Journal Home > Volume 13 , Issue 6

A growing number of cases have proved the possibility of airborne transmission of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Ensuring an adequate ventilation rate is essential to reduce the risk of infection in confined spaces. In this study, we estimated the association between the infection probability and ventilation rates with the Wells-Riley equation, where the quantum generation rate (q) by a COVID-19 infector was obtained using a reproductive number-based fitting approach. The estimated q value of COVID-19 is 14-48 h-1. To ensure an infection probability of less than 1%, a ventilation rate larger than common values (100-350 m3/h per infector and 1200-4000 m3/h per infector for 0.25 h and 3 h of exposure, respectively) is required. If the infector and susceptible person wear masks, then the ventilation rate ensuring a less than 1% infection probability can be reduced to a quarter respectively, which is easier to achieve by the normal ventilation mode applied in typical scenarios, including offices, classrooms, buses, and aircraft cabins. Strict preventive measures (e.g., wearing masks and preventing asymptomatic infectors from entering public spaces using tests) that have been widely adopted should be effective in reducing the risk of infection in confined spaces.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Association of the infection probability of COVID-19 with ventilation rates in confined spaces

Show Author's information Hui Dai1Bin Zhao1,2( )
Department of Building Science, School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Beijing Key Laboratory of Indoor Air Quality Evaluation and Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Abstract

A growing number of cases have proved the possibility of airborne transmission of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Ensuring an adequate ventilation rate is essential to reduce the risk of infection in confined spaces. In this study, we estimated the association between the infection probability and ventilation rates with the Wells-Riley equation, where the quantum generation rate (q) by a COVID-19 infector was obtained using a reproductive number-based fitting approach. The estimated q value of COVID-19 is 14-48 h-1. To ensure an infection probability of less than 1%, a ventilation rate larger than common values (100-350 m3/h per infector and 1200-4000 m3/h per infector for 0.25 h and 3 h of exposure, respectively) is required. If the infector and susceptible person wear masks, then the ventilation rate ensuring a less than 1% infection probability can be reduced to a quarter respectively, which is easier to achieve by the normal ventilation mode applied in typical scenarios, including offices, classrooms, buses, and aircraft cabins. Strict preventive measures (e.g., wearing masks and preventing asymptomatic infectors from entering public spaces using tests) that have been widely adopted should be effective in reducing the risk of infection in confined spaces.

Keywords: COVID-19, ventilation, SARS-CoV-2, infection probability, Wells-Riley equation

References(37)

Anderson RM, Anderson B, May RM (1992). Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Anfinrud P, Stadnytskyi V, Bax CE, Bax A (2020). Visualizing speech-generated oral fluid droplets with laser light scattering. New England Journal of Medicine, 382: 2061-2063.
Buonanno G, Stabile L, Morawska L (2020). Estimation of airborne viral emission: Quanta emission rate of SARS-CoV-2 for infection risk assessment. Environment International, 141: 105794.
Chartier Y, Atkinson J, Pessoa-Silva C (2009). Natural ventilation for infection control in health-care settings. World Health Organization.
D’Arienzo M, Coniglio A (2020). Assessment of the SARS-CoV-2 basic reproduction number, R0, based on the early phase of COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Biosafety and Health, 2: 57-59.
Davies A, Thompson KA, Giri K, Kafatos G, Walker J, Bennett A (2013). Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 7: 413-418.
Duan X, Zhao X, Wang B, Chen Y, Cao S (2013). Exposure Factors Handbook of Chinese Population (Adults). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. (in Chinese)
Escombe AR, Oeser CC, Gilman RH, Navincopa M, Ticona E, et al. (2007). Natural ventilation for the prevention of airborne contagion. PLoS Medicine, 4: e68.
Fennelly KP, Nardell EA (1998). The relative efficacy of respirators and room ventilation in preventing occupational tuberculosis. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 19: 754-759.
Fisk WJ, Seppanen O, Faulkner D, Huang J (2004). Economic benefits of an economizer system: Energy savings and reduced sick leave. Technical Report, LBNL-54475, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Foarde KK (1999). Methodology to perform clean air delivery rate type determinations with microbiological aerosols. Aerosol Science and Technology, 30: 235-245.
Guo Z-D, Wang Z-Y, Zhang S-F, Li X, Li L, et al. (2020). Aerosol and surface distribution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in hospital wards, Wuhan, China, 2020. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 26: 1583-1591.
Hui DS, Chow BK, Chu L, Ng SS, Lee N, et al. (2012). Exhaled air dispersion during coughing with and without wearing a surgical or N95 mask. PLoS One, 7: e50845.
Imai N, Cori A, Dorigatti I, Baguelin M, Donnelly CA, et al. (2020). Report 3: Transmissibility of 2019-nCoV. Imperial College London. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/77148.
Ji W, Zhao B (2015). Contribution of outdoor-originating particles, indoor-emitted particles and indoor secondary organic aerosol (SOA) to residential indoor PM2.5 concentration: A model-based estimation. Building and Environment, 90: 196-205.
Lee S, Golinski M, Chowell G (2012). Modeling optimal age-specific vaccination strategies against pandemic influenza. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 74: 958-980.
Li HL, Zhang XL, Wang K (2018). A quantitative study on the epidemic situation of tuberculosis based on the transmission disease dynamics in 14 prefectures of Xinjiang from 2005 to 2017. Chinese Journal of Infection Control, 17(11): 945-950. (in Chinese)
Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, et al. (2020). Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. New England Journal of Medicine, 382: 1199-1207.
Liu Y, Gayle AA, Wilder-Smith A, Rocklöv J (2020a). The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus. Journal of Travel Medicine, 27(2): taaa021.
Liu Y, Ning Z, Chen Y, Guo M, Liu Y, et al. (2020b). Aerodynamic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in two Wuhan hospitals. Nature, 582: 557-560.
Lu J, Gu J, Li K, Xu C, Su W, et al. (2020). COVID-19 outbreak associated with air conditioning in restaurant, Guangzhou, China, 2020. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 26: 1628-1631.
Majumder M, Mandl KD (2020). Early transmissibility assessment of a novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. SSRN Electronic Journal, .
Morawska L, Cao J (2020). Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality. Environment International, 139: 105730.
National Research Council (2020). Rapid Expert Consultation on the Possibility of Bioaerosol Spread of SARS-CoV-2 for the COVID-19 Pandemic.Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
Plans Rubió P (2012). Is the basic reproductive number (R0) for measles viruses observed in recent outbreaks lower than in the pre-vaccination era? Euro Surveillance, 17(31): 20233.
Read JM, Bridgen JRE, Cummings DAT, Ho A, Jewell CP (2020). Novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV: Early estimation of epidemiological parameters and epidemic predictions. medRxiv, .
Riley EC, Murphy G, Riley RL (1978). Airborne spread of measles in a suburban elementary school. American Journal of Epidemiology, 107: 421-432.
Riou J, Althaus CL (2020). Pattern of early human-to-human transmission of Wuhan 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), December 2019 to January 2020. Euro Surveillance, 25: 2000058.
Sherman MH, Wilson DJ (1986). Relating actual and effective ventilation in determining indoor air quality. Building and Environment, 21: 135-144.
Stadnytskyi V, Bax CE, Bax A, Anfinrud P (2020). The airborne lifetime of small speech droplets and their potential importance in SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America(PNAS), 117: 11875-11877.
Stephens B (2012). HVAC filtration and the Wells-Riley approach to assessing risks of infectious airborne diseases. National Air Filtration Association (NAFA) Foundation Report.
Tang B, Bragazzi NL, Li Q, Tang S, Xiao Y, Wu J (2020). An updated estimation of the risk of transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCov). Infectious Disease Modelling, 5: 248-255.
Van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, et al. (2020). Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. New England Journal of Medicine, 382: 1564-1567.
WHO (2003). Consensus document on the epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) (No. WHO/CDS/CSR/GAR/ 2003.11). World Health Organization.
WHO (2019). WHO MERS global summary and assessment of risk, July 2019 (No. WHO/MERS/RA/19.1). World Health Organization.
DOI
Zhao B, Liu Y, Chen C (2020a). Air purifiers: A supplementary measure to remove airborne SARS-CoV-2. Building and Environment, 177: 106918.
Zhao S, Lin Q, Ran J, Musa SS, Yang G, et al. (2020b). Preliminary estimation of the basic reproduction number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020: A data-driven analysis in the early phase of the outbreak. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 92: 214-217.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements

Publication history

Received: 11 June 2020
Accepted: 27 July 2020
Published: 04 August 2020
Issue date: December 2020

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2020YFC0842500) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52041602, No. 51521005).

Return