Journal Home > Volume 15 , Issue 11

Nowadays, building energy models (BEMs) are widely used, particularly in the assessment of energy consumption in buildings to address the potential savings that can be generated. The realisation of a dynamic energy model based on high-fidelity physics (white-box models) requires a tuning process to fit the model to reality, due to many uncertainties involved. Currently some research trends try to reduce this performance gap by modulating different types of experimental parameters such as: capacitances or infiltration. The EnergyPlus simulation software, in its latest versions, has implemented an object: HybridModel: Zone that calculates the infiltration and internal mass of buildings using an inverse modelling approach that employs only the measured indoor temperature data to invert the heat balance equation for the zone under study. The main objective of this paper is to reduce the execution time and uncertainties in the development of quality energy models by generating a new calibration methodology that implements this approach. This uses, as a starting point, a research created by the authors of this study, which was empirically and comparatively validated against the energy models developed by the participants in Annex 58. It is also worth highlighting the empirical validation of the HybridModel: Zone object, since it was activated in all scenarios where its execution is possible: periods of seven days or more of free oscillation and periods in which the building is under load. The findings are promising. The data generated with the new methodology, if compared with those produced by the baseline model, improve their resemblance to the real ones by 22.9%. While those of its predecessor did it by 15.6%. For this study, the two dwellings foreseen in Annex 58 of the IEA ECB project have been modelled and their real monitoring data have been used.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
Electronic supplementary material
About this article

A building energy models calibration methodology based on inverse modelling approach

Show Author's information Vicente Gutiérrez GonzálezCarlos Fernández Bandera( )
Installations, construction and structures, School of Architecture, University of Navarra, Campus Universitario, Pamplona, 31009, Navarra, Spain

Abstract

Nowadays, building energy models (BEMs) are widely used, particularly in the assessment of energy consumption in buildings to address the potential savings that can be generated. The realisation of a dynamic energy model based on high-fidelity physics (white-box models) requires a tuning process to fit the model to reality, due to many uncertainties involved. Currently some research trends try to reduce this performance gap by modulating different types of experimental parameters such as: capacitances or infiltration. The EnergyPlus simulation software, in its latest versions, has implemented an object: HybridModel: Zone that calculates the infiltration and internal mass of buildings using an inverse modelling approach that employs only the measured indoor temperature data to invert the heat balance equation for the zone under study. The main objective of this paper is to reduce the execution time and uncertainties in the development of quality energy models by generating a new calibration methodology that implements this approach. This uses, as a starting point, a research created by the authors of this study, which was empirically and comparatively validated against the energy models developed by the participants in Annex 58. It is also worth highlighting the empirical validation of the HybridModel: Zone object, since it was activated in all scenarios where its execution is possible: periods of seven days or more of free oscillation and periods in which the building is under load. The findings are promising. The data generated with the new methodology, if compared with those produced by the baseline model, improve their resemblance to the real ones by 22.9%. While those of its predecessor did it by 15.6%. For this study, the two dwellings foreseen in Annex 58 of the IEA ECB project have been modelled and their real monitoring data have been used.

Keywords: infiltration, EnergyPlus, energy simulation, inverse model, internal thermal mass, Annex 58

References(57)

Al-Homoud MS (2001). Computer-aided building energy analysis techniques. Building and Environment, 36: 421–433.

Annex58 (2016). Annex 58: Reliable building energy performance characterisation based on full scale dynamic measurement. Available at https://bwk.kuleuven.be/bwf/projects/annex58/index.htm. Accessed 10-06-2020.

Ascione F, Bianco N, Iovane T, et al. (2020). A real industrial building: Modeling, calibration and Pareto optimization of energy retrofit. Journal of Building Engineering, 29: 101186.

ASHRAE (2013). ASHRAE Handbook: Fundamentals. Atlanta, GA, USA: The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

Burch J, Subbarao K, Lekov A, et al. (1990). Short-term energy monitoring in a large commercial building. ASHRAE Transactions, 96(1): 1459–1477, 1990.

Chen J, Gao X, Hu Y, et al. (2019). A meta-model-based optimization approach for fast and reliable calibration of building energy models. Energy, 188: 116046.

Crawley DB, Hand JW, Kummert M, et al. (2008). Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Building and Environment, 43: 661–673.

Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6: 182–197.

Dhar A, Reddy TA, Claridge DE (1999). Generalization of the Fourier series approach to model hourly energy use in commercial buildings. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 121: 54–62.

Dong B, Cao C, Lee SE (2005). Applying support vector machines to predict building energy consumption in tropical region. Energy and Buildings, 37: 545–553.

Ellis PG, Torcellini PA, Crawley DB (2008). Energy design plugin: An EnergyPlus plugin for sketchup. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO, USA.

Fan C, Xiao F, Wang S (2014). Development of prediction models for next-day building energy consumption and peak power demand using data mining techniques. Applied Energy, 127: 1–10.

Fernández Bandera C, Muñoz Mardones A, Du H, et al. (2018). Exergy as a measure of sustainable retrofitting of buildings. Energies, 11: 3139.

Foucquier A, Robert S, Suard F, et al. (2013). State of the art in building modelling and energy performances prediction: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 23: 272–288.

Giuliani M, Henze GP, Florita AR (2016). Modelling and calibration of a high-mass historic building for reducing the prebound effect in energy assessment. Energy and Buildings, 116: 434–448.

Guglielmetti R, Macumber D, Long N (2011). OpenStudio: An open source integrated analysis platform. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO, USA.

Gutiérrez González V, Álvarez Colmenares L, López Fidalgo JF, et al (2019). Uncertainy's indices assessment for calibrated energy models. Energies, 12(11): 2096.

Gutiérrez González V, Ramos Ruiz G, Fernández Bandera C (2020). Empirical and comparative validation for a building energy model calibration methodology. Sensors, 20: 5003.

Gutiérrez González V, Ramos Ruiz G, Fernández Bandera C (2022). Ground characterization of building energy models. Energy and Buildings, 254: 111565.

Heo Y, Choudhary R, Augenbroe GA (2012). Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty. Energy and Buildings, 47: 550–560.

Heo Y, Zavala VM (2012). Gaussian process modeling for measurement and verification of building energy savings. Energy and Buildings, 53: 7–18.

Hong T, Piette MA, Chen Y, et al. (2015). Commercial Building Energy Saver: An energy retrofit analysis toolkit. Applied Energy, 159: 298–309.

Hong T, Lee SH (2019). Integrating physics-based models with sensor data: An inverse modeling approach. Building and Environment, 154: 23–31.

Johra H, Heiselberg P (2017). Influence of internal thermal mass on the indoor thermal dynamics and integration of phase change materials in furniture for building energy storage: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69: 19–32.

Kwok SSK, Yuen RKK, Lee EWM (2011). An intelligent approach to assessing the effect of building occupancy on building cooling load prediction. Building and Environment, 46: 1681–1690.

Lee SH, Hong T, Piette MA, et al. (2015a). Accelerating the energy retrofit of commercial buildings using a database of energy efficiency performance. Energy, 90: 738–747.

Lee SH, Hong T, Piette MA, et al. (2015b). Energy retrofit analysis toolkits for commercial buildings: A review. Energy, 89: 1087–1100.

Lee SH, Hong T (2019). Validation of an inverse model of zone air heat balance. Building and Environment, 161: 106232.

Martínez S, Eguía P, Granada E, et al. (2020). A performance comparison of multi-objective optimization-based approaches for calibrating white-box building energy models. Energy and Buildings, 216: 109942.

Nagpal S, Hanson J, Reinhart C (2019). A framework for using calibrated campus-wide building energy models for continuous planning and greenhouse gas emissions reduction tracking. Applied Energy, 241: 82–97.

Pachano JE, Peppas A, Bandera CF (2022). Seasonal adaptation of VRF HVAC model calibration process to a Mediterranean climate. Energy and Buildings, 261: 111941.

Ramos Ruiz G, Fernández Bandera C, Gómez-Acebo Temes T, et al. (2016). Genetic algorithm for building envelope calibration. Applied Energy, 168: 691–705.

Ramos Ruiz G, Fernández Bandera C (2017a). Analysis of uncertainty indices used for building envelope calibration. Applied Energy, 185: 82–94.

Ramos Ruiz G, Fernández Bandera C (2017b). Validation of calibrated energy models: Common errors. Energies, 10: 1587.

Reddy TA (2006). Literature review on calibration of building energy simulation programs: Uuses, problems, procedures, uncertainty, and tools. ASHRAE Transactions, 112(1): 226–240.

Robertson JJ, Polly BJ, Collis JM (2015). Reduced-order modeling and simulated annealing optimization for efficient residential building utility bill calibration. Applied Energy, 148: 169–177.

Robinson C, Dilkina B, Hubbs J, et al. (2017). Machine learning approaches for estimating commercial building energy consumption. Applied Energy, 208: 889–904.

Royapoor M, Roskilly T (2015). Building model calibration using energy and environmental data. Energy and Buildings, 94: 109–120.

Sadaei HJ, de Lima e Silva PC, Guimarães FG, et al. (2019). Short-term load forecasting by using a combined method of convolutional neural networks and fuzzy time series. Energy, 175: 365–377.

Siddharth V, Ramakrishna PV, Geetha T, et al. (2011). Automatic generation of energy conservation measures in buildings using genetic algorithms. Energy and Buildings, 43: 2718–2726.

Soebarto V (1997). Calibration of hourly energy simulations using hourly monitored data and monthly utility records for two case study buildings. In: Proceedings of the 5th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Madison, WI, USA.

Strachan P, Svehla K, Heusler I, et al. (2016). Whole model empirical validation on a full-scale building. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 9: 331–350.

Subbarao K (1988). PSTAR: Primary and secondary terms analysis and renormalization: A unified approach to building energy simulations and short-term monitoring. Technical report, Solar Energy Research Inst., Golden, CO, USA.
DOI

Subbarao K, Balcomb JD, Burch JD, et al. (1990). Short-term energy monitoring: Summary of results from four houses. ASHRAE Transactions, 96(1): 1478–1483.

Tahmasebi F, Mahdavi A (2012). Monitoring-based optimization-assisted calibration of the thermal performance model of an office building. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Architecture and Urban Design, Tirana, Albania.

Thomas Ng S, Skitmore M, Wong KF (2008). Using genetic algorithms and linear regression analysis for private housing demand forecast. Building and Environment, 43: 1171–1184.

Tüysüz F, Sözer H (2020). Calibrating the building energy model with the short term monitored data A case study of a large-scale residential building. Energy and Buildings, 224: 110207.

US DOE (2016). EnergyPlus Engineering reference—EnergyPlus 8.5. The Reference to EnergyPlus Calculation.
US DOE (2020). EnergyPlus Engineering Reference. The reference to EnergyPlus calculations.

Wang S, Xu X (2006). Parameter estimation of internal thermal mass of building dynamic models using genetic algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 47: 1927–1941.

Wang Z, Wang Y, Srinivasan RS (2018). A novel ensemble learning approach to support building energy use prediction. Energy and Buildings, 159: 109–122.

Yang Z, Becerik-Gerber B (2015). A model calibration framework for simultaneous multi-level building energy simulation. Applied Energy, 149: 415–431.

Yu Z, Haghighat F, Fung BCM, et al. (2010). A decision tree method for building energy demand modeling. Energy and Buildings, 42: 1637–1646.

Yuan P, Duanmu L, Wang Z (2019). Coal consumption prediction model of space heating with feature selection for rural residences in severe cold area in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50: 101643.

Zeng R, Wang X, Di H, et al. (2011). New concepts and approach for developing energy efficient buildings: Ideal specific heat for building internal thermal mass. Energy and Buildings, 43: 1081–1090.

Zhang Y, Korolija I (2010). Performing complex parametric simulations with jEPlus. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies (SET2010), Shanghai, China.
DOI
Zhang Y, O'Neill Z, Wagner T, et al. (2013). An inverse model with uncertainty quantification to estimate the energy performance of an office building. In: Proceedings of 13th International International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Chambery, France.
File
bs-15-11-1883_ESM.pdf (4.2 MB)
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 09 February 2022
Revised: 16 March 2022
Accepted: 21 March 2022
Published: 13 April 2022
Issue date: November 2022

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2022

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Government of Navarra under the project "From BIM to BEM: B & B" (ref. 0011-1365-2020-000227). We would like to thank the promoters of Annex 58, the possibility of accessing the data of the houses. Without this data, it would not have been possible to complete this work.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Return