y). Electrochimica Acta 2014, 125: 443-449.
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]
Okuyama Y, Ymaguchi T, Matsunaga N, et al. Proton conduction and incorporation into La1-xBaxYb0.5In0.5O3-δ. Mater Trans 2018, 59: 14-18.
Crossref Google Scholar
[44]
Krug F, Schober T. The high-temperature proton conductor strontium zirconate: Thermogravimetry of water uptake. J Am Ceram Soc 1997, 80: 794-796.
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]
Okuyama Y, Kozai T, Sakai T, et al. Proton transport properties of La0.9M0.1YbO3-δ (M = Ba, Sr, Ca, Mg). Electrochimica Acta 2013, 95: 54-59.
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]
Han DL, Noda Y, Onishi T, et al. Transport properties of acceptor-doped barium zirconate by electromotive force measurements. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2016, 41: 14897-14908.
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]
Kröger FA, Vink HJ. Relations between the concentrations of imperfections in crystalline solids. Solid State Phys 1956, 3: 307-435.
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]
Schober T, Krug F, Schilling W. Criteria for the application of high temperature proton conductors in SOFCs. Solid State Ion 1997, 97: 369-373.
Crossref Google Scholar
[49]
Zuo C, Zha S, Liu M, et al. Ba(Zr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2)O3-δ as an electrolyte for low-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 3318-3320.
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]
Fabbri E, D’Epifanio A, di Bartolomeo E, et al. Tailoring the chemical stability of Ba(Ce0.8-xZrx)Y0.2O3-δ protonic conductors for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFCs). Solid State Ion 2008, 179: 558-564.
Crossref Google Scholar
[51]
Zvonareva I, Fu XZ, Medvedev D, et al. Electrochemistry and energy conversion features of protonic ceramic cells with mixed ionic-electronic electrolytes. Energy Environ Sci 2022, 15: 439-465.
Crossref Google Scholar
[52]
Medvedev DA, Gorbova EV, Demin AK, et al. Conductivity of Gd-doped BaCeO3 protonic conductor in Н2-Н2О-О2 atmospheres. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2014, 39: 21547-21552.
Crossref Google Scholar
[53]
Huang YY, Merkle R, Maier J. Effects of NiO addition on sintering and proton uptake of Ba(Zr,Ce,Y)O3-δ. J Mater Chem A 2021, 9: 14775-14785.
Crossref Google Scholar
[54]
Duan CC, Huang J, Sullivan N, et al. Proton-conducting oxides for energy conversion and storage. Appl Phys Rev 2020, 7: 011314.
Crossref Google Scholar
[55]
Malešević A, Radojković A, Žunić M, et al. Evaluation of stability and functionality of BaCe1-xInxO3-δ electrolyte in a wider range of indium concentration. J Adv Ceram 2022, 11: 443-453.
Crossref Google Scholar
[56]
Fabbri E, Pergolesi D, Licoccia S, et al. Does the increase in Y-dopant concentration improve the proton conductivity of BaZr1-xYxO3-δ fuel cell electrolytes? Solid State Ion 2010, 181: 1043-1051.
Crossref Google Scholar
[57]
Yang SJ, Wen YB, Zhang SP, et al. Performance and stability of BaCe0.8-xZr0.2InxO3-δ-based materials and reversible solid oxide cells working at intermediate temperature. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2017, 42: 28549-28558.
Crossref Google Scholar
[58]
Akbar N, Paydar S, Afzal M, et al. Tunning tin-based perovskite as an electrolyte for semiconductor protonic fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2022, 47: 5531-5540.
Crossref Google Scholar
[59]
Triviño-Peláez Á, Pérez-Coll D, Mather GC. Electrical properties of proton-conducting BaCe0.8Y0.2O3-δ and the effects of bromine addition. Acta Mater 2019, 167: 12-22.
Crossref Google Scholar
[60]
Kim IH, Lim DK, Bae H, et al. Determination of partial conductivities and computational analysis of the theoretical power density of BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3-δ (BZCYYb1711) electrolyte under various PCFC conditions. J Mater Chem A 2019, 7: 21321-21328.
Crossref Google Scholar
[61]
Danilov N, Lyagaeva J, Kasyanova A, et al. The effect of oxygen and water vapor partial pressures on the total conductivity of BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.2O3-δ. Ionics 2017, 23: 795-801.
Crossref Google Scholar
[62]
Kuroha T, Niina Y, Shudo M, et al. Optimum dopant of barium zirconate electrolyte for manufacturing of protonic ceramic fuel cells. J Power Sources 2021, 506: 230134.
Crossref Google Scholar
[63]
Han DL, Toyoura K, Uda T. Protonated BaZr0.8Y0.23-δ: Impact of hydration on electrochemical conductivity and local crystal structure. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2021, 4: 1666-1676.
Crossref Google Scholar
[64]
Lyagaeva J, Danilov N, Korona D, et al. Improved ceramic and electrical properties of CaZrO3-based proton-conducting materials prepared by a new convenient combustion synthesis method. Ceram Int 2017, 43: 7184-7192.
Crossref Google Scholar
[65]
Ding YS, Li Y, Zhang CJ, et al. Effect of grain interior and grain boundaries on transport properties of Sc-doped CaHfO3. J Alloys Compd 2020, 834: 155126.
Crossref Google Scholar
[66]
Kasyanova A, Tarutina L, Lyagaeva J, et al. Thermal and electrical properties of highly dense ceramic materials based on co-doped LaYO3. JOM 2019, 71: 3789-3795.
Crossref Google Scholar
[67]
Kochetova NA, Spesivtseva IV, Animitsa IE. Electrical properties of Ba2(In1-xAlx)2O5 solid solutions. Russ J Electrochem 2013, 49: 176-180.
Crossref Google Scholar
[68]
Tarasova N, Animitsa I, Galisheva A. Electrical properties of new protonic conductors Ba1+хLa1-xInO4-0.5х with Ruddlesden-Popper structure. J Solid State Electrochem 2020, 24: 1497-1508.
Crossref Google Scholar
[69]
Tarasova N, Galisheva A, Animitsa I, et al. Simultaneous hetero- and isovalent doping as the strategy for improving transport properties of proton conductors based on BaLaInO4. Materials 2021, 14: 6240.
Crossref Google Scholar
Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Volume 11 Issue 7,
July 2022
Pages 1131-1143
DOI: 10.1007/s40145-022-0599-x
Cite this article:
ZVONAREVA IA, MINEEV AМ, TARASOVA NA, et al. High-temperature transport properties of BaSn1-xScxO3-δ ceramic materials as promising electrolytes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2022, 11(7): 1131-1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-022-0599-x

1623

Views

153

Downloads

36

Crossref

35

Web of Science

37

Scopus

9

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 13 March 2022
Revised: 07 April 2022
Accepted: 13 April 2022
Published: 02 July 2022
© The Author(s) 2022.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Return